May 20, 2006
Update cat vs Dog. Wonkette is all "males" now. I still think Michelle can take em.
Posted by: Howie at
11:31 AM
| Comments (65)
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 20, 2006 11:47 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Allah at May 20, 2006 11:48 AM (CbBW/)
Score one--a big one--for Michelle Malkin!
I would have commented at Wonkette's, by the way, but I'm not in the "club." Yet another demonstration of liberal openness.
Posted by: Brett Bullington at May 20, 2006 12:03 PM (/QYGF)
Posted by: Gerry at May 20, 2006 12:11 PM (CI4Lt)
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 20, 2006 12:25 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 20, 2006 12:51 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 20, 2006 12:53 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Thrill at May 20, 2006 12:56 PM (DYb4r)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 20, 2006 12:58 PM (FCC6c)
Posted by: Graeme at May 20, 2006 01:19 PM (V4NnT)
Pretty shallow actually.
Hey what a minute. Does IM have a swastika on his forehead?
Posted by: Garner at May 20, 2006 01:35 PM (aYuiN)
Gasp! Oh! no! Here we go again! Where is Katherine Harris when you need her?
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 20, 2006 01:47 PM (FCC6c)
Hey Improbulus, you have a good steak knife? I'll return it nice and clean
Posted by: Garner at May 20, 2006 01:55 PM (aYuiN)
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 20, 2006 01:56 PM (rUyw4)
And let me say I find it highly amusing that anyone responsible for Jawa would criticize the tastesfulness of some other sites posting board. Jawa features numerous posters who advocate genocide, denigrate other religions, and make off color (and pretty funny) references. Oh, and casual references to the mentally retarded.
Posted by: jd at May 20, 2006 02:43 PM (GZdxw)
Besides...I don't think there is much market for a butch videoblog at least not from a political view.
Posted by: mrclark at May 20, 2006 02:44 PM (tKHno)
Posted by: Asgerd at May 20, 2006 05:47 PM (HxJi6)
I'm guessing he's about 12 anyway.
Posted by: MiB at May 20, 2006 05:48 PM (B9sDR)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 20, 2006 07:29 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: MiB at May 20, 2006 09:12 PM (B9sDR)
Posted by: danish at May 21, 2006 01:27 AM (umHZb)
But when somebody makes offensive jokes towards her, it's like, totally different. No doubt because she made some complex moral reasoning weighing racist speech versus anti-religious imagery that she didn't let us in on, and not because she has a wildly inconsistent worldview that all Republicans don't not have.
Well y'know what, if Wonkette can't make racist sexist jokes about Michelle Malkin, the terrorists win.
I do love this argument that conservatives have become fond of lately- "Sure, in general we are pretty intolerant towards all non-whites, non-Christians, intellectuals, immigrants, dirty poor people, dirty French people, etc... But look at how intolerant all of them are towards us!" They then take the most outrageous liberal statement they can find, even if they have to scavenge for forum trolls and go through their anonymous hate mail, and then hold it up as the mainstream liberal view while ignoring anything approaching reasoned critique.
Hear that sound? That's the sound of democracy dying slowly and painfully. Thank you conservative punditry!
Posted by: Blooper at May 21, 2006 01:48 AM (S2+uh)
Posted by: mike at May 21, 2006 05:22 AM (w3HDb)
Wonkette still has as much a right to made bad jokes as anyone. And if Malkin is being a hipocrite or anything else is beside the point. She still has a right to be offended as much as you have a right to be critical of her voicing of her offense. I noticed you didn't mention that she didn't stoop to the same level in her complaint. Just look at the guy's picture and tell me it isn't ripe for comment.
You complain bitterly about the 'supposed' vital importance of Mohammed cartoons being "shoved down our throats" and then assert the 'not so supposed' importance of Wonkette's right to make racist, sexist jokes by insering the "terrorists win" argument? Your argument would only be "cogent" and "reasoned critique" if you recognized both sides as being petty while you're casting stones in this direction.
