1 Speaking of fat-asses... when are  you guys joining up? The troops are tired, and need help.

I can see how watching that you could almost believe for a second that the U.S. was making progress. Just keep showing troops handing out blankets, and meeting with locals, and everybody could believe for a second that it's all gonna be okay.

This is called "propaganda", and it hides the cluster-fuck that is Iraq. It's not to say that the vast bulk of your military isn't there with the best of intentions, and giving it their all, but it hides the policy failures at the top. As they say, shit flows downhill.

See... your president is a retarded asshole, and he's surrounded by a mixture of insane assholes, greedy assholes, and incompetant goofballs. All of whom bare responsibility for this failure of a war, not the media. You guys think that if you just keep saying it's all okay, then it is. That is not dealing in reality, but then... that's how conservatives live their lives.

Maybe Michelle should step away from the embed, and get the real picture... not just the one the gov wants her to see. That's called "reporting" as oppose to publishing the newsletter.

2

John you narrow minded piece of shit. Ever thought that perhaps we want the muslims to kill each other? Lefturd! While the Sunnis and Shiites are focused on killing each other we get to sit back and watch.

 

Your opinion about our president and our leaders means nothing to Americans. You're nothing but a sniveling simple minded little shit. We know people like you. Left out, lonely, never invited to join the group little nerd. Why should we care what you think. Screw you asshole. Now go back to your room and maybe mommy will bring you a cookie. Friggin idiot.

3
You know the funny part, John?

I think the very sight of an Iraq not out of control and on fire with every video clip and picture scares you.

I like that.
 

4 And I'm sure a few quiet, productive moments could have been found on the Titanic as she up-ended. All in all though, history seems to have settled on it as a tragedy.

Good luck lookin' at the sunny side.

5 Meanwhile the Britannic had its chairs in disarray, its captain
appeared to be a stuttering idiot, yet the ship still sailed serenely
into port.  The final outcome had little to do with anything
newsworthy that the AP could report.

6 Good analogy, especially the stuttering idiot captain. It's worth noting in your analogy that the Britannia eventually sank as well.

7 Yea but a U boat sand the Britannia

8 A U-boat that didn't attack the US.

9 No, one that attacked a British hospital ship.

10 Joke:


Speaking of fat-asses... when are  you joining up with Al Qaeda? The terrorists are tired, and need help. If you oppose the Coalition's mission to aid Iraq so strongly, join the opposition officially. After all, according to your argument, people need to join every single group they support, whether it be the police dept, fire dept, Girl Scouts, or a gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender action committee.

You often say you support the troops. You join up, mother fucker. Then you can see if there's a difference between supporting the troops and supporting their mission.


Using the chickenhawk canard over and over, no matter how many times it's been refuted, is a sure sign of your severe mental retardation. You need to head back to the DU for new programming. Good luck with that, because the left hasn't had an original idea in decades.


Maybe you should step away from the Establishment Media and moonbat blogs, and get the real picture... not just the one the subversive propagandists want you to see. That's called "reporting" as opposed to publishing the DNC newsletter.

11 Creep, Joke, et al.:


WWII was far more chaotic than the mission in Iraq. America lost every major battle for the first two and a half years. Most of the American naval fleet was sank at Pearl Harbor before war was declared. German and Japanese prison camps were bursting with American POWs. Intelligence failures were the norm. More than 25,000 Allied deserters were wandering around Europe. The rape of civilians was so common that Eisenhower considered public hangings for his own soldiers. Captured and surrendering German and Japanese soldiers were routinely murdered. German pilots were shot as they parachuted to safety, even though the Luftwaffe refused to practice the same tactic. Civilian populations were carpet bombed. Entire cities were destroyed regularly. Even after the War turned in the Allies' favor, setbacks and routs occurred. The Battle of the Bulge was a German counter offensive that killed or captured 3/4 of the opposing Allied troops, and Allied Intelligence knew beforehand that German forces were massing in the Ardennes forest--the same way they had done in their offensive blitz early in the war! The Japanese refused to surrender until a second Atomic bomb was dropped, with Truman's promise of dropping as many more as it took. Even then, the Emperor had to break a deadlock in the ruling Military Order to accept the surrender--and military forces tried to assassinate him for doing so. The reconstruction of Germany and japan took more than 20 years, and American troops are still stationed in both of those countries.


Despite its imperfection, the mission in Iraq hasn't suffered any of those setbacks. WWII is universally accepted as a successful war, despite its panoply of errors, but Iraq is described as a quagmire, civil war, tragedy, etc. The left's description of the mission in Iraq as a historical failure before that mission has even ended is ridiculous. Its jihad to oppose American military action is motivated 100% by America-last ideology, and has no basis whatsoever in reality. You leftards want another Vietnam, where America betrays its allies to their despicable aggressors, and the Dem-left capitalizes on its treason to build its corrupt power and divide the nation.


Guess what, assholes? America isn't running from Iraq. It is reinforcing the troops already there, and ramping up combat operations against your beloved terrorists. Bush will be President for two more years, and he ain't budging from Iraq.


Do you want an accurate analogy of the left's idiotic and cowardly cut n' run strategy? Expecting America to surrender to the terrorists is like expecting the Titanic to surrender to the iceberg, or for the Britannia to surrender to the torpedoes. Stupid suggestions that would produce disastrous consequences.

History will not record the left's fabrications and distortions regarding the war on jihadis as fact. It will document the left's actions as what they are: Treasonous. Suck it up, bitches.

12 "according to your argument, people need to join every single group they support, whether it be the police dept, fire dept, Girl Scouts, or a gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender action committee."

