June 16, 2007
Amil Imani Via American Thinker: In the interest of impartiality, the authors of the Constitution did not define what constitutes a religion. Presently, a plethora of sects, cults, orders-all claiming to be religion-cover the length and the breadth of the land. So long as these "religions" minister to the legitimate spiritual needs of their congregation without threatening the rights of others, there is no reason for concern. However, when one or more of these claimants strive to undermine the very Constitution that protects them in order to impose their belief and way of life, serious problems arise.Can a religion or a cult become so powerful and so uncivilized that it can hide behind the Constitution to preach an ideology of hatred and advocate a plan to destroy our society and subvert our government? We need to consider whether our Constitution enables and protects "religions" that are being used to put our very society and our freedoms in jeopardy.
When people from Islamic nations tell you that Islam can be dangerous to America maybe you should listen. As if the daily death toll isn't enough?
Clearly a large portion of those causing mayhem and suffering in the Middle East and elsewhere believe they are doing what is demanded of them by Islam.
Someone needs to tell them what they are doing, all the suffering they bring upon Muslims an others, is wrong. And if you can't prove it to them using Islam itself what hope is there?
The only choice left is to fight them. To settle the issue of Islams place on the battlefield. For everyone's sake, I pray those who still bring suffering and murder in the name of God are defeated.
Posted by: Howie at
03:49 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 326 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 16, 2007 09:37 PM (AsTKg)
I'm trying to think of an easier regime to topple, but nothing comes to mind. I can't believe it hasn't happened already, in fact.
Posted by: Hucbald at June 16, 2007 09:52 PM (0Zliy)
This Amil Imani guy strikes me a genuine fellow. Although I differ with him on a few subjects, when it comes to Islam, I agree with him 100%.
What people in the west need to learn is that Islam is in fact the farthest thing from a religion. Islam is a racialist political ideology which relies on the following three tools to achieve military dominance and to perpetuate its worthless existence:
1) Bloodshed (which you see on TV everyday)
2) Deceit (case in point CAIR, NIAC)
3) Using of women as incubation machines to effect a high birth rate (just look at Europe).
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 16, 2007 10:23 PM (EdIIN)
which has become a multilingual sensation on the web.
Ali Sina also has written a book on the evil that is Islam called "Understanding Mohammed: A Psychobiography of Allâh’s Prophet"
http://www.lulu.com/content/787599
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 16, 2007 10:30 PM (EdIIN)
What is needed in all democracies is the specification that all shall have freedom of worship, so long as their religious practices do not in any way violate any other provisions of the constitution. This should incude all human rights provisions. This, of course, is common sense, but it has to be in writ of law to be enforceable.
As it is, devout cannibals to could take up residence in any democracy and claim that eating their fellow citizens is a part of their religion, and therfore an inalienable right.
Posted by: DemocracyRules at June 17, 2007 12:32 AM (PnMRH)
That's the whole point Islam is NOT a form of worship any more than Stalinism or Hitlerism are forms of worship.
Islam use "religion" to camouflage its true nature.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 17, 2007 10:59 AM (j97MF)
Here's a grammatically correct version of my comment above:
That's the whole point! Islam is NOT a form of worship any more than Stalinism or Hitlerism are forms of worship.
Islam uses the word "religion" to camouflage its true nature.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 17, 2007 11:50 AM (j97MF)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 17, 2007 04:19 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 17, 2007 04:25 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Howie at June 17, 2007 07:41 PM (YHZAl)
Reading your comments, I must say, I feel I should temper myself since as you correctly point out we do have the touchstone, don't we? It is by their fruits that we know them. I would be categorically iniquitous if I didn't mention that I have in fact known Muslims who are not only decent folks but heroically and selflessly so; but I wonder if these few precious souls knew the full extent of the ideology that they are votaries of. Put another way, I honestly don't care by what name people call God if at all; what I care about is how they treat their fellow man. Do they respect other peoples lives, liberties, property and dignity? If they do, then they are good people. Otherwise......
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 17, 2007 10:17 PM (EdIIN)
Democracy rules: DON'T BE SILLY! Religions have been outlawed before. Example: The thugee religion in India. Why because the believed in killing people. Just like Islam. OUTLAWING ISLAM is the only way to avoid future chaos in America. Isn't Europe a good example?
Posted by: greyrooster at June 18, 2007 10:01 PM (P3TAU)
Posted by: csqk tdel at June 26, 2007 07:41 PM (rlvd7)
34 queries taking 0.0996 seconds, 168 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
