July 14, 2006
JERUSALEM (AP)--Ehud Olmert's effort to free three captured soldiers has become a broad campaign to alter the strategic balance of the Middle East - an enormous gamble for an Israeli prime minister facing growing domestic pressure to hit Islamic militants hard.Now, I'm not really sure how one goes about "putting Hezbollah out of business," but I'm gonna go out on a limb here and surmise that the IDF has a damn good idea, and I have pity (well, not much, but some--actually pretty much zero) for anyone with the incredibly poor judgment to get in their way.Israel's assault on Lebanon, which has already killed 73 people and turned much of the country into a battlefield, could backfire if it becomes a protracted quagmire, provokes war with Syria or exposes Israelis to increasingly deadly attacks.
But Olmert likely sees Israel's simultaneous offensives in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon as a way to strike a decisive blow not only against Hezbollah and Hamas but also against the interests of Syria and Iran, which bankroll and arm the militants.
Because of widespread Israeli support for strong action against Hezbollah, which penetrated Israel's northern border and captured two soldiers this week, Olmert could be in even bigger trouble if he backs down.
. . .
Support for Israel's campaign in Lebanon has come from some unlikely sources, including Yossi Beilin, Israel's best known leftist, and Orna Shimoni, who played a leading role in pressing Israel to withdraw from Lebanon in 2000 after an 18-year occupation.
. . .Israeli Cabinet Minister Isaac Herzog said Israel wants to "change the rules of the game."
"Our aim is to change the basic parameters and the basic pattern of behavior so that there will be no more kidnappings and no more insurgencies and no more terror activity and we expect that the Lebanese government will know that they will pay a price if they don't act," he told The Associated Press.
Brig. Gen. Ido Nehushtan, a member of Israel's General Staff, put it bluntly: "We need to put Hezbollah out of business."
Posted by: Ragnar at
05:19 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 435 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Mark at July 14, 2006 05:47 PM (j+tr0)
Posted by: jesusland joe at July 14, 2006 05:47 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at July 14, 2006 06:13 PM (gLMre)
once hzbllh runs out of missiles and rockets - they will flee.
they wll crack like slobodan - only faster because they have less to begin with, and because the idf will utilize ALL assets (unlike clinton who forced wesl clark to use only air assets).
okay: i am on record with this. here, and i blogged it too.
remember: this will NOT effect beirut - and will not involve much urban warfare. but even if it does, it will not be on the same scale as jenin or fallujah.
the gloves are off and the idf will not fight with one hand behind it's back.
this scenario doesn't give assad or iran an excuse for joining the fray.
Posted by: reliapundit at July 14, 2006 06:34 PM (f6f/y)
Why do you insist on quoting the AP (Associated Phables)? They are but a terrorist propaganda machine. As soon as I saw the "AP" byline I quit reading. Quoting them gives them credibility, and quite frankly, they have none.
Posted by: Vulgorilla at July 14, 2006 06:40 PM (nRTGY)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at July 14, 2006 08:03 PM (q5wwn)
Posted by: greyrooster at July 14, 2006 08:36 PM (pkrE/)
Posted by: Some Dude at July 14, 2006 09:05 PM (llVQM)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at July 14, 2006 10:27 PM (v3I+x)
Posted by: Howie at July 15, 2006 06:30 AM (D3+20)
34 queries taking 0.0606 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









