January 31, 2007
Iran Orchestrated The Karbala Attack
According to no-linky Drudge:
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
NBC NEWS confirms a secret U.S. military report that says 'Iranian Agents' may be behind a deadly ambush in Karbala, Iraq that left five American soldiers dead. The report also claims the Iranian revolutionary guard is providing intelligence on U.S. and Iraqi military to Shiite extremists, in addition to sophisticated weaponry. Developing...
As the Jawa Report's official Iranophobe, I'll follow no-linky Drudge's developing developments, if he has any.
Posted by: Vinnie at
12:20 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Iran does not want to be invaded. So why would they do something as obvious and heavy-handed as the Karbala attack? The answer is, they would not. Karbala was done by an interested third party to blame on Iran, to justify the coming invasion.
Posted by: Humour Dude at January 31, 2007 08:53 AM (rGgwA)
2
Keep living in your dreamworld Humour (sic) Dude.
Your assessment of Iran is incorrect. If it were correct, Iran wouldn't be interfering in the affairs of its neighbor.....and that's putting things nicely.
The correct answer (if you're even looking for one and not simply babbling because you have BDS) is that Iran has designs on being the dominant force in the ME (if not a global "goto guy" for Anti-Americans everywhere).
You obviously know NOTHING about the mullahs of Iran nor the current President and their beliefs. They believe that through their actions they will bring the hidden the 12th imam (Muhammed Mahdi) out from hiding and he will bring about the destruction of Israel and 'the West'. As such, they believe that they are somehow immune to reprisal by us "infidel" (I hope that word can be used in the plural..) and feel justified in carrying on with their goal of Islamiscising the world in the worst way.
Sorry for having to be so curt with you....but I have little time to correct youts such as yourself or the uninformed and as such have to fulfill my own idiosyncratic selfish desire for "the smackdown" at the same time.
Your assessment of Iran is incorrect. If it were correct, Iran wouldn't be interfering in the affairs of its neighbor.....and that's putting things nicely.
The correct answer (if you're even looking for one and not simply babbling because you have BDS) is that Iran has designs on being the dominant force in the ME (if not a global "goto guy" for Anti-Americans everywhere).
You obviously know NOTHING about the mullahs of Iran nor the current President and their beliefs. They believe that through their actions they will bring the hidden the 12th imam (Muhammed Mahdi) out from hiding and he will bring about the destruction of Israel and 'the West'. As such, they believe that they are somehow immune to reprisal by us "infidel" (I hope that word can be used in the plural..) and feel justified in carrying on with their goal of Islamiscising the world in the worst way.
Sorry for having to be so curt with you....but I have little time to correct youts such as yourself or the uninformed and as such have to fulfill my own idiosyncratic selfish desire for "the smackdown" at the same time.
Posted by: mrclark at January 31, 2007 09:12 AM (tY7kt)
3
Humourless Dude:
Why would they do something like be involved with the Karbala attack. Simple: because they have their heads up their asses. Just like you.
Why would they do something like be involved with the Karbala attack. Simple: because they have their heads up their asses. Just like you.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 31, 2007 10:00 AM (w+w6p)
4
So why would they do something as obvious and heavy-handed as the Karbala attack?
Iran can act with impunity because they know the West is infested with Leftard fifth columnists like you who will apologize for and defend them against the eeeeevil Bushites.
Iran can act with impunity because they know the West is infested with Leftard fifth columnists like you who will apologize for and defend them against the eeeeevil Bushites.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 31, 2007 10:06 AM (8e/V4)
5
"revolutionary guard is providing intelligence on U.S. and Iraqi military to Shiite extremists"
Vinnie,
A couple of years ago the Islamic Republic paid the Russians to launch a sattelite for them with the express purpose of spying on coalition troops in Iraq and on the IDF. So, I wished the US would knock that satellite out with a Pegasus missile or something.
"in addition to sophisticated weaponry"
This one is nothing new. They've been doing this for at least two years.
More importantly I think it's about time the SAS and/or their American counterparts conducted revenge raids (covertly or overtly) against the revolutionary guard corps bases IRGC ("Pasdaran") inside Iran to kill at least a dozen of them for each coalition casualty.
Vinnie,
A couple of years ago the Islamic Republic paid the Russians to launch a sattelite for them with the express purpose of spying on coalition troops in Iraq and on the IDF. So, I wished the US would knock that satellite out with a Pegasus missile or something.
"in addition to sophisticated weaponry"
This one is nothing new. They've been doing this for at least two years.
More importantly I think it's about time the SAS and/or their American counterparts conducted revenge raids (covertly or overtly) against the revolutionary guard corps bases IRGC ("Pasdaran") inside Iran to kill at least a dozen of them for each coalition casualty.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at January 31, 2007 11:18 AM (vixLB)
6
"interfering in the affairs of its neighbor," mr clark? of course, the US is interfering in the affairs of its non-neighbor, and the Iraqi
Shias find that more objectioable, by and large.
Shias find that more objectioable, by and large.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at January 31, 2007 07:24 PM (7GYBH)
7
uh.. Ken Hoop..I think you mean the 'Iranian' shiia.
You're reference to any Iraqi shiia wanting us out bears the ring of truth when applied to those controlled by the mullahs of Iran....which of course makes them "Iranian" shiia by default..
I have a dollar for you...I suggest you use it to buy a clue.
And, I'll have you know...the citizens of the US will interfere with the plans of any neighbor or non-neighbor when said party presents a danger to our citizens....
end of line.
You're reference to any Iraqi shiia wanting us out bears the ring of truth when applied to those controlled by the mullahs of Iran....which of course makes them "Iranian" shiia by default..
I have a dollar for you...I suggest you use it to buy a clue.
And, I'll have you know...the citizens of the US will interfere with the plans of any neighbor or non-neighbor when said party presents a danger to our citizens....
end of line.
Posted by: mrclark at February 01, 2007 12:32 PM (z91gt)
8
Isolationist = ostrich ... USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 03, 2007 05:28 AM (2OHpj)
33kb generated in CPU 0.0121, elapsed 0.0777 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.071 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.071 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
