August 14, 2006

Hizb'Allah is Everywhere

First, this footage of a Paris Hizb'Allah rally, courtesy of Moonbat Media:

Then there's this footage of this D.C. rally, courtesy of Age of Hooper

Posted by: Ragnar at 01:06 AM | Comments (20) | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Pigs.

Posted by: Fernando Rivera at August 14, 2006 06:53 AM (piM5f)

2 It's the marker that tells you that we're not yet serious about our rhetoric after 9/11. If we were, everyone in that DC march would have been rounded up and deported (if not citizens), and put on a terror watch list in any case. Many of them would perhaps have been jailed. We are acting timidly, and for that reason will be utterly shocked, shocked I tell you when Islamists here conduct or support another 9/11-scale attack in the US. We know much, and do little, to our shame and eventually to our pain.

Posted by: Jeff Medcalf at August 14, 2006 07:02 AM (7Q2cA)

3 Yup, something is seriously wrong when hizbullah is listed as a terrorist organization and an ally is engaged in war with them and a masked supporter goes unarrested - something is very, very wrong. On US soil a supporter of a terrorist group conceals his identity and goes unchecked. I'm seriously beginning to wonder if another 9/11 would even wake this nation up - I doubt it.

Posted by: goesh at August 14, 2006 07:11 AM (1w6Ud)

4 Fore! For those of you who are new, that is the sound George makes on his many, many war-time vacations ......

Posted by: Last gasp Larry at August 14, 2006 08:38 AM (gLMre)

5 Glad I spent last night on the Gulf fishing. There is as much reason to throw up here as there.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 14, 2006 09:11 AM (N0n43)

6 I am Canadian and like Americans I live in an absolute democracy. We can demonstrate for or against our government or anything else -- an enshrined right in Canada.

In my home town of Montreal, Canada there was a demonstration on Sunday, August 6th 2006 against the war in Lebanon [however, it turned out to be an anti-Israel demonstration]. Local and provincial politicians were invited to attend...and they did [looking for potential voters?]. Hezbollah and Hamas are deemed terrorist organizations in Canada and are illegal.

While most protesters carried Lebanese flags there were Hezbollah flags too...illegal in Canada. No action was taken against demonstrators with Hezbollah flags. If we in the west wish to preserve our Western civilization and our democratic ways, we must enforce our own laws. Not arresting those demonstrators with Hezoballah flags is wrong. Who told the police to look the other way? and why?

Another thing which most of us in democracies do not do when demonstrating is cover our faces. When people cover their faces to hid their identities, I figure they are my enemy.

The governments of Canada and the United States are correct in supporting Israel. Israel, a democratic Western nation was attacked by terrorists. Western nations have the right to protect themselves against acts of war committed by terrorists. It is sad innocent children die because they and their mothers are being used as human shields. But it is NOT us, the Western nations that use human shields...it is terrorist agents in non-democratic countries who do and in doing so, they are guily of crimes against humanity.

Very happy to have found http://kenlydell.typepad.com/islamic_evil

Coventina

Posted by: Coventina at August 14, 2006 09:26 AM (eirIx)

7 Haywood believes in free speech, but to support of those who wish all of us dead is asking for an ass whooping. At least check that wannabe terrorist's id.

It's as if you want to burn a flag to show that you don't appreciate how nice you have it here, then you have that right, but try to do it in Haywood's presence, and you'll be exercising your right to urgent health care.

Posted by: haywood jablowmi at August 14, 2006 10:17 AM (VUmVc)

8 I recognize the eyes. Yes it is! It is Jill Carrol, I am sad to inform !

Posted by: Last gasp Larry at August 14, 2006 10:36 AM (gLMre)

9 Did Jorje the Pizza man morph into Fernando the smooth epithaph tossing pizza master of the lame comback?

Posted by: SeeMonk at August 14, 2006 10:57 AM (7teJ9)

10 Hmmm... if I remember correctly, as a reaction to the KKK, and in an effort to suppress its activities, it was made illegal for any person to disguise or hide their identity in public. So why is the law not being applied to muslims?
Our government has surrendered to terrorism and we are abandoned to their tender mercies, and if we fight back, the government will come down on us like they did at Ruby Ridge and Waco. The government is not fighting islam, as it should, but is trying to make the conquest as bloodless as possible, in the interest of "peace". Our government is a coalition of cowards and traitors, and cannot be trusted.
It's up to us to defend our nation. It's not just our right - it's our duty. Any person, whether civilian, police, or military, who stands against We, the People in our efforts to defend ourselves is a traitor and an enemy, and must be treated as such, without mercy.
Now is the time to choose; prepare to fight, or accept slavery. There is no third option.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 14, 2006 11:09 AM (v3I+x)

11 It did seem the Govt was more concerned with who was living in the woods in Northern Idaho than who was interested in blowing up planes. But then, during the two years I lived in Spokane, there were four or five pipe bombs set off in Spokane.

