July 03, 2007
STOP INTERFERING IN THE WAR ON TERRORISM. NOBODY ELECTED BILL KELLER AND PINCH SULZBERGER TO DO ANYTHING. WE KNOW YOU WANT AL-QAEDA TO WIN. YOU DON'T HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. NO, HIDING BEHIND THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT WON'T WORK.
ht: Don Surber
Posted by: Good Lt. at
06:28 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Paul Moore at July 03, 2007 07:57 PM (6drOH)
Ridiculous comments like this are what make your posts meaningless. Do you really believe the NYT wants Bin Laden to win? You don't have to agree with their actions, but to imply they are unAmerican only pollutes political discussion.
Posted by: Bo at July 03, 2007 07:58 PM (euN4c)
Lets discuss consequences. What are the consequences of the NYT disclosing classified intelligence information?
---Our enemies get our sources and methods....thus it is easier for them to kill our troops.
End of Story.
Now, we all know the NYT and the rest of the lib media have one thing on their minds.....and it is NOT America's best interest.
That ONE thing is this............HOW TO FUCK BOOOOSH AT EVERY POSSIBLE TURN.
Even if it means disclosing classified information, sources and methods. They simply turn their heads and say "Al Queda doesn't read the NYT" Oh, but they do Bo......they do.
Like I said....end of story.
Posted by: mrclark at July 03, 2007 08:50 PM (lEgmh)
Posted by: Howie at July 03, 2007 09:05 PM (YHZAl)
Posted by: greyrooster at July 03, 2007 10:27 PM (visiI)
"WE KNOW YOU WANT AL-QAEDA TO WIN" is indeed wrong- the left doesn't believe in winners, just losers.
They cynically deride the value in the lessons of hard work, preserverence, loyalty, or any value in anything really... there is nothing but failure, death and loss to the libs. They don't hope or think Al-Q can win, but they sure do want to see US lose.
Bo, do you believe in yourself?
Posted by: QC at July 03, 2007 11:39 PM (oMkSt)
I don't disagree necessarily that the left is hopelessly devoid of individual responsibility, but I'm afraid I don't quite buy the argument that they want Al-Q to win. Kerry made a point of rallying the troups around the fact that Bush abandoned the hunt for Bin Laden when he took our finite resources and plunged them into Iraq. How do you reconcile this with a blind belief that the Democrats do not want to win? All I hear is that they want to focus on the true culprits of 9/11?
Posted by: Bo at July 04, 2007 09:18 PM (euN4c)
Who? 1 person named bin Laden? What happens when he dies - terrorism ends forever?
Didn't think so.
Posted by: Good Lt at July 07, 2007 12:23 PM (yMbfY)
34 queries taking 0.0889 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
