February 11, 2006

ACLU Attacks Boy Scouts Again

Stop the ACLU reports that the ACLU is leading another assault on the Boy Scouts, sponsoring a lawsuit by a lesbian couple to have the Scouts thrown out of a San Diego park:

One can readily assume how this will be ruled; we are talking about the 9th Circuit here. The ACLU want to force the BSA to welcome professing homosexuals and even to recruit gay Scout leaders. They’d also like to erase the mention of “duty to God”. The ACLU is waging more than just a battle; it is waging a campaign. Since 1981, it has participated in at least 14 cases against the Boy Scouts.
Indeed, the Ninth Circus Court of Fools is notorious for softheaded rulings that bear little resemblance to mainstream jurisprudence. This is the court that wanted to strike the words, "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance.

The ACLU's past championing of the child molestation advocacy group, the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), makes their continued fascination with the BSA, and inserting homosexuals into its leadership, appear all the more sinister.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 01:16 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.

1 HOT ABERCROMBIE CHICK IS A MAN!!

HERE'S PROOF!!!!

http:// foreigndispatches.typepad...bercrombie.html

WHO IS MUSTANG GIRL MARIE????

Posted by: George W Bush at February 11, 2006 02:22 PM (ZZXfq)

2 Isn't the partner of the current head of the ACLU a 9th circuit judge?

Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at February 11, 2006 02:36 PM (aH6Zf)

3 Buy BSA Popcorn.

Support your local troops.

Posted by: Dave at February 11, 2006 03:19 PM (3yvId)

4 They picked a good place. The judges in Sandiego tend to be very anti American values. BSA has for over a century been a paradigm of American values.

The court in San Daiego recently sided with the Trial Lawyers and ACLU in a case against the City selling a hill with a Cross on it to a NGO so the cross would not have to be destroyed (as the ACLU have got another court to order). The court also said the City had to pay the Trial Lawyers and the ACLU almost $1,000,000 in legal fees. They will very likely win this case and then use it as stare decisis in othe cases throught the West.

Disclaimer: 55 years ago I was a Scout and 25 years ago my kids were Scouts. I am very biased in favor of BSA and GSA. I also have hated the America hating ACLU for 50 uyears. Other than these 2 items I have no dog in this fight.

Posted by: Rod Stanton at February 11, 2006 06:28 PM (lwdxR)

5 ACLU the Atheists.Communists and Lawlers Underground its founder is a boneified communists

Posted by: sandpiper at February 12, 2006 01:58 PM (08Fdo)

6 It seems to me that "renting" out public parkland (for next to nothing) to a group that has religious requirements for membership is obviously unconstitutional.

Posted by: Brian Westley at February 14, 2006 08:27 PM (COPAg)

7 "Religious requirements"? You were obviously never a Boy Scout, Brian. And only a deranged deiphobe would consider acknowledgement of the existence of a higher power (which is all that the Scouting admonition to being "reverent" amounts to) to be in violation of the Establishment clause.

I advocate suing atheists for pushing their personal belief system as a state religion.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 14, 2006 09:11 PM (RHG+K)

8 Sorry Bluto, requiring a belief in a god IS quite clearly a "religious requirement", and the US government can't subsidise a group that has religious requirement for membership. The BSA actively kicks out atheists, and the government can't give them sweetheart deals any more than they can special deals to an organization that excludes Jews.

Posted by: Brian Westley at February 26, 2006 05:19 AM (COPAg)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
32kb generated in CPU 0.0701, elapsed 0.1166 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.095 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.