January 06, 2007
I've taken the liberty of overnighting her a mirror.
In the meantime, there is still the little matter of sorting through and nailing the AP for changing its stories by Hussein constantly, quietly and significantly until those new stories on the wires barely resemble the original stories. Still no comment from the Carroll regarding this. You can read 40 of those stories here, with some questions about each one.
Hence, Jamilgate, Round 2.
So what about them, Carroll? Got any indignation left to explain the wildly inconsistent and unverifiable reporting that led to the questions about Hussein's existence in the first place?
Didn't think so. I smell a possible print-version of Green Helmet Guy.
ht: LGF
Posted by: Good Lt. at
09:46 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 2 kb.
http://confederateyankee.mu.nu/archives/210517.php
You've missed part of the story. By my count the following are the number of bylines by name for the AP stories (subject to errors and omissions):
Thomas Wagner 11
No Byline 8
Sinan Salaheddin 5
Kim Gamel 4
Qassim Abdul-Aahra 2
Qais Al-Bashir 2
Sameer N. Yacoub 2
Lee Keath 1
Robert H. Reid 1
Tarek El-Tablawy 1
Patrick Quinn 1
Ryan Lenz 1
Bassem Mroue 1
How many stringers vs, regular AP reporters?
Will any of them admit to actually speaking with Capt. Jamil Hussein?
How come so many AP reporters can find this guy but no one else?
Where are they based? U.S.? Green Zone? Imbedded?
How many other Iraq war reporting bylines do they have?
What is their individual credibility and/or integrity?
Who has interviewed the above?
Any willing to go in the record?
If they are shown to misrepresent their source will it hurt their careers?
Posted by: Ed Davidson at January 06, 2007 11:55 AM (GwPnQ)
I'll keep mine eyes peeled for him. There are a few questionable names on that list. Keep us posted.
Posted by: Good Lt at January 06, 2007 07:10 PM (D0TMh)
34 queries taking 0.0303 seconds, 157 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









