February 15, 2006

Children Murdered Walking to School

(Baghdad) Highlights in today's religion of peace news include:

From USAToday.com:

A bomb exploded Wednesday on a central Baghdad street, killing three girls and a boy walking to school, police and relatives said. The dead included two sisters and their brother.

[ ... ]

Police said the children were between the ages of 10 and 14 and included two sons and a daughter of Jamil Mohammed, a poor vendor who works in a nearby public market.

"We are poor people who has nothing to do with politics," the father sobbed at the local police station. "We only wanted to live a decent life. What is the guilt of my dead children? They were only heading to school. Now I am left with only two children. This is a disaster for my family."

First of all, does anyone at USAToday proofread? The first paragraph says "two sisters and their brother" were murdered. A couple paragraphs down, it says "two sons and a daughter" were murdered. Hello, USAToday, anybody home? In a WaPo story, three boys are reported to have been murdered.

If one reads several reports, a conclusion can be drawn that four children were murdered, three boys and a girl. Why can't the mainstream media get the numbers right? You tell me. I do know that the MSM are fairly much in unison at providing justification for the killings. Without exception, it's reported that a store which sold black-market liquor was bombed, among other stores, by the way. So, the MSM can't get the number of kids murdered right, but they sure can reach into the minds of the thug criminals and extract a motive to justify the bombing. You see a slant? I do.

Moving on, it has to be assumed that there's no room on the moderate Muslim protest schedule to express outrage at the murder of innocent children. On the other hand, it might be that murdering children doesn't meet the threshold criteria for outrage. Planned protests, I believe, are reserved for more significant criminal acts than the murder of children. Like cartoons.

From Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 10:00 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 348 words, total size 2 kb.

1 More journalist have been killed covering Iraq then in Vietnam. The security situation there is not getting any better. It is often impossible or simply too dangerous to move around the country. There is really no place in the country except Kurdistan that is safe.

Posted by: john ryan at February 15, 2006 10:21 AM (TcoRJ)

2 John, you need to broaden your horizons and read more than the NYT.

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 15, 2006 03:47 PM (rUyw4)

3 How many journalists have been killed pontificating from their ivory towers at the Greenzone?

Are you somehow amazed that a guerilla insurgency that targets Iraqi citizens and foreigners for kidnap and execution, that has roadside bombs detonated to kill *anyone* not just military targets is a dangerous place?

The journalists would probably be better off if they didn't hire stringers hired from the midst of the terrorists.


Posted by: dave at February 15, 2006 04:18 PM (CcXvt)

4 Yes, children murdered by terrorists are fine and all, but DICK CHENEY SHOT A LAWYER!!!

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 15, 2006 05:57 PM (0yYS2)

5 These are the child killers they murder kids with abomb they are facless cowards

Posted by: sandpiper at February 15, 2006 08:59 PM (9NBAS)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
31kb generated in CPU 0.014, elapsed 0.1014 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0937 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.