January 06, 2007

Jamil Hussein Denies Being Source for Burning 6 Story (Bumped)

UPDATE (Good Lt.): (Bumped, because the AP doesn't wish it to be seen or known.) Commentor Shad puts it quite succinctly at protein wisdom:

"I guess I still don’t understand why the lefties are all doing a celebration dance.

The AP reported a story with two named sources saying that 6 people had been dragged into the street and burned alive, 4 mosques had been utterly destroyed, and 18 more people were killed in the obliterated mosques.

After investigating this amazing story, it turned out that:

* One of the sources immediately recanted his version of the story.

* No one was burned in the streets.

* No mosques were destroyed.

* No one was killed in the mosques that weren’t destroyed.

* A month or so later the AP has finally found an Iraqi named Jamil Hussein, but he denies being the AP’s source.

In sum, the AP published an utterly false enemy propaganda story, which has been recanted/denied by both of their named sources and demonstrated as inaccurate by people in Iraq who investigated the sites allegedly involved in the carnage. Yet according to the latest round of Townhouse groupthink, all of this is somehow damaging to the people who were critical of the AP’s original fantasy and exposed it as a pack of lies.

Very odd."

Hey - Kathy Carroll says you should just shut the f*ck up. Why question any of that? More fun at Dan Riehl. The AP thinks its done here, and that' s good. Now that we've established that Hussein is a real person, it will allow these initial inquiries into his stories to keep percolating, uninterrupted.
- - -
Curt at Flopping Aces this and more from a source in the Civilian Police Assistance Training Team:
The real issue is this: Jamil works in Al Khadra (think of Staten Island) -- he's telling the media about Al Hurriah murders (Think of Queens -- it's a different area of the city):

* Why would any reporter consider this guy a reliable source under these circumstances?

* There are no bodies.
* The source is a police officer from a different area of the city
* There's no official police report to refer to -- so where did the information come from?
* The bodies were reportedly taken to a hospital morgue that doesn't have a morgue
* There are no family member reports, complaints or interviews
* There are no pictures or video of the event.
* None of the other media in Baghdad are covering this

....MOI officials have now questioned Captain Jamil Ghlaim at MOI headquarters. Ghlaim continues to deny speaking to AP or any other media outlet.

Plot meet thickener.

Oh, and just in case you came looking for the original, uncut, uncensored version of the Saddam Hussein execution video.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:58 PM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 476 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Maybe they did make up his name and this guy was unlucky enough to have the same one.

Posted by: Fred Fry at January 06, 2007 04:35 PM (hLi8T)

2 OR maybe they pulled the Iraqi version of Identity theft? That makes more sense to me because its a kind of misdirection I saw some kids try in high school. A teacher went to write their names down for detention, and they tried to give the wrong names. I don't remember if it worked. But it IS a cheap ploy, and it has sown confusion if that is what they actually did.                            
 
 
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at January 06, 2007 05:32 PM (2OHpj)

3 That wasn't the issue. The issue was what he was telling the AP, which still doesn't make a sh*t's worth of consistent sense. Read our previous posts  and Bob Owens.

Its just getting interesting, moonbat. Stay tuned, as much as you hate to.

:-*

Posted by: Good Lt at January 06, 2007 09:18 PM (D0TMh)

4 Your beloved source says that AP is full of shit. The claims of the AP stories have been proven to be full of shit. If he is not willing to be the source of the stories then AP needs to admit that there is no such source. Just because someone exists with the real name and rank does not make the "source" less of a work of fiction. You loose.

Unless we all adopt leftists' standards. Then maybe I can claim that John Kerry wrote The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Hey, it is a real work and Kerry is a real person (sort of) so it is true right? So what if he denies it, he is just suddenly intimidated. He admitted it earlier I swear! Kerry is an anti -Semitic liar.

Posted by: Chuck at January 06, 2007 10:13 PM (09chD)

5 Ha, ha ha! That repulsive dumptruck, Kathleen Carroll is going to eat a huge shit sandwich over this one. The AP and the rest of the Establishment media may have deep pockets, but the crudity of the burning shite lie renders it indefensible. The entire story is based on the amateurish propaganda of a primitive Iraqitard, and the pro-terrorist AP didn't think anybody would fact check their fanciful little tale. And why not? It's been getting away with murder for decades.


