August 19, 2006

Lebanese Army Ordered to 'Stand With' Hizballah

Cross-posted from The Dread Pundit Bluto

Even the UK's rabidly leftwing Guardian Unlimited seems to find this alarming:

An internal Lebanese army statement, circulated among forces in the past week, has called for troops to stand "alongside your resistance and your people who astonished the world with its steadfastness and destroyed the prestige of the so-called invincible army after it was defeated".
While the UN peacekeeping force is touted in the West as a deterrent to Hizballah terrorism with a mission to disarm Hizballah, Hizballah's leaders and supporters within the Lebanese army see the peacekeepers as reinforcements in their war with Israel:
The UN's expected deployment of 15,000 troops is seen as an additional force to assist in Lebanon's defence against Israel. "We are happy with such a large force to provide sufficient deterrent to Israeli aggression," said Gen Kader.
This article is a strong indication that those who opposed a quick-fix ceasefire were absolutely correct. One more thing, Hizballah has decided to add "ordinary Americans" to its hitlist of infidel enemies:
Ordinary Americans are now enemies of Hizbullah, a Shia cleric said yesterday at the funerals of the 29 victims of the July 29 Qana bombing, above.

"American people, you are partners in these massacres, you are partners in this war," said Nabil Kaouk, the leading Hizbullah official in southern Lebanon. "After this no Lebanese can trust an American. You are all murderers and criminals."

Thanks ever so much to the useful idiots in the West who rushed in to rescue Hizballah, and especially to the Western media giants who, through sloth or stupidity, allowed Hizballah to infiltrate their organizations.

Posted by: Bluto at 11:04 AM | Comments (35) | Add Comment
Post contains 272 words, total size 2 kb.

1 While C. Rice may have been well-intentioned in trying to bring the focus of the security-council (another farce) on the nuclear ambitions of the Mullahcracy of Iran; she may have really f&%ked up in restraining Israel from its natural right of self-defence.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at August 19, 2006 11:45 AM (Bp6wV)

2

Excerpted and linked at Old War Dogs.

Posted by: Bill Faith at August 19, 2006 12:22 PM (n7SaI)

3 So.. Now that the 2 have become 1, are they going to change their names to "Lezbollah" afterall?

I'm going to link this to my new blog too, Jedi Meditations,  momentarily.  (when I say "new".. I mean it.)



Posted by: JeepThang at August 19, 2006 12:37 PM (yZQoS)

4 >>>who astonished the world with its steadfastness and destroyed the prestige of the so-called invincible army after it was defeated".

The IDF has been running on fumes since the Yom Kippur war. They need to get their house in order before they lose what little deterrence they have left.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at August 19, 2006 12:49 PM (ILns2)

5 If you see through the psy-ops crap, and you see (potentially, be it delusional or not) the enemy being set up... ethically, you keep your mouth shut.  Yes?

Posted by: QC at August 19, 2006 01:43 PM (LoKA7)

6 The French will be standing strong with Hizbullah too! You knew they would be the first to get down and kiss the arab worlds ass.

Posted by: The Boodge at August 19, 2006 02:06 PM (wPWL0)

7 A 5th grade American classroom in the year 2010.

"Now class, please open your books to page 37. There you will see an old map of the Middle East. Now look at the modern map on page 38. Who can tell me why Lebanon, Syria, and Iran are gone?"

Posted by: eman at August 19, 2006 02:25 PM (SD4ZE)

8 This isn't going to make me popularbut:
Condi Rice has been captured by the traitorous culture of the State Department. She sold Israel down the river.

Posted by: Keith at August 19, 2006 03:15 PM (gofp3)

9
Posted by: Keith at August 19, 2006 03:15 PM


You make a bold statement. Back it up.

Posted by: QC at August 19, 2006 03:27 PM (LoKA7)

10 Well, QC, I'm not going to go to the barricades to defend an opinion.
Looking at the shameful record of State--especially where the Saudis are concerned--and looking at the ceasefire deal that Rice was so involved in, the conclusion I reached looks perfectly reasonable.
Do your own research into the record of the State Department.

Posted by: Keith at August 19, 2006 03:57 PM (gofp3)

11 Keith,

Armpits and a$$holes, armpits and a$$holes...

Others in a probably better vantage point would disagree entirely. E.G. www.yonitheblogger.com
He said on Hewitt's show that the US did more than the Isreali gov. expected they would.

Garduneh Mehr,
The US gave Israel weeks to do whatever they wanted to do. Israel dropped the ball on their own damn feet. I don't see how short of actually deploying US troops into Leb would your opinion be satisfied. Israel was restraint by its own polity and their own misguided sense of loyalty to the UN in signing onto the cease fire.

You wanna know what the first sign of a loser is? Yep, blaming others.

Posted by: adamthemad at August 19, 2006 04:32 PM (mg8C4)

12 Israel should have finished them off while they had a chance!!

Posted by: phil at August 19, 2006 04:42 PM (cj19w)

13 State delayed arms resupply to Israel. The ceasefire agreement is a joke and I simply don't believe that the U.S. wasn't aware that yet another token U.N. force would allow hezbollah to regroup and re-arm.
If that agreement is the best we in the West could do, then God help us. We're now subservient to a corrupt U.N.

Posted by: Keith at August 19, 2006 04:52 PM (gofp3)

14 "State delayed arms resupply to Israel."

Again, you make a bold statement. Back it up. Source it. Link it.

Posted by: QC at August 19, 2006 05:40 PM (LoKA7)

15 QC, again--do your own research and refute it.
I read too many sources to be bothered going back and finding something for someone too lazy to do their own work.

