jawa.mee.nu

April 18, 2007

Jawa = "Zionist Internet Spies"

It's funny because its true. This idiot decides that the campaign against Hassan El-Najjar was because we at The Jawa Report are "Zionist Internet Spies":

They're numerous, they're zionist, and they're goal is to seek and shutdown all internet opposition. They're Zionist Internet Spies and they've struck again.

Emphasis in the original. Yes, indeed we have struck again! Now excuse us while we gather at a secret conclave and make matzah balls filled with the blood of Muslim children.........

But before we do, he offers this irony:

Neither Al-Najjar nor any other American should have to constantly declare their undivided allegiance to America in order to criticize that sh*tty little state called israel.
This is going to backfire badly on those little nazis.

Nazis. That's funny. But just to remind readers, neither I nor any one at The Jawa Report ever called for Al-Najjar to cease publishing al Jazeerah. What we called for was his firing from a state funded college. Which in the context of any other war would not be considered nearly harsh enough since sedition has always been a prosecutable offense under war time conditions.

And not because he didn't support Israel, but because 1) he openly supported terrorists 2) he openly supported jihadis in Iraq who are killing the men and women of the U.S. military. Now, he also was opposed to Israel, but that was not the basis of our opposition.

It's funny how those that oppose the existence of a secular Jewish state also tend to support terrorists and the killing of American soldiers....

Posted by: Rusty at 01:19 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 263 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Go back in memory to prior to the year 1989 when the Soviet Union went into Afghanistan didn't the US support the "Jihadis" or the "Mujahideen", as they called them back then, when they were fighting the Soviets to free their country? Does that make the US government "Terrorists", for abading and supporting terrorists? Or they free to twist and play with words whenever and however they please?

Posted by: Adam at April 18, 2007 03:11 PM (4BgBt)

2 No the resistance we supported was what is now called the Northern Alliance. That is why we had connections when we invaded. Both groups fought the Soviets, but our support was directed to this guy. Not the taliban or Bin Laden.

Nice try though.....

Posted by: Darth Odie at April 18, 2007 03:28 PM (YHZAl)

3 I think we need a patch or rather an insignia denoting the famed and the feared division of the Munuvians. How about the letters ZIS with a mouse wrapped around it with bullets or something flying out of it.

Posted by: birdhurd at April 18, 2007 03:44 PM (8/pgM)

4 I prefer to be called a "JOOO LOVER", it sounds so nice, rolls off the tongue, and has a possitive ring to it.

Posted by: Mrs Abe Froman at April 18, 2007 03:48 PM (ynpvy)

5 Not jew lover, entire blog evidence of hooka use.
*>

G

Posted by: gerald at April 18, 2007 04:58 PM (h0BrM)

6 Adam. The Mujahidee were engaging in war against Soviet forces in the traditional insurgency style. Terrorism, despite the medias complete ignorance, has a specific definition in political terms. The simple definition is intentionally targeting civilians so as to create terror to advance a political goal.

Posted by: Randman at April 18, 2007 05:20 PM (Sal3J)

7 I call for his execution. He is a traitor and enemy of the United States. Hang him high.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2007 06:28 PM (MTHRd)

8 You make your matzah balls from the blood of muslim children? Jeezlepete, just e-mail me for the recipe.......

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 18, 2007 09:33 PM (K/lgF)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

32kb generated in CPU 0.0156, elapsed 0.0857 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0758 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

April 18, 2007

Recent Comments