August 22, 2006

Iran Attacks Romanian Oil Rig

Okay, so maybe a loon or two in Iran are taking this 8/22 thing a little too seriously? But, in my book, it's sheer coincidence. Since when have the mad mullahs ever needed an excuse to act irrationally?

Bloomberg:

Iran attacked and seized control of a Romanian oil rig working in its Persian Gulf waters this morning one week after the Iranian government accused the European drilling company of ``hijacking'' another rig.

An Iranian naval vessel fired on the rig owned by Romania's Grup Servicii Petroliere (GSP) in the Salman field and took control of its radio room at about 7:00 a.m. local time, Lulu Tabanesku, Grup's representative in the United Arab Emirates said in a phone interview from Dubai today.

``The Iranians fired at the rig's crane with machine guns,'' Tabanesku said. ``They are in control now and we can't contact the rig.'' The Romanian company has 26 workers on the platform, he said.

Hat tip: Patrick

UPDATE: Apparently the oil rig was being run by.....wait for it...Halliburton. So, I guess the Iranians are the good guys after all?

Posted by: Rusty at 07:51 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.

1 A statement from oil rig company executive here:
http://www.thenewamericancitizen.com/2006/08/22/today-is-the-era-of-thoughts-dialogue-and-cultural-exchanges/

Posted by: Agent Meatball at August 22, 2006 09:39 AM (30FRH)

2 It wasn't really the Iranians of course; it was - wait for it - da JOOOOOOOOOOoooooooozzz!!!

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 22, 2006 10:16 AM (v3I+x)

3 From an elevated position they could not fire back? What a bunch of pussies.

Posted by: Leatherneck at August 22, 2006 02:46 PM (D2g/j)

4 So attacking property owned by an American Corp. makes these camel humpers the good guys in your book??? I hope you remember saying that when you're bowing 5 times day to Mecca you scumbag.

Posted by: Jeff at August 22, 2006 03:06 PM (/mMZW)

5 I have not seen any mention of this at any other news outlets.

Posted by: SeeMonk at August 22, 2006 03:17 PM (7teJ9)

6 Jeff have you ever heard of the word sarcasm?

Posted by: Howie at August 22, 2006 03:26 PM (YdcZ0)

7 Jeff, He was trying to sound like the left. We call it making fun of, and some call it trying to sound as insane as the left.

You should write I am sorry for that post. If you don't, you are not a man, but a little shit head that just drives by yelling stupid crap.

Posted by: Leatherneck at August 22, 2006 03:42 PM (8uWFo)

8 Quit beating around the bush Letherneck; tell us how you really feel.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 22, 2006 07:41 PM (v3I+x)

9 I don't think this is a random act, or an act of insanity.

This happened a few hours before Iran delivered its response to the UN regarding its nuclear program.

Since this is not getting any significant play in the US yet, here is some other stuff you might like to know. For starters, bloomberg news reports:
The U.A.E.-registered drilling company had signed a preliminary contract with Halliburton Co. after winning an estimated $310 million contract to develop phases 9 and 10 of Iran's offshore South Pars gas reservoir.

This rig is not the one that is the subject of Iran's legal dispute with GPS. It was being removed from Iranian waters when they took it by force. I suspect that Halliburton et al, were interested in removing the rig in anticipation of hostilities. The idea being to move it to safe harbor until the shooting stops so they don't freeze your assets.

This attack "sends a message that Iran can project its power and could interfere in oil production," according to one analyst. Kish is in southern Persian Gulf not far from the Straits of Hormuz. 20% of the world's oil passes through that choke point.

This move at this time is very good if you want to do the following:
a) make a military statement without directly attacking an Arab neighbor
b) muddy the water by attacking a private asset belonging to a company associated with a NATO country government
c) make a statement that will get immediate attention at the White House
d) leave lots of room to escalate.

Is it me, or is it getting hot in here?

Posted by: 8ackgr0und N015e at August 24, 2006 12:01 AM (t4Rmq)

10 I don't think this is a random act, or an act of insanity.

This happened a few hours before Iran delivered its response to the UN regarding its nuclear program.

Since this is not getting any significant play in the US yet, here is some other stuff you might like to know. For starters, bloomberg news reports:
The U.A.E.-registered drilling company had signed a preliminary contract with Halliburton Co. after winning an estimated $310 million contract to develop phases 9 and 10 of Iran's offshore South Pars gas reservoir.

This rig is not the one that is the subject of Iran's legal dispute with GPS. It was being removed from Iranian waters when they took it by force. I suspect that Halliburton et al, were interested in removing the rig in anticipation of hostilities. The idea being to move it to safe harbor until the shooting stops so they don't freeze your assets.

This attack "sends a message that Iran can project its power and could interfere in oil production," according to one analyst. Kish is in southern Persian Gulf not far from the Straits of Hormuz. 20% of the world's oil passes through that choke point.

This move at this time is very good if you want to do the following:
a) make a military statement without directly attacking an Arab neighbor
b) muddy the water by attacking a private asset belonging to a company associated with a NATO country government
c) make a statement that will get immediate attention at the White House
d) leave lots of room to escalate.

Is it me, or is it getting hot in here?

Posted by: 8ackgr0und N015e at August 24, 2006 12:03 AM (t4Rmq)

11 Well now,  the 'baddy' Iran storms another country's oil rig & opens fire - AND THERE ARE NO MAINSTREAM NEWS REPORTS ABOUT IT???
 
Something is not quite right here.  From <a href="http://www.menareport.com/en/business/202033">here</a>,
"The rigs were hired by Dubai-based Oriental Oil Co. and without the consent of GSP ...
GSP later discovered that the Dubai-based company had never existed and it was never registered with the Dubai Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DCCI)."
 
Now the the Dubai-based company 'Oriental Oil Company' (that never existed and was never registered with the DCCI), is same as the Oriental Oil Kish, referred to in the report
<a href="http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3040">here</a>, & linked to Halliburton & the Iranian Nuclear negotiators.etc.
 
"Other senior executives of the oil company facing charges include managing director Mohammad Madani, Chief Executive Officer Ali Matin Nejati, and operations director Ahmad Salari.

The Tehran-based daily Kayhan reported that investigators had discovered one million dollars in cash at the home of one of the detained oil executives. “Powerful figures have been exerting pressure to secure his release, but Judiciary Chief Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi has insisted that the case be prosecuted”, the daily wrote, adding that it would uncover “a chain of corruption and embezzlement scams”.

Oriental Oil Kish first blipped on the international media’s radar screen in January, when it was announced that the company had subcontracted parts of the South Pars drilling project to Halliburton Products and Services registered in the Cayman Islands.

“Nasseri, a senior Iranian diplomat negotiating with Europe over Iran's controversial nuclear programme is at the heart of deals with US energy companies to develop the country's oil industry”, the Financial Times wrote."
 
Something is afoot & the news reports are steering clear of things..........

 

Posted by: barry at August 24, 2006 03:16 AM (HHpsa)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
37kb generated in CPU 0.0198, elapsed 0.1217 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.1102 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.