1 DEMOCRATS ARE DETERMINED TO LOSE IN IRAQ BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT LIBERALS

“Liberalism (Websters): noun 1 : the quality or state of being liberal 2 a often capitalized : a movement in modern Protestantism emphasizing intellectual liberty and the spiritual and ethical content of Christianity b : a theory in economics emphasizing individual freedom from restraint and usually based on free competition, the self-regulating market, and the gold standard c : a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties d capitalized : the principles and policies of a Liberal party.”

George Bush Jr., Cheney, McCain, Gingrich, etc., constantly talk about these topics.

“Socialism (Websters): noun 1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods 2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state 3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Kerry, Edwards, Kennedy, etc. constantly talk about expanding government controls, economic leveling, controls on capitalism and competition, and top-down political structures where citizens cannot be trusted to govern themselves. With the communist scare gone, socialism is now safe, as long you call it ‘Progressivism’. The Democrat manifesto quietly chips away at the foundations of liberal democracy bit by bit, as socialists have been doing in Europe, Canada, and elsewhere for decades.

Socialism’s scope is global, they want global economic controls, global environmental controls, global government, and no wars between nations because they do not believe in nations.  They want to stop all American wars, since these would be victories for Republican liberal democracy, not socialism.  An American defeat in Iraq would be a victory for socialism, just as Vietnam was.  The Democrats support and apologize for Islamists because both groups want to defeat Republican liberal democracy. To Democrats and their fellow-traveling main-stream media, anti-war posturing is not treasonous, because they are not loyal to America.  Like most socialists, they loathe modern liberalism, and especially George Bush’s use of it, because it is their main competitor.