Posted by: Oyster at May 21, 2006 05:38 AM (YudAC)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 21, 2006 07:35 AM (0yYS2)
And when they send emails from a safe distance, slurring them with labels like childish, evil, racist, xenophobic socialists. [Yawn]
Posted by: Oyster at May 21, 2006 08:18 AM (YudAC)
Thanks for demonstrating my point that Liberals in general lack the intellectual capacity to argue cogently for their positions.
There are a few exceptions. You aren't one of them.
Posted by: Brett Bullington at May 21, 2006 09:49 AM (/QYGF)
I didn't find the cartoons were "shoved down our throats" at all. The only part of the story that got shoved down our throats was the part where people who previously had no problems slandering Jesus and christianity suddenly "found religion" and refused to print the cartoons out of "respect" for islam/muslims. That's the part that got shoved down our throat. With that kind of double standards towards christians no wonder they hate your fucking guts.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 21, 2006 09:55 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: jd at May 21, 2006 09:57 AM (GZdxw)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 21, 2006 10:11 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Hangtown Bob at May 21, 2006 02:57 PM (CcSNC)
At what point is publishing anything "shoving it down peoples' throats"?
Is publishing a story about the hated Yankees shoving it down people's throats? Is publishing a conservative viewpoint in San Francisco, or a liberal viewpoint in Kansas shoving it down people's throats?
Others have already noted the rather marked difference between what Malkin has done (object) and what those who opposed the cartoons have done (burned embassies, threatened lives).
If your nuanced view of reality is such as to not recognize the basic, qualitative differences between the two, then perhaps the fault lies, not with Malkin, but in yourself?
Posted by: Lurking Observer at May 21, 2006 05:20 PM (3bV3I)
It was HYSTERICAL.
Thanks for pointing it out to me - I stopped checking Malkin's site for dumb remarks a while ago.
I think it was the whole illegal-immigrants-are-al-Qaeda thing where I just couldn't take the BS anymore and de-linked her.
Nice to know she's still a nutjob.
Posted by: Theo at May 21, 2006 08:09 PM (7AEHv)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 22, 2006 05:09 AM (0yYS2)
While they beg and demand money from the rest of the country they sit on their asses and complain. Damn liberals educated them that way. Now they are worthless to themselves or anyone else.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 22, 2006 06:07 AM (J4a4p)
here's the silver lining to Nagin reelection:
"The defeat of Mitch Landrieu is the latest setback for Dean's often criticized field operation."
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash5no.htm
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 22, 2006 08:06 AM (8e/V4)
I swear, Improbulus - you make the BEST death threats on the web. Really, kudos.
You are the toughest guy to ever sit at a keyboard.
There's so much machismo wafting off of you, I can't even smell the Cheetos and Mountain Dew on your breath.
Posted by: Theo at May 22, 2006 09:30 AM (7AEHv)
Posted by: Howie at May 22, 2006 09:50 AM (D3+20)
Posted by: Howie at May 22, 2006 09:58 AM (D3+20)
That's a double negative, Howie.
You're saying I do believe in something, and for that, I thank you.
We won't even get into your dyslexic sentence structure.
Posted by: Theo at May 22, 2006 10:01 AM (7AEHv)
Posted by: Howie at May 22, 2006 10:09 AM (D3+20)
Pardon me for not knowing the lyrics to an obscure John Cougar Mellencamp song.
You do know Mellencamp's an evil liberal, right?
Posted by: Theo at May 22, 2006 10:19 AM (7AEHv)
Posted by: Howie at May 22, 2006 10:24 AM (D3+20)
Theo,
with that comment you unintentionally stumble onto some truth. You see, IM's rantings are more humorous than macho. He does make the best death threats on the web. The one about kicking you into a trench actually made me chuckle out loud!
