February 20, 2007
The argument got heated and the suspect learned that the young residents had not enlisted in the military and "put their all" behind the Republican-led war effort in Iraq, police spokeswoman Natatia Bledsoe said.Oh, come on! He was probably a rabid GOP supporter, right?The suspect refused to leave the home after repeatedly being asked to do so, police said. The three roommates were hit multiple times each as they attempted to get the suspect out of the door, authorities said.
The suspect continued to be aggressive and disorderly even after a city police officer arrived, the report states.
Andrew Stone, 23, was charged with three counts of assault and battery. A magistrate released Stone on his own recognizance and he was ordered to have no further contact with the victims.
It was not clear in the report what political agenda Stone was supporting.
No, the paper apparently wasn't joking when it wrote that last line. I'll get them started with the research - tryWikipedia, for starters:
General informationSay it with me, MSM. This person of mysterious political orientation is what is known as a liberal D E M O C R A T.External Links
* "Chickenhawk Vs. Chicken Little", by Terry M. Neal, from washingtonpost.com, September 6, 2002
* Defending Kerry, senator blasts 'chickenhawks', cnn.com, April 28, 2004
* Dem Calls Cheney A 'Chickenhawk', cbsnews.com, April 29, 2004Advocates of the term:
* "Leading the charge from behind a desk" by Lionel Van Deerlin, San Diego Union-Tribune, September 4, 2002
* Operation Yellow Elephant
* The Chickenhawk Database
* "Recruit the Chickenhawks" by Michael Moore
* "What makes someone a 'chicken hawk'?" by Glenn Greenwald
ht: LGF
Posted by: Good Lt. at
01:48 PM
| Comments (39)
| Add Comment
Post contains 294 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 20, 2007 03:26 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 20, 2007 03:47 PM (ZxuJ4)
Learn the difference between a lib and a leftard. Attacking three people because they don't buy into the chicken hawk canard is neither tolerant nor progressive.
Protesting justified violence in Iraq by attacking innocent fellow Americans is exactly the sort of unhinged behaviour that reveals you leftists as the hatemongering control freaks that you are.
You mentally and emotionally unstable assholes are fighting tooth and nail to allow the terrorists to murder people in Iraq. You're fighting against your own country, as this latest attack clearly shows.
Quit posing as a moderate, you moonbat troll.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 20, 2007 06:04 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: shoogie woogie at February 20, 2007 06:20 PM (AeRA2)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 20, 2007 08:35 PM (XmI6X)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 20, 2007 08:36 PM (XmI6X)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 20, 2007 08:37 PM (XmI6X)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 20, 2007 09:05 PM (8e/V4)
Pretty much, you either agree with the hard line or you should not have the same rights. The only question is to what extent? Its become a religion. Nonbelievers are wrong to express disagreement... maybe even wrong to be free from harm, and alive.
Posted by: Javapuke at February 20, 2007 09:43 PM (QOQLc)
Jeff Rooster and Carlos talking trash at each other because THEIR WHOLE WORLD SEEMS TO BE TURNING UPSIDE DOWN
Perhaps now that the Brits are cutting and running we should begin calling them Freedom Muffins instead of English
Posted by: JOHN RYAN at February 21, 2007 12:17 AM (TcoRJ)
You're mad because there aren't any stories of Republicans doing the same thing.
Deal.
Posted by: Good Lt at February 21, 2007 01:11 AM (D0TMh)
I mentioned before that I think we are heading for a civil war.
I see merit in using the terms 'libtard' and 'leftard' lately, because they do seem to describe a condition apart from what I hear from rational 'progressives'. I dislike the term 'progressive' as a political label, because it is debased from it's origional sense by being substituted for 'liberal'. Alas, 'liberal' lost its true meaning when it became politicized to substitute for the term 'socialist'.
In any case, allowing the term 'progressive' to describe the rational socialists, I can say that they are well meaning, and actually fairly tolerant. I still think they are mistaken in their methods.
The 'TARDS' are the ones who will be the footsoldiers of the far left social fascists. If you don't know who I'm talking about, look at who is leading the Dems. Look at who is pumping money into their political machine. Look at who is polluting the universities with propoganda, and anti-American biases. And these 'social fascists' want the turmoil. They want the artificially pumped up grievamce groups to organize thier forces around. Brown shirts in tie dye! Propaganda ministers in sweaters!
Of course, it's all suppossed to be our fault for provoking them ...
The common ground that Rooster, Jeff, and Carlos share will put them on the same side when that happens. They are patriots first. I don't really know what John Ryan is, but maybe he can tell us. Civil is a waste of perfectly good oxygen, and if he had a heart attack and died it would slow the progress of alleged global warming when his body finally cooled. It would be the first allegedly useful contribution I've seen from him.
That 'civil war' thing is sonmething to think about. Anyone got any good references on the last one we had? Check out how divided we were then ... and compare it to now. If you don't feel a slight chill, I don't think your paying good attention. No offense.
Another American civil war would be a horror, and like nuclear war, it is something that any decent American should find repelling. Like having to cut of your own arm without anesthetics. An ugly thing, to be avoided if possible. But such amputations have been performed. If I recall a man in a climbing accident had to cut his arm off when it was pinned, and he became trapped.
Do we have the force of will to prevail when the 'Tards' are finally mobilized by thier handlers? If that limb is going to kill us, can we cut it off? It's going to hurt either way. The war related toll from the previous American civil war was not that short of a million, if you add in all the civilians, and 'chickenhawks' who died as a result! How many will the 'tards' require us to sacrifice?
