December 09, 2005
You can debate all you want as to whether this hostage or that deserved their fate, we don't think any of them deserve it, unless it can be conclusively proven that it was staged.
But I dare anyone to defend this.
Do it. I dare you to justify the kidnapping of an 8 year old boy.
Go ahead, try it. Those of you who think the CPT people are getting their just due, tell me how this boy is getting his. Those of you who scream Bush lied people died, you tell me how someone who would kidnap an 8 year old boy is a "freedom fighter" or a "minuteman."
Posted by: Vinnie at
08:15 PM
| Comments (38)
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
God forbid anyone be able to tell the difference between two different situations.
Karim -- innocent. Lives there. Has nothing to do with either the terrorists or the government, beyond his father's occupation.
CPT -- guilty of supporting terrorists in Iraq and the PA. Don't live there. Get in the way of the Iraqi government, with the intent of providing aid to the terrorists.
I don't care if the CPT profess to be pacifists; their actions say more than their words.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at December 09, 2005 09:01 PM (Gn9tM)
Posted by: Jester at December 09, 2005 09:08 PM (a6n28)
From a CPT report filed in Iraq on April 26, 2005:
"The insurgency has been targeting physicians. Dr. Al-brhim [not his real name] mentioned at least a dozen who have been killed in the last several months, three in the last six weeks. Not only does he live under constant fear that his clinic will be looted, but he lives also under threats to his life. He has already paid ransom to protect his children from kidnapping." - http://www.cpt.org/archives/2005/apr05/0032.html
Posted by: Rob at December 09, 2005 10:27 PM (Wl7Nx)
By all means, provide the court documents that prove that the 4 CPT hostages are guilty.
The fact that CPT is an unapologetic group of moonbats doesn't make those 4 hostages any less innocent than this little boy.
Posted by: Vinnie at December 09, 2005 10:31 PM (Kr6/f)
Posted by: john Ryan at December 09, 2005 11:37 PM (ads7K)
Posted by: Vinnie at December 10, 2005 12:34 AM (Kr6/f)
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 10, 2005 01:11 AM (6LOUW)
Just wondering.
Posted by: Screw em at December 10, 2005 02:03 AM (R+YwI)
Did you hear the Israeli's steal Palestinian Children's eyes? or that Kennedy was killed by a microwave mind control ray that took control of Oswald? how about the earthquake generator in the nose of the space shuttle? Project Blue Beam? Project Seafarer? Project SnowBird? or Project AQUARIUS, GOD HELP US!!! the United States Evil GubberMint is going to kill us all!!!
You DailyKos boys, go back to your tinfoil hat talk, leave the adults to the real conversation, thanks.
Posted by: dave at December 10, 2005 05:25 AM (CcXvt)
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 10, 2005 06:26 AM (6LOUW)
Posted by: dave at December 10, 2005 07:54 AM (CcXvt)
Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at December 10, 2005 08:53 AM (tdhAh)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 10, 2005 09:18 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Graeme at December 10, 2005 09:45 AM (wnWIl)
Napalm is only actually effective in open area engagements and its not a precision dropped munition. Its not very effective (and pretty much useless) in built up areas - particlarly on ones that rely heavily on stone, mortar and concrete construction - add to that design layout - narrow streets, courtyards and alleyways between multiple story structures with building materials see above.
I know during the overall conflict situations may have arose where is was an effective option (we actually pick and chose the tools for the job on the spot - (hugh diverse inventory!), but seems to me they would have been few.
I watched portions of that RAI doc - was it just me - or the only actual film footage of napalm being deployed was old vietnam war material? (BTW - liked the sound track).
Its not like its not noticable when being used (like WP no less!). What exactly is the problem with documenting the claims? Batteries dead that day on the Camcorder(s)? After-injuries don't cut it - I've seen injuries - got tons of TMs on them and treatment - you can't simply pass off any type of warzone injury as napalm - its dumb!
No pictures - fine - how about materials. Napalm has a very distinct burn signature on materials (organic and non) plus an extremely distinct chemical signature and residue that can be readily analysed. Its actually easy for God's sake!
I just don't know! I try to be fair and give many on the left the benefit of a doubt regarding their actual intelligence. Some here actually criticise me for that approach - but I have to wonder sometimes - maybe they really are morons.