Posted by: Keith at August 19, 2006 07:38 PM (gofp3)

16 If the Hezbollah "disarms", won't its veterans just join the Lebanese Army?

Posted by: anarchistmanifesto at August 19, 2006 07:41 PM (IV+rS)

17 For QC:
State Dept. Wants to Delay Arms to Israel
According to the New York Times, State Department officials are working to delay arms shipments to Israel: Israel wants hastened shipment of US rockets: NYT.

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=22054_State_Dept._Wants_to_Delay_Arms_to_Israel

Posted by: Keith at August 19, 2006 07:44 PM (gofp3)

18 Nobody who is a regular here is surprised by this. Many of us here on this blog said weeks ago that Hizb'Allah had de facto control over Lebanon.

Posted by: jesusland joe at August 19, 2006 07:44 PM (rUyw4)

19 Hondo: Talk to me buddy. Who won?

Posted by: greyrooster at August 19, 2006 10:28 PM (gT5i+)

20 The fact France is only sending 200 troops tells you they know this is a pause before the next phase of combat. They do not want to be in the middle.

Posted by: SeeMonk at August 19, 2006 11:40 PM (n4VvM)

21 >>>be it delusional or not) the enemy being set up... ethically, you keep your mouth shut. Yes?

Hard to say, given I haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at August 20, 2006 12:02 AM (ILns2)

22 I hope someone in the Treasury Dept. kept the reciept for that $50 Mil we pledged to send to Lebanon...

Posted by: Stewed Hamm at August 20, 2006 12:54 AM (IoR5s)

23 greyrooster

Try this - I know who lost! Lebanon.

A sorry excuse for a country that only really exists on paper and in the minds of the hopelessly naive status quo'ers.

GR - check out the real history of lebanon for '43 on. If not for the US & Israel being the Great Satan & Little Satan - the muslims would be focusing their rage at the other interloper in the area - tiny Lebanon (the tiny Satan).

Pity Lebanon - who is their benefactor and supporter? Answer: France n' the Euros ..... now that's oh soooo funny .... and oh sooooo sad!

Posted by: hondo at August 20, 2006 02:51 AM (XrexX)

24 Oh - Olmert is also a hopelessly naive status quo'er - who pulled his punches in a lame attempt to "not" destabilize the Lebanonese govt., which was only a facade to begin with. Guess that makes Olmert a loser.

Posted by: hondo at August 20, 2006 03:05 AM (XrexX)

25 You are talking about the topic and not the Staten Island Yankees AA - right?

Posted by: hondo at August 20, 2006 03:08 AM (XrexX)

26 Yea. And you're right about the loser.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 20, 2006 09:15 AM (FTx5X)

27 greyroster

Truth is - the ball game was more interesting. I love minor leaque and I truly love Little League - makes it easier to forget there is a Lebanon, Olmert, Israel, Huzzbaby etc - at least for awhile.

Posted by: hondo at August 20, 2006 12:04 PM (XrexX)

28 As soon as the cease fire was being talked about in conjunction with the UN I knew it was a Victory for Hezbollah! I can't imagine what Bush and Rice were thinking, Hell, they obviously Weren't!

Maybe Isreal was gettin it's Ass whipped, it's the only reason I can think of for not letting them Destroy Hezbollah! If Beruit Need to be Turned into DUST, so be it!

I think this also needs to be applied in Iraq, It's time to stop letting our soldiers stand by and have pot shots taken at them!

I'd have a long talk with the Powers in Iraq and let them know just how it was going to work from now on, The Shit Holes in Irag are going to Be DUST!

Period, End of Story!! Drop the Leaflets, give the warning and the Turn them into a Parking Lot!

Fuckem

I'm damn tired of watching our soldiers being Killed, Lettem Loose!

Posted by: Mike at August 20, 2006 01:11 PM (w3HDb)

29 >>>QC, again--do your own research and refute it.

I hear you. I've spend what feels like endless hours arguing with Libs, providing source after source. But all they feel the need to do is shoot down the sources on trivialities. But they never back their own shyte up. We should just take them at their own schtoopid word it seems. We're arguing with ignoramuses.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at August 20, 2006 01:32 PM (ILns2)

30 Hope the US money pledged to rebuild the Leb infrastructure at least makes Hizb'allah comfy and cozy while the UN facilitates re-arming them.

/sarc

Calamity and disaster don't quite seem like potent enough words for this situation, so I guess farce will have to do.

Posted by: Hucbald at August 20, 2006 02:43 PM (Qb6YN)

31 Nothing new on this post. We knew this weeks ago.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 20, 2006 07:34 PM (IcUVJ)

32 Wussies just like us! Doesn't anyone have the balls to carry a war to a finale!?  Fore!  L o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  0

Posted by: Last gasp Larry at August 20, 2006 11:37 PM (gLMre)

33 J. Carlos--ain't that the truth!

Posted by: Keith at August 21, 2006 04:31 AM (kZ4Pe)

34 szuqjotp ixmwpzjbs nfxerbz mliqsrjdp bsmux wrophs jpieamuqc

Posted by: goxsdaium vdqptaw at December 20, 2006 11:00 PM (o1nqF)

35 byce orwmlukbh anetoyxkq dzotsjfnw njpzmg ughvdfks joab

Posted by: fbgamh cgxvq at December 20, 2006 11:17 PM (BMKT6)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
44kb generated in CPU 0.0159, elapsed 0.0802 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0706 seconds, 190 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.