Posted by: SeeMonk at August 14, 2006 11:19 AM (7teJ9)

12 IM: Bingo. No shit. Neither the Government or the Academic meatheads in our universities are doing their tax supported job. One ignores the terrorist demonstrations and the other shouts freedom of expression. That is if that group is not pro white. Some actually say we need these middle eastern animals in our country. For the sake of what? More traffic jams? More cell phone sales?
That's not what the founding fathers meant when they said freedom of speech.
Next some idiot from academia will conclude that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to a muslim is killing all other people. Therefore they're guaranteed that right by the Constitution.
Both our Government and our Universities needs an enema.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 14, 2006 12:07 PM (L92U0)

13 Yesterday I stayed in pretty much all day, watching the History Channel air program after program about what...? White "supremacists", of course! Yep, everyone knows there is no threat from any other quarter but White Christians.
The Weavers were plotting the takeover of the planet, which is why a fourteen year old boy was shot in the back, and a mother holding her baby killed by an FBI sniper. And Waco? Yep, you guess it; they were going to overthrow the government through obscure, fringe religious beliefs, and had to be put down with heavy armor and machine guns. God bless Bill Clinton and Janet Reno for saving us from these horrible, dangerous people, and bless the History Channel for reminding us that White Christians are the greatest threat to humanity.
Nothing to see here, move along...

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 14, 2006 12:50 PM (v3I+x)

14 But the majority of people were conditioned to that response by Whom? De Govement, de schools and de newpapers.
Jus ax em.

Yea man. Those people in Waco were a danger to this nation. They were fixing to invade Texas. Just ask the dog ugly, lesbian, monstrosity that Rhodes scholar Clinton appointed as Attorney General.
Clinton was the #1 Academic meathead.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 14, 2006 01:05 PM (L92U0)

15 IM: I attempted to watch those programs. Yesterday afternoon we went 60 miles off shore. We were trolling and the TV kept going in and out. The trouble with my satallite (Direct TV)is that it resets itself every time it loses signal. This takes about 3 minutes. Fish were biting and I drank too much and fell asleep in my deck chair. My good friends let me sleep until I turned bright red with sunburn. But payback will be a mother.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 14, 2006 01:12 PM (L92U0)

16 Let me summarize for you since you missed it Rooster:
White Christians are the only evil in the world, and all misery in the world flows from them.
White people who want to live in peace among their own kind must be exposed and destroyed.
White Christians are the only threat to the safety and existance of Jews.
Neo-Nazi's are representative of all White Christians.
Black and Hispanic gangs, and the violence they perpetrate, are directly caused by White Christians.
Timothy McVeigh is the icon of terrorism.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 14, 2006 01:34 PM (v3I+x)

17 Oh! I thought they had someting new.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 14, 2006 04:03 PM (AzkTD)

18 Don't forget to globalize yourself. The History channel states that every 10min. Who owns the History channel, and why do they want people to hear Gobalize Yourself over, and over, and over...?

Many fronts, one war.

Posted by: Leatherneck at August 14, 2006 05:59 PM (D2g/j)

19 Yea! The history channel diffinately has some liberals on the payroll. Who knows maybe even a few dog shit muslims.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 14, 2006 08:20 PM (y5dGS)

20 I got this reply from the D.C. police regarding the against wearing of masks in public:



District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition Currentness
Division IV. Criminal Law and Procedure and Prisoners.

Title 22. Criminal Offenses and Penalties. (Refs & Annos)

Subtitle I. Criminal Offenses.

Chapter 33. Trespass; Injuries to Property.

§ 22-3312.03. Wearing hoods or masks.



(a) No person or persons over 16 years of age, while wearing any mask, hood, or device whereby any portion of the face is hidden, concealed, or covered as to conceal the identity of the wearer, shall:

(1) Enter upon, be, or appear upon any lane, walk, alley, street, road highway, or other public way in the District of Columbia;

(2) Enter upon, be, or appear upon or within the public property of the District of Columbia; or

(3) Hold any manner of meeting or demonstration.


(b) The provisions of subsection (a) of this section apply only if the person was wearing the hood, mask, or other device:

(1) With the intent to deprive any person or class of persons of equal protection of the law or of equal privileges and immunities under the law, or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of the United States or the District of Columbia from giving or securing for all persons within the District of Columbia equal protection of the law;

(2) With the intent, by force or threat of force, to injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person because of his or her exercise of any right secured by federal or District of Columbia laws, or to intimidate any person or any class of persons from exercising any right secured by federal or District of Columbia laws;

(3) With the intent to intimidate, threaten, abuse, or harass any other person;

(4) With the intent to cause another person to fear for his or her personal safety, or, where it is probable that reasonable persons will be put in fear for their personal safety by the defendant's actions, with reckless disregard for that probability; or

(5) While engaged in conduct prohibited by civil or criminal law, with the intent of avoiding identification.
end

Posted by: Kurt at August 17, 2006 09:52 AM (tPPP4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
42kb generated in CPU 0.1588, elapsed 0.2201 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.2103 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.