February 25, 2007
LOS ANGELES – Korean-American community leaders said they plan to launch a protest against the publisher of a popular South Korean comic book that contains anti-Semitic images. “I don’t have words to describe the outrage I feel,†said Yohngsohk Choe, co-chairman of the Korean American Patriotic Action Movement in the USA. ...Kudos to Korean Americans for standing up against anti-semitism. Unfortunately, there are communities in this country that tacitly, and even expressly, endorse this kind of thing.Korean-American community leaders said they were disgusted by the images and would speak to officials at South Korea’s consulate in Los Angeles and in Seoul. “They have the potential to harm good relationships we have established with our Jewish-American neighbors in Los Angeles,†Choe said of the images.
That said, I'm not willing to endorse government censorship of this stuff. Exposing the author, shedding light on his bigotry and expressing community condemnation has a lot of value. Further, the author's bosses may want to address whether a man who writes this sort of thing should be working as a college professor.
Posted by: Ragnar at
11:28 AM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 2 kb.
This is indeed how civilized people treat one another. Hats off to them.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 25, 2007 12:42 PM (vixLB)
Posted by: wb at February 25, 2007 05:08 PM (Pl+g3)
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 06:45 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 09:01 PM (JVqe0)
No, that was Teddy Roosevelt's take on the subject.
The US Constitution is not subservient to an inscription calling for America to take in the world's wretched refuse.
"If they are Americans first then fuck them all." Is that your credo?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 09:18 PM (Dt3sl)
Thank you for your suggestion. I want you to know that I have given you words careful consideration and used them as another viewpoint to look at my summation. I am always willing to do that and am actually greatful when presented with an opportunity to do so.
I must say that I am still drawn to the same conclusion that there can be no other thing that goes in front of being an American. I know it sounds rather Gump but it's that simple, at least for me being of a simple mind and still an eager student to those of careful and more learned considerations, such as yourself. I realize there are other factors that always come into play but believe that unity in word leads to until in deeds. My greatest hope, dear Professor, is that it will lead to untiy in equality FOR ALL in the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness. But I am an eteranl optimist willing to choke the living shit out of any mother fucker that needs it so that we can all get along..... But again, thank you for your input and I hope that I will be able to keep reading and enjoying your insights. They are reassuring and that in and of itself has a positive affect.
Yes Sir I am with you, USA all the way!
Posted by: wb at February 25, 2007 11:16 PM (Pl+g3)
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 11:17 PM (ZxuJ4)
I think the point here is that whatever they may be called, hyphenated or otherwise, America has to come first. Teddy wasn't saying you had to renouce the bit of your old home that gives you a bit of color, but he was making it clear that being American means you are as one with other Americans. Imagine if he was saying it like this; German-American is not OK, but German-American is.
Emphasis should be on what unites us, and what we hold dear, and in common. That is why the Pledge of Allegience is something I feel should be expected from any patriot. Just to be clear, your freedom of religion should allow you to say it without the 'Under God' part, if you so choose. Whether you include that part of the pledge or not, you should have no problem with the rest of it IF your a patriot.
Anyone who can't say at least the shorter version, I don't see how you can call yourself an American. Clearly your 'national' loyalty is to something other than the Republic. Clearly, the Republic is secondary to some other 'political' affiliation, or cause. Possibly the Republic is a rival to your 'other' cause, and you are in fact living as a traitor. Maybe your a member of the Islamic Thinkers Society, and standing on, and ripping up the Flag is just your way of getting aquainted with the neighbors. They are Muslim-Americans, not Muslim-Americans. That is how I see it.
So be happy if your Irish, or Norse, or African. But be extra specially happy your an American, and make sure your BOLD about it. I think Teddy would approve this message.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 11:19 PM (2OHpj)
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 11:22 PM (2OHpj)
TR ran on a "no hypenated American "platform, they were a little worried about loyalty to the Kaiser Willhelm. Those words couldn't be more true than they are today.
So has anyone thought about a Chenney/ (?) ticket for 08? I wouldn't rule out a hillary /sharpton ticket. That was the reason he went to PR to protest navy bomb training and got thrown in jail, that's also when he lost the weight. I can hear it now, bitchery saying" tell you what fat boy, you get me the black and hispanic vote and you're in with me, oh yeah, and lose some weight too...." At least he can run as a black man and not a man who wants to be all black but isn't.... allblackoboma hmmmm has nice ring to it.
Posted by: wb at February 25, 2007 11:26 PM (Pl+g3)
Consider it an honorary title then. Bestowed by WBU. And for the record, it means teacher and that's what you do with your posts. You get others to think, that is a gift and I simply wanted to acknowledge it and thank you for using in a way that is positive. If you'll excuse me it's back to the gutter.....
