December 03, 2005

The Islamic Army in Iraq has released a video of an IED attack against Marines in Fallujah. The attack killed 10 Marines. Images from the video are posted below. They are not graphic, but may be disturbing.
Al Qaeda in Iraq has also released a video of its Ramadi offensive. Images posteed below and right. For links to video, please e-mail author.
The video shows a Marine patrol and a Hummer rolling down an alley or a narrow road, on which civilians are present. The Hummer passes the Marines as it approaches the terrorist's position. The IED explosion is large and does damage to the Humvee, but the driver inside appears to be able to continue to drive the vehicle. Civilians can be seen panicking and fleeing. The video then becomes shaky as the terrorist flees the scene.
The video reveals why the IED attack was so devestating. Presumably, like most incidents of this nature, the IED was planted with the expectation that it would be exploded as a vehicle or convey passed. The terrorists, it would seem, just got 'lucky' in that on this particular day a foot patrol decided to walk down the wrong alley.
Despite media reports of 'mounting casualties', attacks are down in Iraq. The IED attack reveals that the so-called insurgents cannot mount even an effective attack against U.S. positions.
Yesterday, propagandists for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's al Qaeda in Iraq posted a message claiming they had taken 'control of Ramadi'. This despite the fact that the terrorists were only able to fire a single mortar shell at a U.S. position and less than 300 U.S. troops and 200 Iraqis were used in the counteroffensive. The counteroffensive turned out to be nothing more than the troops entering Ramadi unnoposed and turned into a routine search and sweep operation.
The only evidence that al Qaeda offered that they 'controlled' Ramadi was a short video by their IMC media arm showing a group of masked young men in cheap warm-up pants and tee shirts slowly going down a narrow alley. There are no more than seven or eight terrorists in the group. That's right, 7-8 terrorists with AK-47's and a single RPG! An image from that video is posted above and a few more are posted below.
Oddly enough, the IMC (Islamic Media Center) cameraman hides from the terrorists while he takes the video. The IMC has recently pledge its loyalty to Osama bin Laden and urged others to do the same. It appears that even the jihadi supporters are afraid of the brave and noble mujahidin!
So, if the 'insurgency' cannot hold any territory, is not very popular in the eyes of even Sunnis these days, and must resort to remotely detonated bombs and hostage taking, in what lies their hope of victory?
The media and spineless politicians in Washington D.C.
The spinmeisters at al Jazeera, Jihad Unspun, and Uruknet report the communique as fact and then, trying to turn this into some grand irony, announce that the Ramadi 'victory' comes only days after Bush announced his strategy for victory. As if a single IED and a handful of sweat-pants clad 'insurgents' are a threat to U.S. victory in Iraq!
It would all be very laughable if the U.S. media wasn't so busy hand-wringing and having LSD induced flashbacks of Vietnam. The media spin then leads the American public to think that this insurgency poses an actual threat and that somehow we cannot win in Iraq. All of this is not helped by the extreme Left wing of the Democratic party which is all to eager to see America lose in Iraq.
Folks, the only threat to our long-term victory in Iraq comes not form the terrorists, but from spineless politicians in the U.S.
Click images below for larger view.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:40 PM
| Comments (43)
| Add Comment
Post contains 663 words, total size 6 kb.
But come on, Rusty, you give these guys a hard time. Have you ever worn Addidas warm-up pants? Those things are so comfortable! How could one ever go pack to a crap-soaked one-piece after those pants? I think it is simply more evidence of the CIA corrupting the noble Holy Warriors.
Posted by: Wine-aholic at December 03, 2005 04:11 PM (sH4J5)
Oct was the 4th deadliest month. I haven't yet found a site with monthly attack numbers.
The analysis of the pant leg and bicycle is wrong on the image. That's the left pant leg that's rolled up. A bicycle chain is on the right side.
Posted by: actus at December 03, 2005 04:15 PM (dFCoa)
Posted by: dave at December 03, 2005 04:29 PM (CcXvt)
As a larger question, are we mixing terms here? Are we taking "number of deaths" or "number of attacks" as the metric? The two are certainly different.
