January 28, 2007
DAVENPORT, Iowa -
Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday that
President Bush should withdraw all U.S. troops from
Iraq before he leaves office, asserting it would be "the height of irresponsibility" to pass the war along to the next commander in chief.
One word response? Kosovo.
Interesting, considering that she's officially in the run for '08. If she's in it to win, you'd think she'd want the troops to stay so that she could do the cut and run herself after she's inaugurated.
Posted by: Vinnie at
07:09 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
President Bush should withdraw all U.S. troops from
Iraq before he leaves office,
For one simple reason, she wants Bush to go down in history as the one who surrendered, not her. No such luck, Hilary.
Stay the course.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 28, 2007 08:39 PM (8e/V4)
"I came to this office to solve problems and not pass them on to future presidents and future generations."
You do want him to keep his word, don't you?
Posted by: Len at January 28, 2007 09:28 PM (kZ74G)
Oh, absolutely. Without a doubt.
Which is exactly why Bush will settle for nothing less than a complete victory.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 28, 2007 09:49 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Len at January 28, 2007 09:59 PM (kZ74G)
absurd thought -
God of the Universe thinks
Hillary can fight a war...
.
Posted by: USpace at January 28, 2007 09:59 PM (k40nO)
Put the finger in the air Hilary, Keep it up, things will change b-4 Nov. 08.
Shit, what a POL.
Posted by: Brad at January 28, 2007 11:44 PM (Ignlt)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHNnVdujcwk
Posted by: rtheyseryus at January 29, 2007 12:03 AM (MAPKL)
I wasn't aware that the definition had changed even once. But then again I'm not listening to the same people you are. Bush's definition of victory is a democratic and stable Iraq (same as always).
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 29, 2007 12:04 AM (8e/V4)
They can't tell the difference between victory in a single battle and victory in the overall war in general.
Hence their confusion, and the claim that the definition of victory keeps changing.
Posted by: Vinnie at January 29, 2007 01:31 AM (fdAim)
accept it. He's probably still wondering what "is" means too.
Posted by: Oyster at January 29, 2007 08:03 AM (YudAC)
Define "defeat." That's something the left has never done, because it would expose their empty rhetoric and outright treason for what they are.
I won't hold my breath waiting. You simps avoid that definition at all costs.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 30, 2007 12:33 AM (Dt3sl)
34 queries taking 0.0396 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