Graeme - I believe you are a Brit - and you may have travelled a bit. Maybe you can explain to some of these idiots that building materials vary greatly around the world - and in that part of the world concrete block, brick n' mortar are #1. They hold up extremely well against napalm (good protection). HE with good concussion and precision-guided munitions with reactive shaped HE warheads however ... that's another story.
Posted by: hondo at December 10, 2005 11:03 AM (3aakz)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 10, 2005 11:03 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Graeme at December 10, 2005 12:54 PM (wnWIl)
Posted by: hondo at December 10, 2005 03:57 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: Graeme at December 10, 2005 04:51 PM (wnWIl)
You didn't answer my question.
Did anymore mercenary security consultants get their just due today?
And if being in favor of truth, the constitution, and being opposed to destroying our military and economy through asinine warmongering such as neanderthal chickenshits like you and your ilk means "being a kid". Heh, you can have your fantasy that you're an adult.
Posted by: Screw em at December 10, 2005 04:58 PM (UfKum)
Tell us, does talking tough on the internet make you feel like a man? opposed to when you normally "feel a man" (in a truckstop bathroom for $10)
Posted by: dave at December 10, 2005 05:06 PM (CcXvt)
Posted by: hondo at December 10, 2005 05:08 PM (3aakz)
What you think is irrelevent. You are needed to help bring a known terrorist to justice.
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 10, 2005 07:08 PM (RfI6W)
These liberal scum all deserve to be sent to Iraq. Perhaps then the pukes might see the light. Nah, they are too hypocritical for that.
Posted by: jesusland joe at December 10, 2005 08:02 PM (rUyw4)
Little screw em is more likely to get with a group of his fellow girlie boys, buy a Playboy or Penthouse, and proceed with a circle jerk. That's about his speed.
Posted by: jesusland joe at December 10, 2005 08:23 PM (rUyw4)
Substantiated facts. Not verbal vomit.
Posted by: dick muesser at December 10, 2005 10:08 PM (dMHCB)
Er, I have absolutely no clue!
Could be one of those creative writing software programs off on its own - early generation no less.
Posted by: hondo at December 10, 2005 10:31 PM (3aakz)
But verbal vomit is all we've had from these liberal Kos trolls who come in here for no other reason than to insult and obstruct. Do you think they deserve any respect from us? I don't bother arguing with a fool who has drunk the kool-aid of the radical Left while wearing a tin foil hat. It's useless and counterproductive.
Posted by: jesusland joe at December 10, 2005 11:27 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: hondo at December 10, 2005 11:40 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: Rob at December 11, 2005 12:00 AM (Wl7Nx)
It's such a simple question.
Why are you so scared to answer it?
Hell you're more scared to answer the question than you are to enlist. Chickenhawk is too nice a term for you. You can't even fight from your keyboard.
Poor little sad skurred-of-brownies bitch.
Do you shake in your boots whenever you see an Arab in close proximity? Do you get on your cell and call mommy and tell her to come get you back to the basement pronto?
Bitchass pussy.
Screw em!
Posted by: Screw Em at December 11, 2005 04:49 AM (hRM9L)
Your sentiments are worthy of recognition but they are nothing this blog has sought to display either in the front page posts or in 90% of the commenters opinions.
This blog and the grand majority of its commenters are the ultimate in hypocrisy. You obviously see that just as I do.
SCREW EM.
Posted by: Screw Em at December 11, 2005 04:51 AM (hRM9L)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 11, 2005 09:21 AM (0yYS2)
See, idiot you can come here and talk all the bitch smack like the hippy you are, you pussies lay away at night thinking the U.S government is plotting to kill you, because you "know to much" and you know the "truth".
People that think the Government is going to get them suffer from their feelings of being insignificant, being the target of something bigger makes them feel better about themselves. No need to keep your dirty laundry in a safe big boy, the Government doesn't want to steal your DNA, or your deficient brain waves.
Talk it up and feel the big man, we all know how you cower under your urine soaked bedsheets at the thought of the Government, people like you are more an object of pity than anger.
Posted by: dave at December 11, 2005 11:27 AM (CcXvt)
I tried to get greg to meet me, and I'd love to meet you, nice and private, because I'd like to see how long you could live without any skin. The day you meet me is the day you die bitch.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 11, 2005 07:13 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: dave at December 11, 2005 07:49 PM (CcXvt)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 12, 2005 09:35 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: dave at December 12, 2005 04:11 PM (CcXvt)
34 queries taking 0.0608 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.