Posted by: Wine-aholic at December 03, 2005 04:43 PM (sH4J5)
As a larger question, are we mixing terms here? Are we taking "number of deaths" or "number of attacks" as the metric? The two are certainly different."
I know about icasualties.org. Its a site about # of attacks that I don't know of, not # of dead.
Posted by: actus at December 03, 2005 04:50 PM (dFCoa)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 03, 2005 06:04 PM (8e/V4)
Agent Brown realized that bicycles were used by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka for transporting explosives and suicide bombers.
Agent Smith knows that the Seattle Police Department also uses bicycles to stealthily approach and subdue suspects.
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 03, 2005 06:08 PM (VDGim)
maybe its like an islamic hip hop gang thing - kinda like their colors. They don't seem to have any basebal caps to wear sideways so I guess their are making due with cheap hotel towels.
How would rap actually sound in arabic? Anybody wanna give it a shot?
Posted by: hondo at December 03, 2005 06:16 PM (3aakz)
like Mohammed did Jihad,
I rock the Baghdad,
the soldiers, they don't see me,
rollin' in my VBIED,
under tha' seat, the RDX blew,
my virgins bitches, they number seventy-two,
Alah Ackbarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
short notice, what can I say ;/
Posted by: dave at December 03, 2005 06:31 PM (CcXvt)
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 03, 2005 07:30 PM (VDGim)
The average insurgency lasts nine years, I would say we're well ahead of schedule, would you not?
Posted by: dave at December 03, 2005 07:44 PM (CcXvt)
Agent Smith
Mort Sahl was a satirist and an ultra-liberal and was quite funny and good at it.
Al Franken is a satirist and an ultra-liberal and not funny at all - he's actually quite bad at it.
You wish to be a satirist (as opposed to a comedian - there is a difference) - and follow in the footsteps of lil' Al.
Well - those are tiny shoes to fill, and you are doing an adequate job of it.
Posted by: hondo at December 03, 2005 08:08 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 03, 2005 08:21 PM (VDGim)
On the other hand, don't forget that the principle means of transport of NVA and VC was the bicycle, used to shift many thousands of tonnes of supplies along the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
Historically, all "insurgencies" tend to die after an average of six years of determined suppression. E.g, the Boer rebellion, Malaya and Aden. Viet Nam was an exception, yet it remains perversely touted as some kind of paradigm. The question remains one of having the determination to persist.
Posted by: booyakka at December 03, 2005 08:37 PM (n66qx)
What amazed me was this MSM reporter took the insurgent's videos and images completely at face-value while commenting on the "spin" the U.S. military uses to issue reports.
When are these media people going to wake up and realize that they're being completely and utterly manipulated by a terrorist insurgency?
Posted by: J at December 03, 2005 09:32 PM (/P1rH)
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 03, 2005 09:37 PM (VDGim)
The Left's only determination is to see the mission fail. They believe failure in Iraq is the only way to regain their political power. Loyalty to party supercedes loyalty to country. They are traitors.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 03, 2005 10:34 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 03, 2005 10:49 PM (VDGim)
Posted by: dave at December 04, 2005 12:09 AM (CcXvt)
Posted by: greyrooster at December 04, 2005 07:05 AM (gvOyZ)
Posted by: freedom at December 04, 2005 05:53 PM (cQE8Q)
Posted by: Jester at December 04, 2005 06:12 PM (wBDaS)
Posted by: hondo at December 04, 2005 06:22 PM (3aakz)
My ethnicity is Samoan but I would love to meet you so you can walk the talk big man.Jester your obviously a white gutless how did you put it DOG!!
Posted by: freedom at December 04, 2005 06:41 PM (cQE8Q)
Posted by: Jester at December 04, 2005 07:42 PM (wBDaS)
Is their a link between 9/11 and Iraq?hell no
Are the Iraqi people better off now then they were under Sadam's Regime?bloody hell no the only difference now is, we the almighty West the saviours are murdering them, and you know why mate BECAUSE THEY ALL LOOK THE SAME!! our coalition forces cannot or will not tell the difference between friend or foe so with our own safety in mind kill anything that moves. The Iraqi's have gone from a stable dictatorship under Sadam to this godforsaken Bloodbath.
