January 09, 2007
So we have the unsupported word of AP (which did not publish a transcript of the alleged admission) vs. the unsupported word of a blogger quoting a member of CPATT. Were I a betting man (oh wait, I am), I'd have to give the odds to Flopping Aces in this one. Especially insofar as, to this date, I don't believe AP has even acknowledged that their original story (four mosques "burned," 24 Sunnis slain) was completely wrong. They simply changed it quietly, in the dead of night, without noting the changes... which does not inspire confidence in their confident assertions today.This is all pending confirmation, bear in mind.If true (if!), it would be a pretty darned good explanation of why MOI and MNFI were unable to find Jamil Hussein: because AP lied about his name, giving him a pseudonym then daring anyone to find him.
Stay tuned. Here's Bob Owens on this development.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
07:42 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.
32 queries taking 0.0386 seconds, 154 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