Not this time. Blogs are the last line of defense the public has against the Establishment Media war on objective truth and American values.


The only shite that's going to burn over this is Carroll and Co. After they swallow their dookie sandwich in public, or course. Do you fries with that, bitch?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 06, 2007 10:25 PM (abVz3)

6 Oops! A correction just for you mz Carroll. I know how much your organization values accuracy. (Guffaw!!!!)


The only shite that's going to burn over this is Carroll and her crew. After they swallow their dookie sandwich in public, of course. Do you want fries with that, bitch?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 06, 2007 10:30 PM (abVz3)

7 Hey, I'm guessing you mistook me for someone else. You couldn't have been talking to me ...
 
"Its just getting interesting, moonbat"
 
 
I was just saying AP, or someone could have used his name, and hoped nobody would take it this far in fact checking them. thats not to say the AP shouldn't go down in big greasy flames like the bloated lying pig of an institution that they have become.
 
 
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at January 06, 2007 11:01 PM (2OHpj)

8 Using the name of a real person to further a scam is one of the oldest tricks in the book, just ask any 419 scammer, and it's beginning to look like that might be the case.  The AP trotting out the real Jamil while ignoring that the facts of their story are all wrong would tend to prove their complicity in the story.  No burned mosques, no bodies, no other witnesses and now the real Jamil says he wasn't the source, yet AP stands by their story!  At this point AP has about as much journalistic integrity as Bagdhad Bob.

Posted by: Buzzy at January 06, 2007 11:14 PM (CXz7T)

9 "The AP trotting out the real Jamil while ignoring that the facts of
their story are all wrong would tend to prove their complicity in the
story."

Don't tell them that. Thery're obviously hoping that this will go away.

When they've refused and failed to address the basic questions about their own ink...

Posted by: Good Lt at January 06, 2007 11:34 PM (D0TMh)

10 I get the feeling that Chuck doesn't like us...

Posted by: Good Lt at January 07, 2007 01:52 AM (D0TMh)

11 Hey i know -- let's just make up a bunch of scenarios and declare them all either very likely or just plain right because hey - we're not accountable, and aren't trying to do reporting in a war zone, so we have all the answers. That's the ticket. Plus, we don't have to get it right. we just have to wait for someone else's mistake and play that up. no flies on us.

.. and here's some "clairvoyance" from this very blog site:

"the mythical Jamil Hussein" -- ooops.

"I don't know if Jamil Hussein exists--but neither does AP." -- oops.

We're rightists. Not wrongists. Nothing disturbs our world view. Now let's grab some more food from our moms' refrigerators and blog some more!

-- "All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting." -- Orwell. (But then all he did was take a bullet in the neck writing about the Spanish Civil War. Sap.)

Posted by: E.A. Blair at January 07, 2007 02:54 AM (2E3ge)

12 "I never quite understood why people chose to
disbelieve us about this particular man on this particular story,"
Carroll told E&P, referring to Jamil Hussein, an Iraq police
captain.



Such fake dismay that we are no longer ignoring the man behind the
curtain is laughable at best, but pathalogical liars tend to just dig
harder and faster when they find themselves in a hole. A good lefturd
is a dead one.



Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 07, 2007 10:46 AM (v3I+x)

13 (snorkle) "This particular", eh?

Posted by: Phillep at January 07, 2007 01:16 PM (dK7pL)

14 B. A. Blair:


The entire Jamilgate hoax was made possible by the fact that AP reporters DON'T report from a "war" zone, you hopeless idiot. If they did, they wouldn't have to rely on faceless stringers with terrorist axes to grind.


I'm guessing that you aren't fighting in Iraq, which makes Orwell's quote an accurate description of you.


Ignoring facts seems to come very easily to you. Do you work for the AP?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 07, 2007 02:12 PM (abVz3)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
39kb generated in CPU 0.0161, elapsed 0.0406 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.03 seconds, 169 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.