May 16, 2007

'Global Warming' Update: Scientists Backpeddling, Now Skeptical

You don't say? Someone page Lorrie David for her no-doubt ultra-informed reaction to this.

When you cut through the hysteria and media hype, anthropogenic global warming is little more than another phony issue in the Democrat platform used to attack private industry, consumer choice and to advance Democrat politicians and causes.

We never would have guessed that.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 10:12 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.

1 "Geophysicist Dr. Claude Allegre, atop geophysicist and French Socialist who has authored more than 100 scientific articles and written 11 books and received numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States, converted from climate alarmist to skeptic in 2006."
 
Dear Global Warmingists,
 
I don't mean to sound negative, but when you lose the coveted "French Socialist" voting bloc, it just might be time to call it a day. 

Posted by: Buckley F. Williams at May 16, 2007 01:03 PM (/XWKc)

2 I saw this today and decided to do a 'blog' article on it          
 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070516/ap_on_re_mi_ea/greenpeace_noah_s_ark
 
Just to funny!  Iconic, Ironic, Moronic!          Also well done Buckly F!
               USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at May 16, 2007 01:13 PM (2OHpj)

3 Does this mean I am not going to be able to sell carbon credits now???
 
 
 
 
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

Posted by: doriangrey at May 16, 2007 02:15 PM (XvkRd)

Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at May 16, 2007 02:23 PM (gtZwa)

5 Well, I guess if we just all sit around the campfire and "believe" there's no global warming, it'll refreeze all that melted arctic icecap.  Of course it's making it harder for our nukes to hide under the ice:
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/01/03/arctic.ice/index.html


Posted by: Dave at May 16, 2007 10:14 PM (5zxY/)

6 You can't read...can you Dave. The debate is not IF we are warming but rather the primary cause.

Posted by: Randman at May 16, 2007 11:13 PM (Sal3J)

7 Right, the primary cause is Islamofacists.  Still need a place to hide the nukes.

Posted by: Dave at May 17, 2007 12:51 AM (5zxY/)

8 Yep...can't read or follow the conversation.

Posted by: Randman at May 17, 2007 01:36 AM (Sal3J)

9 The debate is not IF we are warming but rather the primary cause.

But they'd rather argue about whether IF we're warming.  That way they can keep arguing with their little strawman who doesn't answer back.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 17, 2007 08:59 AM (8e/V4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
33kb generated in CPU 0.0118, elapsed 0.0753 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0688 seconds, 164 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.