jawa.mee.nu

March 21, 2007

Idiotic Democrat / MSM Full-Court Press

Pay attention. You are in the midst of witnessing a Demediacrat power grab / political hit job of magnificent proportions. Its like watching a herd of shrieking buffalo barreling through the front window of the china shop of everyday politics.

We have the LA Times propagandizing for the Democrats.

We have the Democrats ignoring the letters of the law and openly sabotaging the war (while simultaneously porking THE CHILDREN and THE FUTURE further into bankruptcy). Isn't Pelosi a grandmother?

We have more Soviet show trials for the prosecution of non-existent (and often Democrat utilized) crimes.

We have Democrats already campaigning off of this stupidity.

Its a good thing that Congress is polling worse than Bush.

$64,000 Dollar Q: For such a clear and forceful "mandate" in 2006, isn't 28% a little on the appallingly bad side?

ht: AllahP

Posted by: Good Lt. at 11:57 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 2 kb.

1 And here's the answer to your question: The Dems never had a mandate to begin with.

November 2006 was all about punishing the Republicans for abandoning their conservative base. Look at many of the Dems that ousted Reps. They camaigned more conservative than the GOP candidates did! November was all about the people raising their voices and demanding Conservatism and Traditionalism.

It's unfortunate that the Dems won the majority as a side-effect of this, but it happened. Fortunately, this also means that they have no mandate, and the conservatism of the baby Donks combined with the extreme liberalism of the older Dems will (and is) tearing them apart.

Posted by: Wearyman at March 21, 2007 12:20 PM (puky3)

2 My theory is that the electorate gave the Dems the legislative branch back just to remind themselves why they gave it to the Republicans in the first place. Sort of like when - once every couple of years or so - I'll get drunk on Scotch. When I wake up with a kill-me-now hangover the next day, I remember why I stopped drinking Scotch. This time I'm hopeful that we'll get a Democrat administration in the executive branch as well. The electoral hangover from the combination of legislative branch Scotch and executive branch Gin ought to put the Republicans back in for at least a generation or two.

I always return to good, old, conservative Tequila shots (No training wheels) and Coors. Good Tequila - my current fave is the Herradura reposado - never hangs me over. Neither does Coors. Scotch is distilled suicide concentrate in a fancy bottle. So is Budweiser: It has RICE in it, forchrissakes! *gag... retch*

Rice is for Sake.

But, I digress...

Posted by: Hucbald at March 21, 2007 01:01 PM (kjzzt)

3 "... as soon as we put away all criminal capitalists, Peter, we shall have a wonderful socialitic life, like comrade Stalin told us we would..."
quote from a 1930s Soviet movie made in time period of Stalins' witch hunt trials...

Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at March 21, 2007 01:35 PM (gtZwa)

4 All targeted at America's sucker vote.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 21, 2007 02:00 PM (8e/V4)

5 "Idiotic Democrat" .... redundant but true !!

Posted by: memphis761 at March 21, 2007 02:43 PM (YHZAl)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

32kb generated in CPU 0.022, elapsed 0.0829 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0725 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

March 21, 2007

Recent Comments