1 Being a Leftard and marching in lockstep is so much easier than thinking though!  Plus you get that warm fuzzy feeling that goes along with being a Leftard.

2 Data presented by Shaviv and Veizer claiming global climate change is not caused by man made greenhouse gases and that cosmisc rays are the cause is unfounded based on faulty research.
 
Two curves presented in their report which are meant to show a statistical correlation were found to have been adjusted by the authors, in one case by 40 Million years. 
 
And this is what you predicate your denial of climate change on.  Researchers who must adjust their data to support a lie being told so you can pretend you know something about which you have no clue.
 
God, I feel sorry for you.

3 were found to have been adjusted by the authors,

There were not "adjusted" by the authors, ya lying moron.  Rahmstorf simply used a different formula than they did to to arrive at his curves.  Currently the eggheads are debating whose methodology was the correct one (I couldn't make heads or tails of it myself).

4 They were not adjusted...

5 Researchers who must adjust their data to support a
lie being told so
Posted by: civil behavior at February 04, 2007 04:25 PM

Ah yes the typical leftard debate tactic accuse the other side of doing what you are doing or as a good friend of mine once said "deny everything and make counter accusations" anywho CO2 is an infantismal part of total atmospheric gases as a matter of fact it is only 10¹⁹ of total gases a far more prolific and heat retaining gas in fact is water vapor, so tell me cb do you recommend we not use hydrogen fuel technology since it produces water vapor as a by product? The hubris and arrogance of the global warming crowd is amazing, you actually believe we can predict the weather or even understand how the climate works on a global scale and then go even further into your delusion that even if we can predict it we can do something about it. You are the one who needs pity.

6 Simply put there is no debate on the correlation of increased CO2 emissons and the warming of the climate AND at this point it is highly doubtful that models can show the extent of warming without accounting for anthropogenic forcings.
 
 
Shaviv and Veizer's highly questionable methods of adjusting the data so as to conclude that the effect of cosmic ray alters or nearly overwhelms CO2  contribution to climate sensitivity aligns their hypothesis with the likes of Lindzen, Singer and the numerous industry shills that have been exposed over and over. 
 
Of course why would we expect the remaining deadend supporters of Bush (now in a very small minority) to say much else.
 
Foolish Americans.........can't be part of any solution just destruction....pathetic.

7 Grasp those straws.

Your religion is a sham.

8 adjusting

By your continued use of that term you only expose yourself as a propagandist, and confirm what we already know about this global warming hysteria-- it's not about science, it's about propaganda.  Just keep repeating it enough and it becomes true.

9 <blockquote>simply put there is no debate on the correlation of increased CO2 emissons and the warming of the climate
Posted by: civil behavior at February 04, 2007 08:58 PM</blockquote>

Really? You my friend suffer from a mental disease that a commenter on another thread here called invincible ignorance the first symptom of which is making statements like the above. you are truly suffering I pity you.

10 Why is it Good Lt. and Carlos are unable to present me with any reasonable science that supports their denial of climate change other than paltry mushy words paid for by oil and coal industry shills .....
 
 
Explain why denying science is so necessary to your ego.  What do you have to gain from denying science? 

11 Snivel behavior: Copying others articles word for word make you feel like you know something. But we know better.  You think others don't read the same articles? Those chicken wings and watermelon are messing with your mind. Friggin mental midget.

12 paid for by oil and coal industry shills .....

I'll ask you this first, seeing as you've tried avoiding it on previous threads.  Don't you think that Kyoto without China and India will cause MORE pollution, not less, because our industries will migrate to those countries with less controls?  Answer the question already, or get the fuck off this blog you leftwing blowhard.

Re "oil companies", obviously you're more interested in slogans and propaganda than reasonable science.  And I second rooster.  Copying word for word from an article about matters you haven't the slightest clue about only makes you look like a mindless gorebot.

13 Snivel:


Mean global surface temperature hasn't risen by more than 1 degree farenheit in the last 100 years. Not that anyone can say so with certainty.


There is no scientific basis for an anthropogenic warming cause.


Why do you rely on faux science? What do you have to gain from denying real science? Why do you leftist automatons fear the truth?

14 Snivel behavior: Ever had the feeling you weren't appreciated? Pollution and Global warming are two separate things. Now go away, do some research and come again when you know what you are talking about. bye, bye.

15

civil behavior,

You cannot claim the debate is over without getting a snicker out of me. If the dabate was really over, nobody would be debating it, WOULD THEY?! 

Yet here YOU are debating it, with the rest of us, hoping to what? Trying to change our minds for whatever purpose, that's what.

We find sources that say your position is wrong, and you DEBATE with us about it.  So where is this debate suppossedly over???

