February 08, 2007
------
Coalition forces in Iraq have delivered a series of stunning blows to al Qaeda in Iraq in the last 48 hours.
A key aide to Abu Ayyub al-Masri, the man who replaced Abu Musab al Zarqawi as the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, has been captured south of Baghdad. As A.J. Strata notes, the trail to the al Qaeda leader is fresh: the captured aide admitted to meeting with al Masri yesterday.
Since Taji is north of Baghdad, these two al Qaeda IED cell leaders captured by the U.S. in West Taji are not the same as those above. That's four al Qaeda leaders captured.
But four is such a lonely number. A facilitator of foreign fighters was captured by the Iarqi Army on the Syrian border. And foreign fighters tend to mean al Qaeda.
Not to be outdone by the IA, the U.S. struck two houses where foreign fighters had gathered---13 jihadis dead. An "individual" associated with foreign fighter facilitation was in the targeted area.
But wait, that's not all. Coalition Forces conducted an air strike Wednesday targeting an al-Qaida in Iraq-related vehicle-borne improvised explosives devices network near Arab Jabour. Intelligence reports indicated that this network is responsible for a large and devastating number of VBIED attacks in the Baghdad area. They are also responsible for IED and sniper attacks conducted against the Iraqi people and Iraqi and Coalition Forces. Building destroyed, everyone inside presumably dead.
And another terrorist was captured in Taji. In addition to leading a bombing cell, he is also believed to be involved in taking Iraqis hostage and murdering them. Which would mean that he is either al Qaeda or one of the related organizations under the umbrella of the "Islamic State of Iraq".
So, we have 6 al Qaeda leaders captured, and possibly dozens more killed. All in the last 48 hours.
Do you see a pattern here? The little bastard al Masri better run and hide. Al Qaeda, you are our bitches!
So, will you see this in the news? No. You. Won't.
FYI--Abu Omar al-Baghdadi is head of "The Islamic State of Iraq". When the jihadi umbrella organization and "shadow government" of "The Islamic State of Iraq" (formerly called "The Mujahideen Shura Council") was formed by al Qaeda, it was thought that the spokesman should be Iraqi. Thus, al-Baghdadi (meaning "from Baghdad") was chosen as its "emir". But there is little doubt that the Islamic State of Iraq is just a PR gimmick. To what extent al-Baghdadi has any actual control over al Qaeda is really unknown. Not that any one at the NYT knows this.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:54 AM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 478 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: blackflag at February 08, 2007 11:58 AM (Mq5jS)
Posted by: DAT at February 08, 2007 12:07 PM (DZE4e)
Sorry, when I come to Jawa Report from CNN, I get confused from time to time.
Posted by: MidnightSun at February 08, 2007 12:50 PM (tq7s9)
Ah that feels good! Very very therapeutic!
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 08, 2007 01:45 PM (vixLB)
There's still time. If America hasn't lost by 2009, Hillary promises to surrender if she becomes president.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 08, 2007 02:42 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Editor at February 08, 2007 03:23 PM (adpJH)
Your time is coming Mr. al Masri.
Posted by: Richard Romano at February 08, 2007 03:27 PM (/2Xsz)
Dr. S.,
Yes that's the correct translation similiary al-Misri means from Egypt etc.
Also FYI the word "emir" means "commander" it comes from the root "amar" meaning "to order".
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 08, 2007 04:42 PM (vixLB)
Jesus panty sniffing Christ guys... even the Cato Institute knows this:
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=7353
I guess though they're just a buncha lefty pansies who want to lose the war right?
Posted by: John at February 08, 2007 06:43 PM (S3Rzh)
From The Myth of an al Qaeda Takeover of Iraq
by Ted Galen Carpenter from the link just above.
"The notion of al Qaeda using Iraq as a sanctuary is a specter -- a canard that the perpetrators of the current catastrophe use to frighten people into supporting a fatally flawed, and seemingly endless, nation-building debacle.
This article appeared in the Sacramento Bee Register on January 28, 2007."
YES Mr. Carpenter wants us to lose! His choice of elaborations makes his biases quite clear.
Nothing new here folks, just more leftist obfuscations.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 08, 2007 07:18 PM (2OHpj)
The coalition ain't just killing al-Qaeda; they've also been dispatching your Shi'ah buddies to the infernal regions in bundles of hundreds at a time. This is in addition to the Islamists of other sects that you Islamists yourselves have been killing.
Ha Hah ha ha ha Ha Hah ha ha ha Ha Hah ha ha ha
Ha Hah ha ha ha Ha Hah ha ha ha Ha Hah ha ha ha
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 08, 2007 07:24 PM (vixLB)
Posted by: tim at February 08, 2007 08:16 PM (PNdsP)
John,
so Leftards get to naysay about Iraq being a "distraction" from the war on terror, and also naysay when we kill AQ fighters there. LOL. I guess somehow that makes perfect sense if you're a Leftard.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 08, 2007 08:30 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 08, 2007 08:49 PM (ZAZT9)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 09, 2007 08:09 AM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 09, 2007 08:31 AM (ap7th)
Posted by: Howie at February 09, 2007 05:30 PM (YHZAl)
Posted by: tbone at February 10, 2007 05:05 AM (iK3oF)
You tell me. Because I know you're not advocating an invasion of two more countries. It's just a clever way of naysaying. It's the same old same old, lose if we do, lose if we don't.
But to answer your question. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are handling AQ just fine without our help. Soon Iraq will too.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 10, 2007 10:20 AM (8e/V4)
34 queries taking 0.907 seconds, 174 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.