April 12, 2007
Fire Keith Olbermann
Olbermann wants Limbaugh fired for "racism." Olbermann conveniently forgets he imitated a Nazi, trivializing the Holocaust and offended Jews everywhere. The ADL even had to call him on it.
Firing Keith Olbermann, using his rules, for being a Holocaust-trivialising Jew-offending dolt?
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
10:59 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dear Old Keith is just another guy who's little dick can't get no attention so he uses his only gift, a vocabulary, to hide his severe depression which he heavily medicates...like that phony journalist greek ex clinton boob, George S.
Posted by: RJ at April 13, 2007 06:25 AM (yyxO/)
2
He's a pathetic little twit that deserves no attention whatsoever. How many people actually watch his "show"? 15?
Posted by: Insolent Infidel at April 13, 2007 09:05 AM (A5PXC)
3
According to Nielsen, Countdown averaged 709,000 viewers during February 2007 sweeps. That's up 59% from February '06. According to Arbitron, Limbaugh's listernship is down between 33 % and 38%, depending on the market, in the same period.
Posted by: Gleep! at April 13, 2007 09:19 AM (Zlbra)
4
Yeah. What a total dick. Who does he think he is coming out with all those valid points against the right?! Doesn't he realize that anything the rightwing does is okay, because that's what God wants for us?
Posted by: John at April 13, 2007 09:49 AM (S3Rzh)
5
And the number of listeners per week? What is it - 13.5+ million? Some Radio and Records articles put the number over 20 million.
He's got over 14 times the listeners weekly than Olberloon has viewers in a month.
I'm sure Rush is shaking in his boots.
PWNED.
He's got over 14 times the listeners weekly than Olberloon has viewers in a month.
I'm sure Rush is shaking in his boots.
PWNED.
Posted by: Good Lt at April 13, 2007 09:50 AM (yMbfY)
6
Yeah. What a total dick. Who does he think he is coming out with all
those valid points against the right?! Doesn't he realize that anything
the rightwing does is okay, because that's what God wants for us?
Firstly, you just admitted for him that he's not a newscaster or a journalist of any kind. Olbermann is a clown.
And secondly, Argue with the Anti-Defamation League, fanboy.
They're the ones that were offended by that "valid point" in the form of a Nazi salute.
those valid points against the right?! Doesn't he realize that anything
the rightwing does is okay, because that's what God wants for us?
Firstly, you just admitted for him that he's not a newscaster or a journalist of any kind. Olbermann is a clown.
And secondly, Argue with the Anti-Defamation League, fanboy.
They're the ones that were offended by that "valid point" in the form of a Nazi salute.
Posted by: Good Lt at April 13, 2007 09:55 AM (yMbfY)
Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at April 13, 2007 10:13 AM (JuCus)
8
You don't see the difference do you?
Olbermann wasn't doing the salute to say "yeah! Nazis rock!" He was doing to say that O'Reily is a repugnant swine. There is nothing racist about it. It doesn't defame anyone but O'reily.
At worst it's a boneheaded and insensitive move, but it's not even in the same ballpark as making a racial slur.
Imus has made repeated slurs agains numourous groups. This was the straw that broke the camels back. Now he can go start a stupid racist blog like this one, and say whatever looney bullshit he wants.
Olbermann wasn't doing the salute to say "yeah! Nazis rock!" He was doing to say that O'Reily is a repugnant swine. There is nothing racist about it. It doesn't defame anyone but O'reily.
At worst it's a boneheaded and insensitive move, but it's not even in the same ballpark as making a racial slur.
Imus has made repeated slurs agains numourous groups. This was the straw that broke the camels back. Now he can go start a stupid racist blog like this one, and say whatever looney bullshit he wants.
Posted by: John at April 13, 2007 10:24 AM (S3Rzh)
9
And the number of listeners per week? What is it - 13.5+ million? Some Radio and Records articles put the number over 20 million.
Radio listernship and television viewship cannot be accurately compared by the numbers. Cable is much more fragemented -- and still dominated by the networks--where as the 3-4 voices of talk radio have a virtual lock on the airwaves. So yes, it's possible a radio commentator would have listernship in the millions compared to a cable commentator's hundreds of thousands — and the cable commentator's numbers would be more impressive (add the fact that cable viewers tend to watch 30+ minutes, while radio listeners tend to listen for 6-8 minutes.)
If you want numbers, it would be more accurate to compare Olbermann to O'Reilly.
Radio listernship and television viewship cannot be accurately compared by the numbers. Cable is much more fragemented -- and still dominated by the networks--where as the 3-4 voices of talk radio have a virtual lock on the airwaves. So yes, it's possible a radio commentator would have listernship in the millions compared to a cable commentator's hundreds of thousands — and the cable commentator's numbers would be more impressive (add the fact that cable viewers tend to watch 30+ minutes, while radio listeners tend to listen for 6-8 minutes.)
If you want numbers, it would be more accurate to compare Olbermann to O'Reilly.
Posted by: Gleep! at April 13, 2007 10:41 AM (Zlbra)
10
Johnboy, you are seriously delusional. The only "valid" points he ever makes are simply lip service to the equally delusional lefturd moonbats. Perhaps you could enlighten all of us here with a selection of his "valid" points.
Posted by: Insolent Infidel at April 13, 2007 11:16 AM (A5PXC)
11
And secondly, Argue with the Anti-Defamation League, fanboy. They're the ones that were offended by that "valid point" in the form of a Nazi salute.
As an organization, the ADL specializes in looking for and typically finding things to be righteously offended about, ranking alongside the greats like Sharpton and Jesse Jackson ... if the ADL was offended by Olbermann, tell them to get over it, just like you would for those offended by Imus' comments.
As an organization, the ADL specializes in looking for and typically finding things to be righteously offended about, ranking alongside the greats like Sharpton and Jesse Jackson ... if the ADL was offended by Olbermann, tell them to get over it, just like you would for those offended by Imus' comments.
Posted by: Gleep! at April 13, 2007 12:12 PM (Zlbra)
12
Keith is searching for his nappy headed ho. Perhaps Gleep?
Posted by: greyrooster at April 15, 2007 07:29 AM (2J0r9)
13
Stupid racist blog like this one. THEN WHY IS YOUR DUMB COMMIE ASS HERE? You love it. That's why. Not fooling anyone. leave you piece of Canadian dogshit. Can't do it can you?
Posted by: greyrooster at April 15, 2007 09:05 AM (2J0r9)
14
Fire him? Wow, that's kinda harsh, don'tcha think? You neocons sure are mean-spirited. /sarcasm
You know this asshole would gleefully narrate, and live on camera at
the scene, no less, the beheading of an American soldier, and you just
want him fired? He needs to be burned alive, along with all the other
lefturds. No mercy for enemies.
You know this asshole would gleefully narrate, and live on camera at
the scene, no less, the beheading of an American soldier, and you just
want him fired? He needs to be burned alive, along with all the other
lefturds. No mercy for enemies.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 17, 2007 07:47 AM (eGb9y)
35kb generated in CPU 0.0126, elapsed 0.0711 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0641 seconds, 169 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.0641 seconds, 169 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