The police department and other groups are not over-stretched and begging for new personel. The US military is forcing soldiers to pull multiple tours, all to support your vision of an extended war that isn't working. I keep asking... why won't you put your ass on the line?

And you keep not answering Jeff. I want to know why. You have not disputed the "chicken little cannard" at all. You've avoided the question at every turn. You simply think that it's okay to support policies that force soldiers to fight your war, while you sit in the comfort of your own home.

Why Jeff, why?

P.S. The blog Jeff. Are we going to do it or not?

I'm thinking we call it "Jeff Hates John" or maybe "Krazy Korner With Jeff and John"

Whaddya say buddy? I'll try not to make you look like too much of a moron.

13 A-Holz,

Guess what, assholes? America isn't running from Iraq. It is
reinforcing the troops already there, and ramping up combat operations
against your beloved terrorists. Bush will be President for two more
years, and he ain't budging from Iraq.

20,000 whole troops to play policeman in a city of how many millions? And what pray tell will this accomplish you blustering pinhead? Other than giving Bush cover, providing him with an excuse to blame the Al-Maliki government for not stepping up, nothing. Zilch. Zero.

Expecting America to surrender to the terrorists is like
expecting the Titanic to surrender to the iceberg, or for the Britannia
to surrender to the torpedoes.

You take action to avoid or otherwise negate the effects of icebergs and torpedoes, dumb fuck. You don't steer in to them. That way you don't sink.

Why don't you run along now and take on an iceberg.

14 And stop with the WWII analogies. Not only are they innaccurate, they are as tortured as visitors to Abu Ghraib.

American involvement in WWII was the direct result of a verifiable attack by a standing national military force. Our involvement in Iraq is directly tied to poor intelligence--which Bush no longer denies--and 19 guys with box cutters.

If you want to make an accurate parallel to WWII, for a change, the US would have invaded Germany in 1933 and Japan three years earlier.

15 Gleep: What tortures at Abu Ghraib? Are you talking about the terrible torture of having them strip naked and pile up or the horrible torture of wearing panties on their heads? Terrible, horrible, inhuman. Used to happen to every Marine Corps recruit. Please inform me of other horrible tortures the murdering islamics received. I really would like to know.

16 No, I'm talking about the tortures Saddam Hussein performed there.

17 Joke:


Nice try asshole. Your sophomoric argument is that anyone who supports a group needs to join it officially. Pay your dues to Code pink, bitch.


As far as being stretched thin and begging for new personnel goes, that only applies to the terrorists--who are fleeing Baghdad as I write this. Sign up, Jihadi John.



Reenlistment rates and reupping for iraq tours is at a record high in the American military--which is capable of mounting 3 - 4 major wars at once. Police actions in Third world countries don't even rate.


Stop supporting policies that support terrorists and call for getting American soldiers killed. You're probably already a member of Al Qaeda, but as a cyber propagandist you're a hopeless failure. Time for you to go on to bigger, grander failures. Become a faceless, forgotten martyr in Iraq, punk. Come on boy, take one up the ass for muhammad.


Of course, you claim to care deeply about American troops, so join the Marines and lend your scrawny arm.


The. Chickenhawk. Argument. Is. Gay.

18 Gleep: I now understand your comment. Bit touchy I am on that issue.
 
 
John Lyin: One of the reason we don't respond to your (getting old) chickenhawk comment is because many of us have already served. You freakin muslim hugging douche bag. You, of course didn't. Only thing you serve is your muslim boyfriend.

19 Creep:


_{"20,000 whole troops to play policeman in a city of how many millions? And what pray tell will this accomplish you blustering pinhead? Other than giving Bush cover, providing him with an excuse to blame the Al-Maliki government for not stepping up, nothing. Zilch. Zero."}


The terrorists disagree with you. They're skittering from Baghdad like cockroaches from a light because of the 21,500 troops heading to the city "of how many millions?" As if everybody in Baghdad is a terrorist, or the authorities need equal numbers to wipe them out.

Are you sure you don't want to revise your statement, Nostradumbass?


"_{You take action to avoid or otherwise negate the effects of icebergs and torpedoes, dumb fuck. You don't steer in to them. That way you don't sink."}


So avoiding terrorism is possible but fighting it is impossible? And you have the brass-bound pebbles to call me a dumb fuck?


If you don't like WWII comparisons--learn the definition of analogy, asshole--don't claim the reconstruction in Iraq is a failure before it's over. If it's still going on 20 years from now you can shoot your ignorant mouth off all you want. An accurate parallel to WWII would have the news media opposing the war from day one, and lying about its progress on a daily basis. Hitler and Tojo would have been beatified.


Spare me the tired bullshit about a war based on failed intelligence. The only failed intelligence is yours. President Bush never claimed his reason for overthrowing Saddam was WMD--which were found, by the way.


You sure are a cheap little tart, because you love to be spanked. Flamer.

20 President Bush never claimed his reason for overthrowing Saddam was WMD--which were found, by the way.

Then Bush is a liar because he agreed that WMD --the ones linked to yellow cake in his 2003 State of the Union address as he justified the reasons for war -- were never found.

Get psychiatric help. Soon.

21 Creep:


Bush listed more than a dozen reasons for invading Iraq, and 800 TONS OF YELLOWCAKE URANIUM WERE FOUND--3 TONS OF IT ENRICHED!


Get fucked, you pathetic leftist drone.

22 Wishing he were dead, commie red Creep has crept from the thread with apprehensive dread. I think he's being fed by giving Paul head.


800 TONS of yellowcake uranium, RETARD.