So what was this War all about? Control of their resources?Hell yeah If anybody thought that the deaths of hundreds of thousands on whoever's side just to get rid of Sadam, the reason, grow up.If even a quarter of the trillions spent instead of trying to come up with new ways of snuffing out human beings was spent on researching for alternative energy sources.Then the USA truly would be the beacon of democracy, instead of the overfed bully.Then we wouln't be online like bloody kids, throwing insults an our two cents.
Posted by: freedom at December 04, 2005 09:05 PM (cQE8Q)
Posted by: jihadibane at December 04, 2005 09:29 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: freedom at December 04, 2005 10:15 PM (O2l+4)
Actually it was a pretty intense bloodbath prior - simply kept off camera - dictatorships are kinda funny like that.
Now you get to see all the blood courtesy freedom of the press from the media - a democracy is kinda funny like that.
Can't miss the carnage - what with all those car bombings, suicide bombers, beheadings and such. The target of course is the Iraqi people themselves - men, women and children - the oddest thing is that the ones doing this are loyal supporters of Saddam and islamic fundamentalists. Unless of course you believe its American GIs driving the car bombs and strapping explosives to themselves.
Whatever - so when a suicide car bomber kills dozens or a hundred Iraqi civilians do you applaud?
I got to stop - I recognize simple-minded anti-Americanism - not worth pursuing - doubt you could find Iraq on the map or give a damn about them one way or the other.
So, how's the weather down there - coconut crop going to be good this year?
Posted by: hondo at December 04, 2005 10:34 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: freedom at December 04, 2005 11:23 PM (O2l+4)
Must be tough being a stranger in a no so strange land. If anti-Americanism makes you feel better about your place in the world (or lack of) then go for it.
Posted by: hondo at December 04, 2005 11:37 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: freedom at December 05, 2005 12:03 AM (O2l+4)
Agent Brown disagrees and says it is a parallellogram full of lies and distortions.
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 05, 2005 05:39 AM (qLtuI)
Posted by: Oyster at December 05, 2005 06:08 AM (YudAC)
I would suggest you stop believing Baathist propaganda. Like most oil-rich countries, Iraq has always been a shithole incapable of spreading wealth.
Posted by: Macktastick Rusty Wicked at December 05, 2005 08:56 AM (JQjhA)
Go to school, learn some English, read some history, and come back here in a few years and maybe I will know what the hell you are talking about, because dude, you aren't making a bit of sense to me. Might be your broken English, and I don't have a clue where I can learn Samoan.(Is that your language?)
Posted by: jihadibane at December 05, 2005 09:02 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Jester at December 05, 2005 01:15 PM (wBDaS)
Posted by: greyrooster at December 05, 2005 06:16 PM (9Dlss)
i honestly wipe my arse on the koran every morning. a couple of pages get your shitty ring just as clean as toilet paper.
boycott the arab owned shops and businesses.
Posted by: london defense force at December 06, 2005 02:59 PM (B4Ge0)
Posted by: Jester at December 06, 2005 03:27 PM (wBDaS)
Posted by: greyrooster at December 07, 2005 04:45 AM (OvTKg)
A) Saddamn Hussain, and Osama Bin Laden were both used extensivly and to great effect by US intellegence services who should have scrubbed their running dogs when they decommissioned them. Bush Sr should have ordered the shot back in 91, and established a resonably secure, permanent base at the time. Instead, now TWO generations of Bush's have done nothing but create a situation where the US will be forced to return to and implement so called "band aid" solutions.
B) Too much attention is being given to the pathetic, splintered Iraqui insurgency when clearly the forces funding, equipping, and motivating these factions lie beyond it's borders. Notably Syria, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.
C) If the west would wean itself off of damned foreign fossil fuels, we could isolate this little crap-hole in Hell and let them busily kill each other until they grew out of political and religious despotism.
Posted by: Entropolis at December 20, 2005 03:45 AM (sS7+z)
Posted by: billy the web designer at March 19, 2006 06:19 PM (jjv4x)
34 queries taking 0.0258 seconds, 198 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.