Posted by: wb at February 25, 2007 11:33 PM (Pl+g3)
No, that was Teddy Roosevelt's take on the subject.
The US Constitution is not subservient to an inscription calling for America to take in the world's wretched refuse.
"If they are Americans first then fuck them all." Is that your credo?
Address what I wrote, you slithering worm. Don't try to change the subject and deflect things back on me.
Your pathetic "rules for radicals" don't work on me. Not everybody is an idiot like you.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 26, 2007 01:50 AM (Dt3sl)
A question about this:
"your freedom of religion should allow you to say it without the 'Under God' part, if you so choose."
I've never heard it said otherwise! Are you saying it wouldn't offend you if you were at a ball game and someone next to you replaced "God" with "Allah" or "Durka Durka!!" ?
Posted by: osamabinthere at February 26, 2007 03:27 AM (ZxuJ4)
durka durka? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA....
Posted by: wb at February 26, 2007 09:51 AM (1+5On)
One note on the comments, however; is that the whole argument against describing Americans of Korean descent (gee, that flows off the tongue, doesn't it?) as "Korean-Americans" is damn silly, IMO. Feel free to inject any racial/cultural/religious descriptor, but hell, it's the English language that says the adjective (in this case, Korean) goes before the noun (American).
If the word order is supposed to indicate the intensity of loyalty and patriotism, then what do we call all those non-hyphenated "Americans" who enjoy the luxury and privelege of their self-loathing, revionistic, apoplectic view, speech, and actions under the security of their birth and/or citizenship? I know what I would call them, but it sure wouldn't be a choice on a census form! All I'm saying is make character and actions be the judge, not the word order in the label used to distinguish themselves in a multicultural society.
Posted by: JC at February 26, 2007 02:23 PM (A19dg)
"Are you saying it wouldn't offend you if you were at a ball game and someone next to you replaced "God" with "Allah" or "Durka Durka!!" ?"
To be quite honest, while Islam offends me with its inherent violence, anyone who is pledgeing allegience to the Flag, AND to the Republic for which it stands, is making the correct promise. If they choose to sanctify that promise with thier religious belief, or swear by what they hold as sacred when the make that pledge, then I'm fine with that. I admit that the words "Under Allah" make no sense when held in contrast to the national character of the last few hundred years. But if that is what binds your pledge, so be it.
Clarifying that, our Constitution is the soul of the Republic, and Sharia can't ever replace that. My red line for allowing a Muslim credentials as a moderate, are if that Muslim is against the imposition of Sharia, and opposses its subversion of non-Sharia legal systems. In America, that means that if you pledge allegianceto the Flag, and the Republic, you also pledge allegience to the US Constitution, which includes the First Amendment and it's 'establishment clause'.
So my bias against Islam is moderated by my wish for all of us to have our individual liberty. If you pray to Allah, fine, but if your an American, make the pledge, and if you can't accept US Constitutional law, then your pledge is hollow. If you didn't mean it, and you should go somewhere where your ideas are welcome.
Osama, I've had friends with religious beliefs you can't hardly mention in public. I've been present for religious ceremonies that would have got me thrown out of Church if anyone knew. I don't condemn free exercise by wierd religions. They don't create violent political organizations, train terrorists, and fund crimes against humanity. Freedom of religious choice is a sacred right in America. Crimes commited because of your religion, are still crimes. Murder remains murder! Rape remains rape! Terrorism remains terrorism.
If I put magic runes on bullets before I load them into a thirty round clip, I'm well within my Constitutional rights. If I shoot those bullets in commission of a crime, I've gone outside the law. If I use Voodoo to turn my neighbor into a zombie (ignore implausibility) I'm commiting a crime. If I cut off my Son's head because he has rejected Allah, I have commited murder. (note plausability).
Now you have me posting long again. Geez!
Your freedom to be a Nazi stops when you want to overthrow the US Constution. THERE! Pledge Allegience dammit! And don't lie! If you can't do that, your not a citizen, and need to find yourself a new homeland you CAN be loyal to.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 26, 2007 07:52 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 26, 2007 07:54 PM (2OHpj)
I ignored your flaming, so now you're going to pretend to ignore me. Stupid leftist. Who do you think you're fooling, you passive aggresive cunt?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 27, 2007 03:27 AM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 28, 2007 12:33 AM (ZxuJ4)
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 28, 2007 02:24 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 28, 2007 05:55 PM (ZxuJ4)
34 queries taking 0.0704 seconds, 176 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.