February 01, 2006
US troops in Iraq are reacting to a phenomenon I first mentioned here, as displayed by CNN's Christiane Amanpour in her unprofessional and shameful appearance on Larry King Live Monday:
So when something happens to people that we identify, like Bob and like Doug, we wake up again and realize, no, this is not acceptable, what's going on there.It's not surprising that Amanpour can't identify with "ordinary" people. Journalism is not, by any stretch of the imagination, rocket science, and the standards of television place many dense and self-absorbed newsreaders, like Amanpour, in front of the public as "authorities". This idea that journalists, who follow undemanding courses of study to attain their positions (I studied journalism in college - absolute cake courses) are somehow an elite group of intellectuals is at the root of all problems with news reporting today.
Not being dense and self-absorbed; in fact, being pretty much the opposite, American servicepeople were quick to pick up on this. A few quotes from the troops via United Press International:
"Why do you think this is such a huge story?" wrote an officer stationed in Baqubah, Iraq, Monday via e-mail. "It's a bit stunning to us over here how absolutely dominant the story is on every network and front page. I mean, you'd think we lost the entire 1st Marine Division or something.Via The Drudge Report."There's a lot of grumbling from guys at all ranks about it. That's a really impolite and impolitic thing to say ... but it's what you would hear over here."
"The point that is currently being made (is that) that press folks are more important than mere military folks," a senior military officer told UPI Tuesday.
"It's just a bit frustrating to see something so dramatized that happens every day to some 20-year-old American -- or worse to 10, 30-year-old Iraqi soldiers or cops alongside us. Some of the stories don't even mention the Iraqi casualties in this attack, as if they're meaningless," wrote the officer in Baqubah.
Update: Others covering this story:
Prairie Pundit also notes the disproportionate coverage given Woodruff.
Austin Bay Blog zeroes in on a line from the UPI story: "...very few reporters have served."
Code Red: Women For The Troops - also at The Filthy One
The News & Observer's Public Editor says Woodruff's celebrity is responsible.
Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
08:25 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 418 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Insomniac at February 01, 2006 08:32 AM (IEpte)
Posted by: Insomniac at February 01, 2006 08:32 AM (IEpte)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 01, 2006 09:03 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 01, 2006 09:22 AM (0yYS2)
The point I'm trying to make is that the newspaper and media business is pretty easy stuff. These people who major in journalism and media studies are hardly what one would call the intelligent students, and are normally too slow for math and science. Most of them I met were yearbook editors and such in high school and were looking for something easy after they lost their interest in elementary education.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 01, 2006 10:13 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 01, 2006 10:21 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Graeme at February 01, 2006 11:01 AM (WtwuU)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 01, 2006 11:33 AM (0yYS2)
i just reposted with her info.
NEWSANCHOR INJURED IN IRAQ!!! TIME TO REDEPLOY ALL REPORTERS!!! UPDATED AND BUMPED UP: THE TROOPS AGREE WITH ME!
TELEVISION ANCHORMAN INJURED IN IRAQ!!! IRAQ IS STILL DANGEROUS FDOR REPORTERS!!! WHAT MUST WE DO?
"Staying the course in Iraq is not an option or a policy for the MSM. I believe we must begin discussions for an immediate re-deployment of all MSM reporters from Iraq. Some claim the answer is to put even more reporters on the ground, but many of our reporters are already on their third deployment, our MSM cannot recruit to its current target, even as they lower recruiting standards.
My plan calls for a more rapid turnover of reporting in Iraq to the Iraqi reporters. MSM reporting in in Iraq is a major driving force behind the insurgency. The MSM has become a catalyst for violence. That's why we must redeploy reporters immediately!"
(SATIRE OFF.) First, I want to extend my condolences to the Woodruff anf Vogt families. I am praying for their swift and complete recovery.
Now.... here's the truth:
EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT ACCIDENTALLY ONE OF THE VICTIMS IN THIS ATTACK WAS A CELEBRITY, THERE IS NO NEWS-WORTHINESS IN THIS STORY.
The enemy hasn't surrendered and they continue to target soft targets: mosques; funerals; weddings; children getting candy; Iraqi police; Iraqi Army and and reporters riding in Iraq Army vehicles.
My sarcastic little pitch was only meant to further expose Murtha and his Leftie comrades, fellow appeasers, dupes, and doves who MISCONTRUE THE DATA (IOW: LIE) and advocate cutting and running. Cutting and running is a stupid policy and a worse strategy. Why does the Left advocate the wrong policy, a policy of premature withdrawal and appeasement!? THEY ALWAYS HAVE. They ran out on the South Vietnamese, they abandoned the CONTRAS, and they would do the same to the Iraqis - and the Israelis.
The best strategy is to destroy the enemy. That's how you win wars. The best strategy is to intercept all the sigint - NO MATTTER WHERE IT EMANATES FROM AND NO MATTER WHERE IT GOES.
The Leftie doves - and the Old Media and Democrat Party they control - would rather we purchased temporary truce at the price of eternal chains and everlasting shame. For that is all you ever really get when you give into blackmail and terror. The Left's denial of this fact is no different than their denial of the fact that socialism was not only a abject failure at providing the goods, but the single biggest cause of genocide in all of human history. We should no more listen to the Left now, then jump off a bridge. The Bolsheviks were wrong in 1917 and they are wrong now.
2/1/06 - UPDATE: THE TROOPS AGREE WITH ME! UPI/PAMELA HESS:
The American media stood up and took notice when an improvised explosive device grievously injured an ABC News crew Sunday. In Iraq, and throughout the military, there is sympathy and concern for anchor Bob Woodruff and cameraman Doug Vogt, but there is also this question:
"Why do you think this is such a huge story?" wrote an officer stationed in Baqubah, Iraq, Monday via e-mail. "It's a bit stunning to us over here how absolutely dominant the story is on every network and front page. I mean, you'd think we lost the entire 1st Marine Division or something. "There's a lot of grumbling from guys at all ranks about it. That's a really impolite and impolitic thing to say ... but it's what you would hear over here." ... "The point that is currently being made (is that) that press folks are more important than mere military folks," a senior military officer told UPI Tuesday.
The troops are EXACTLY RIGHT: the Old Media care more about themselves than our troops our our cause. That's one big reason the Old Media is scum. And their ratings reflect the fact that patriotic Americans realize this!
Posted by: reliapundit at February 01, 2006 11:51 AM (75WzH)
I'm old enough to remember when reporters stayed off camera while adding narration/commentary - and emerged only at the opening and closing. Those days are gone!
When your the star - your THE STAR.
JJ! A rockhound? Same here - among other related fields. Noticed that too about college "journalism". It has become the new "Phs ED Degree" for faux-intellectuals. Noted the total lack of secondary substance fields - shows in their work when they cover areas they have absolutely no knowledge and understanding of.
Posted by: hondo at February 01, 2006 12:15 PM (3aakz)
Then I discovered fossils. So I traveled from one dig to another seeking everything from sharks's teeth to dinosaurs. But couldn't make a living at it.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 01, 2006 10:23 PM (rUyw4)
34 queries taking 0.3038 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.