Well it obviously isn't.

Al (Occidental oil) Gore is flying around in his jet while you guys on his team keep saying 'ignore the man behind the curtain'. HAH! Your biggest cheerleaders in this cause are as proped up by special interest monies as anyone, and I think WE SHOULD DEBATE THAT A BIT!  Lifting up the skirt on your little global warming agenda may help us realize why none of us should want to take this date to the prom!

Your cause is a favorite of commies, socialists, and anarchists, and this global warming hysteria is just one more weapon in their war to replace our Republic, and our economic freedoms upon which our prosperity rests. Misguided fools, with a warped sense of social justice. The natural result of your sides vision is to cripple those with talent, to make those without talent feel better. Tear down those who CAN, to appease those who cannot.  That is what lies behind communism, and socialism. Destruction of the talented, and robbery of the fruits of their labors.

Besides your elitists, who think they should be in charge because they are elitists, you have a bunch of jealous parasites! THESE do nothing but ride along and suck blood while others work hard, and take risks, and pour their lives into being productive. It isn't your parasites who create all the wealth. Wealth is created by those who have the will, the persitance, and the vision to find ways to turn crap into gold. Those with a little less of these virtues can still make something of themselves by simply trying. Put a lazy clinging parasite onto the back of each one, and then see how they do. Not good! The productive will never acccept this unless they are forced to, and for that you need either violence, or crises.

So that's how to get a rope around the neck of that wild and free capitalist beast before you can pour the leeches out on him. He won't let himself be caught by a danger he can see, so to get socialism accepted you have to be creative. Bring on the lies and hysteria! Bring on 'Global warming!'  "Oh please save us members of the cultured elite! We desperately need your nanny government to tell us what to do! "  Its all bullcrap, and anyone who isn't getting all their information from the six'oclock news can see it.

You count on the lazy couch potato culture to give you your victory, and since it's so easy to get them to sit there with some beer, or pot, or whatever, and let you spoon feed them through the idiot box, it seems you've had some success.

But you have not won yet. the debate has only really just begun. Al Gore's hypocracy is one of my favorite talking points, and I'm rather fond of the midevil warm period, so lets see you suppress that! I also like the various periods of earths history where we had many times the CO2 levels that we do now, and the best part is, earth didn't burn to a cinder.

Since I know real research can be difficult for some folks, maybe you could at least watch "Walking with Dinosaurs", like the episode where we are told how Antarctica was lush and green in the summertime. Since the world didn't ever burn up before, I guess it's because dinosaurs were communists? Maybe?

In any case Al Gore will be having his bones preserved in a museum someday, and his lies will have been disproven by time. Hopefully the same museum will show that the primitives of our time rejected the voodoo of global warming, and calmly gathered FACTS upon which to make our decisions.

Meanwhile I have an inconvenient truth for you ... the debate continues!

USA, all the way!

16 In a nation led by evangelical oil barons, you, her fat children who expect resources to last forever and believe you can crap in your own nest and not need to clean up will be frantically grasping for your share of the dwindling pie while the freakish weather brought to you by more intense storms, drought, wind and yes, even piles of snow will destroy your god of money. 
 
At which point Homeland Security will take on a whole new meaning.
 
Foolish and STUPID Americanos.........

17 You give up your car yet, civil behavior?

18 Yet another substanceless post by the sniveler.

19 I'm gonna drive around the block three times today for no reason - just to piss civiloff while I burn gas. Maybe I'll take the longer, scenic route home from work. Yeah - I think I will.

And there's not a damn thing he or any other leftard can do about it.

Global cooling! Global warming! Bush-made climate change!

20 Snivel Behavior is so full of shit if he converted it to methan Los Angeles could power their cars for a year.

21 Teach, yes, by the way I have stopped driving except for one day a week to get groceries and large items.

22 I sometimes drive just to drive.

And I love it.

I burn lotssss of gas, and the weather keeps geting colder. I must be doing something right.

23 Of course you love it .........all rednecks do.

24 Snivel:


Why don't you have any facts to support your wild claims? Your handlers are behind in their game.


Sucking cocks is no substitute for the truth. Spit it out and face reality.

25 For those of you bothering to argue with the idiot-children global-warming devotees, remember--against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain....

26 "(I couldn't make heads or tails of it myself)."

mayhap you shouldn't comment on it then? or at least go out and get a degree in climatology so you can legitimately learn the issue that you debate so vociferously.



www.dictionary.com

if you need help with vociferously...

27 Jakeass:


"Up your ass."


In case you need to locate your tiny brain.


Do yourself a favor and look up "fatuous" in the dictionary. You might want to try "sophomoric" too.