March 04, 2007

Liveblogging the Secular Islam Summit

I'm at the Secular Islam Summit in St. Petersburg, Florida. I see that Gateway Pundit is here, too.

The show opened with Ibn Warraq and Irshad Manji. Both gave enjoyable and enlightening presentations. Warraq rejected the idea that our problems in the Middle East arise out of poverty, war or colonialism. He emphasized that a real push for human rights must be a principal component of the fight against the Islamists.

For her part, Manji emphasized the need to let reformers and potential reformers know that we will support them. "They are on our side," she says, "we need to let them know that we are on their side.

After Warraq and Manji, we heard from a panel discussion featuring Tawfik Hamid and Nibras Kazimi, and moderated by Phyllis Chesler. Tawfik Hamid is a former member of Jamaa Islamiya, which was led at the time by Ayman al Zawahiri. Nibras Kazimi is a visiting scholar at the Hudson Institute and a columnist for the New York Sun.

Hamid recounted the type of indoctrination delivered to young jihadists, including the jihadist slogan "thinking is for infidels." He lamented the lack of a theologically-based "peaceful Islam," and advocated the need for one.

Kazimi expressed a certain level of doubt that there will be an impetus for reform in Islam while the jihadists are ascendant and the West is in retreat. He noted the coming "demographic disaster" in many areas in the Middle East, where 60% of the population is under 20.

Chesler agreed with one questioner that the jihadis would need to experience both military and intellectual defeat before they could be considered defeated, but was convinced that the West has not yet developed the will to vigorously engage in either battle.

Posted by: Ragnar at 01:28 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 295 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Any of the *ahem* 'moderate' Brittish faction of "the faith" show up to lend their support to the effort?  I'd be mighty suprised if they did.

Get some of these Muslims to blog on their 'bretheren' over in England and the extremism that they propogate thru their use of Saudi textbooks in the schools.  My best to you guys bloggin there..

Posted by: mrclark at March 04, 2007 03:28 PM (QSqIX)

2 Most, probably not all,  of these people are interested in being Americans and want to keep America as their home, not reinvent where they came from.  I'm glad that they are speaking out.  More Americans of middle eastern decent need to. Funny thing about Saint Petersburg, the reason they don't have a proffessional football team is because then Tampa would want one........
 
Chenney & Lieberman 08!

Posted by: wb at March 04, 2007 04:12 PM (GRjob)

3 wb: You expect to much from muslims. They prefer to keep their protestations at the lowest level they can. If the shit hits the fan they can always refer back to what they quietly whispered. An effort to pacify what could happen if another 9/11 comes. At the same time letting the extremists know that they are not fanatical in their condemnation of them. Ate shrimp at a Cafe on Decatur str in the quarter last nite. Unbeliveable basket of shrimp and calimari $9.95. $1.00 strawberry daiquiris. Couldn't taste the booze.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 05, 2007 09:10 AM (criip)

4 wb: That's Cafe Maspero, 601 Decatur.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 05, 2007 09:15 AM (criip)

5 Grey R,
Some of these people have extended families back in Iran. They run the risk of retaliation for getting too loud ,too fast. As odd as it seems, there is still a good deal of travel back and forth through Turkey. If anyone ever wants to get a better idea about the American population that comes from Iran, going on 3rd generation now, go to LA, around PV. Most of these people ditched when the Sha was let down by carter.You know, back when Iran was little America?  Many of these are great Americans because they understand the value of opportunity and have a family value system that's remarkable. I was there at a Persian resturaunt and was amazed to see people get up and dance after the meal. Not some trance induced death to America thing, a real honest to goodness life is good and we are happy to be together kind of deal. It was very impressive. Not the " I'm glad it was you and not me" dance on a Canal Street funeral march.
They are giving shrimp dinners away? Damn!
What's on the menu for today other than red beans & rice?
Don't eat the crawfish this year...... okay, maybe some from the Atchafalaya. I'd stay away from crabs too, I don't think they found everyone that was a floater.
 
 
WB

Posted by: wb at March 05, 2007 10:14 AM (4DPNw)

6 Amen: Wouldn't eat any sharks either. Damn they are big this year. Wonder why? Hear there's good mudbugs around Lafayette. Much to expensive here. Strange. With only half the pre Katrina population one would thing that the price would be down. Fema checks must still be flowing. 

Posted by: greyrooster at March 05, 2007 08:09 PM (criip)

7 Pretty simple, primary nurseries experianced a food increase with fish and crutstation  levels going up after inshore shrimping was stoppped. Efforts at improving water quality may be making someheadway too. scallops are makeing a comeback which is a great sign. More food means more, bigger top of the food chain predators.Look for more shallow and fresh water bull shark encounters as that starts to balance out the other way as more larger fish deplete initial abundance. or....... maybe it's President Bush's fault!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1  

Posted by: wb at March 06, 2007 11:38 AM (dFKOS)

8 It be Bush's fault cus he be de man who lef dem bodies in de water an conditioned dem sharks to eaten dem peoples. Jus ax em. He be de one. he say fuck dem peoples in nawlins cus dem no vote fer em. he be racist mofucka.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 06, 2007 10:59 PM (wTIrf)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
34kb generated in CPU 0.015, elapsed 0.0759 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0697 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.