February 24, 2007
"Excuse me, maybe I'm a traditionalist, but I see no place for these weapons among our hunting fraternity," Zumbo wrote in his blog on the Outdoor Life Web site. The Feb. 16 posting has since been taken down. "As hunters, we don't need to be lumped into the group of people who terrorize the world with them. . . . I'll go so far as to call them 'terrorist' rifles."Given the casual nature with which Zumbo denounced an entire segment of the gun owning community, you may not be surprised to learn that Zumbo's time with Outdoor Life is over. Unfortunately, the news of this event has been penned, as it often is, by writers almost completely ignorant of, and likely antagonistic to, firearms. Readers familiar with firearms issues will spot right away multiple problems with the following paragraph:
The reaction -- from tens of thousands of owners of assault rifles across the country, from media and manufacturers rooted in the gun business, and from the National Rifle Association -- has been swift, severe and unforgiving. Despite a profuse public apology and a vow to go hunting soon with an assault weapon, Zumbo's career appears to be over.The part about Zumbo's career being over is probably accurate, but the writer's use of "assault rifle" and "assault weapon" appears to be clumsy and to evince an ignorance of firearms and firearm terminology that is all too common among the nation's professional reporting class. If news writers were really the professionals they claim to be, they'd learn the terminology of the subject they're writing about.
In any event, the fate of Jim Zumbo should serve as a word to the wise : if you rely on gun owners for your bread and butter, don't go relying on Sarah Brady for edgy article ideas.
Posted by: Ragnar at
09:32 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 340 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: dick at February 24, 2007 10:40 PM (IsEA3)
Posted by: steve at February 24, 2007 10:59 PM (TlIfZ)
Posted by: JOHN RYAN at February 24, 2007 11:11 PM (TcoRJ)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 12:43 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 12:47 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Hucbald at February 25, 2007 02:10 AM (w8csg)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 05:45 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Ragnardo Di Cannaskjold at February 25, 2007 09:00 AM (b0FZu)
Posted by: Insomniac at February 25, 2007 08:49 PM (wZLWV)
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 10:49 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 26, 2007 02:33 AM (eGb9y)
It was only a test.
If it was an actual pie,
you'd have been given a fork and napkin.
And perhaps some coffee.
This concludes this test of the early pie warning system.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 26, 2007 02:35 AM (eGb9y)
Yugoslavian Paratrooper Model AK-47. It's about as powerful as a 30-30,
and I've killed many a deer with an old Winchester '64, so I have no
doubt I can do it, especially if I have a night-scope with IR laser
target illumination. Yeah, that's gonna happen... But I digress; the
whole point would be to show that a gun is an inanimate object, and
they can't do one damn thing until someone picks them up and uses them,
so the only trick is to discourage indiscreet use of guns by severely
punishing even minor acts of criminal conduct involving firearms, and
by meting out the ultimate punishment to murderers, molesters, robbers,
and rapists. Take their lives, in swift and sure justice, and do it
publicly so that everyone will see what happens to scum. But my
apologies, for I digress again. Another time perhaps... ta!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 26, 2007 02:44 AM (eGb9y)
Today, I recommend only Fur-Fish-Game, as even the NRA magazines are too "lawyered".
Posted by: Phillep at February 26, 2007 11:34 AM (OareP)
Posted by: catseye at February 26, 2007 12:21 PM (X+AwP)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 26, 2007 07:05 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: sandpiper at February 28, 2007 11:26 AM (4pkrX)
34 queries taking 0.0445 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.