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 22, 2006 11:32 AM (8e/V4)
That's my major pet peeve about Liberals blogging. They make the constant personal attacks, and then when you hit back that just proves in their own minds what meanies the rightwingers are! Morons.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 22, 2006 11:34 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 22, 2006 11:41 AM (FCC6c)
If there's one thing all Republicans love, it's a good death threat. A death threat on an abortion doctor will get you 1,000 megadittos!
It takes a pretty sick individual to find death threats "humorous" (not to mention moderators letting them stand), but I think my "Mountain Dew and Cheetos" remark pretty much describes how threatening I find them.
Posted by: Theo at May 22, 2006 11:53 AM (7AEHv)
you libs don't seem to mind the death threats by muslims-- actually carried out-- nearly as much as you seem to mind the faux death threats by IM and seemingly non-existent death threats by christians against abortion doctors (none actually carried out since the Crusades, apparently). Hmmm, I wonder why.
And if finding IM humorous makes me a sick individual, what does that make you Libs who ignore death threats actually carried out by muslims? Where was the Liberal intelligentsia and art community when Theo Van Gogh was butchered in broad daylight? Where is the Liberal intelligentsia and art community when critics are forced into hiding for fear of their lives? Crickets chirping, that's where. So you can imagine what I think of your "outrage" about what a sick individual I am.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 22, 2006 12:09 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 22, 2006 12:16 PM (8e/V4)
Here: I disapprove of fatwas. They're bad.
Happy?
And here's a little primer on violence at abortion clinics:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
Murder, arson, bombings, assault - you'll LOVE it.
Posted by: Theo at May 22, 2006 12:25 PM (7AEHv)
I see. And yet you can impute to me the threats by the anti-abortion fringe ("A death threat on an abortion doctor will get you 1,000 megadittos!"). That's a neat trick!
And I can counter by imputing to you the eco--terrorists whom you Lefties love so much, who make the anti-abortion fringe look like rank amateurs. According to your website and this one at http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.17751/article_detail.asp, your environmental fringe has caused more economic damage in one month than the anti-abortion fringe has caused in over 20 years.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 22, 2006 12:42 PM (8e/V4)
And again, you try to create controversy where there is none. (Michelle Malkin would be flipping hamburgers if that didn't work on you people.)
I don't support eco-terrorism any more than you do abortion terrorists.
That you've dipped in that well twice regarding me would suggest that while you may or may not be a "sick individual", your debate skills are clearly lacking.
Posted by: Theo at May 22, 2006 12:52 PM (7AEHv)
But clearly all my comments are to be taken dead seriously (no pun intended), like the one where kicking you into a trench was amusing. Now that's what I call debating skills! You've mastered them.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 22, 2006 01:02 PM (8e/V4)
P.S. You John Wayne characitures are all alike! Any disagreement and the trigger-happy finger goes for the 6-shooter. Go back to your sandboxes.
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 22, 2006 01:24 PM (FCC6c)
I wouldn't hesitate a second to off your sorry asses though, but I also wouldn't waste lead on you either, unless I could get more than one with the same shot to avoid wasting a bullet. And I don't make threats, just statements, though you libturds are too stupid to know the difference. You are my enemies and can expect no mercy when the time comes, and that right soon, with any luck.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 22, 2006 06:02 PM (0yYS2)
" Oh no! no! Those were'nt threats! I was just making statements! "
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 22, 2006 07:01 PM (FCC6c)
Posted by: greyrooster at May 23, 2006 06:12 PM (BEvWK)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 23, 2006 08:24 PM (FCC6c)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 24, 2006 05:34 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 24, 2006 05:35 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 24, 2006 09:30 AM (FCC6c)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 24, 2006 09:32 AM (FCC6c)
Aw but wait. Looking closely at Theo's ramblings I detect a heavy female leaning.
Aw, Haw. Theo is either a woman or a faggot that wishes to be one.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 24, 2006 09:16 PM (8MCDk)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 24, 2006 10:05 PM (FCC6c)
Posted by: greyrooster at May 25, 2006 08:41 PM (pzM6K)
34 queries taking 0.0529 seconds, 220 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.