And they will have help from the jihadists. Natch!
Sleep tight ...
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 21, 2007 03:52 AM (2OHpj)
Speaking of which, time to bitch-slap Jeff and the KKK wizard:
" Attacking three people because they don't buy into the chicken hawk canard is neither tolerant nor progressive."
If you noticed, shit-wit...I didn't even comment on the article. I just wanted to post about how stupid you are. I succeeded.
"Quit posing as a moderate, you moonbat troll."
Quit jacking off to "24", you wannabe wing-nut.
Lt: "Liberals are violent and intolerant of dissenting viewpoints."
Come on, it's left and right. Both sides take blame. Shit, I can't even count how many times Maximus threatened to kill me last year...hahaha.
Gayrooster: "Osamabinkissinguptocarlos: Suck ass punk!"
Oh, I get it. That's all you can come up with after I make you look like a fucking idiot for calling Carlos a lib.
"Why doesn't one of my sons get lucky and run across one of these liberal assholes that wants to fight?"
Send your white trash pussy-ass son. I bet he's your brother too. Oink! Oh, and don't try to impress me with how tough you think he is. Just because he serves mash potatoes for Haliburton doesn't make him a man, you KKK bitch.
Java: "Pretty much, you either agree with the hard line or you should not have the same rights"
Same as I said above. I think left and right are identical on this.
Posted by: osamabinthere at February 21, 2007 04:16 AM (ZxuJ4)
As far as white trash. We can and have brought punks like you for years.
Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 05:58 AM (smCdV)
Posted by: templar knight at February 21, 2007 10:46 AM (LFjVi)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 11:37 AM (smCdV)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 02:13 PM (smCdV)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 02:14 PM (smCdV)
You're such a little pussy. You can't get it up, so you come in here to spout your drunk bullshit. You're so delusional, you've even accused me of being other races as well as saying I'm a disgrace to the white race. You are the bitch, old man. Moaning and moaning. Better to shoot an old pig like yourself. You're not even a conservative. You're a wasteful old bigot waiting to be ass raped by reality. Also: better walk the walk, pussy. If you suggest I be shot, you better follow up so you can fail and give me justification to snuff you out myself. I know you won't though. Jeff Buttholz won't unchain you from his bed post.
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 21, 2007 03:12 PM (ZxuJ4)
rooster,
I'm aware of differences in people, and I have no illusions about human nature, i.e., I see the world as it actually is, not how I wish it were. That alone makes me a conservative. I just don't think race is an issue when it comes to those differences. It's other factors. Religion, culture, socio-economic. Your racism is an emotional response, not a rational one. Such blind emotions are the way of the Leftard. Let it go.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 21, 2007 06:07 PM (8e/V4)
Naw! I'm right. you're wrong. Like I said I hope a member of your family never breaks down in the areas I mentioned. Shame to find out the hard way. But if you must find out the hard way. Come on over some time and let me drop you off in the 9th ward of New Orleans some night. See what happens. We will stay back a block and try to shoot the bastards when they attack you. But in Nawlins welfare and fema checks are used to by guns. So it may be a hell of a fight. Amazing how poor downtrodden blacks can afford $2500.00 automatics.
Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 07:57 PM (MMhDt)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 08:00 PM (MMhDt)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 08:09 PM (MMhDt)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 21, 2007 09:28 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 22, 2007 12:50 AM (Dt3sl)
I have never called you a lib, or anything else for that matter. What's so hilarious? Did you miss my comment about leftards not being liberal?
Stop taking Osama seriously. Cant you see what the little troll is trying to do?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 22, 2007 12:53 AM (Dt3sl)
If the Left and "right" were equally intolerant, you would be reading about normal people attacking leftists. You aren't and they don't. Not even hatemongering goons like Ward Churchill and Cynthia Mckinney have been attacked, although they have assaulted and threatened others. Like all cowards, lefties like them only attack people when they think there will be no repercussions.
As always, you're lying through your cum-stained teeth. You're trying--and failing miserably--to deny the overweening intolerance of the fascistic left.
Three normal people were assaulted by a leftard, and what did they do? They showed the restraint you moonbat asswipes lack. They held him for the police to take care of, instead of giving him the beating he so desperately deserved. So much for the intolerance of "right-wingers."
Who's the fucking idiot?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 22, 2007 01:14 AM (Dt3sl)
It's been coming. We got a repreive when anti-gun gore lost the election. We got an extension when the arab-islamic sh*t for brains attacked NYC and DC, and made us feel all warm and fuzzy about each other. The meter on both of those conditions is running out. There are enough motivated factions in this country right now to acheive the level of violence that is consistent with violent social change, or revolution. We need another reprieve.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 22, 2007 08:50 AM (2OHpj)
have been beaten to death and dumped in a lake several counties away. I
guess all the do-goodie church boys really are useless.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 22, 2007 09:15 AM (eGb9y)
Yeah, so you a big pussy. Fat ass. Still conflicted over what race I am, judging from your other posts. Flip flopper.
Buttholz: "I have never called you a lib, or anything else for that matter." Really, then who did? Do you think he is imagining things? Cornhole muncher. Oh, and do you own a dictionary, you moron? "fascistic left" is a complete oxymoron. Look it up after you swallow Gayrooster's load. "Who's the fucking idiot?" You.
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 22, 2007 03:15 PM (ZxuJ4)
"fascistic left" is a complete oxymoron."
So why are you posing as a leftard, you islamopithecine piece of shit?
Little muhammad was fucked by monkeys and sucked pig dicks.
What are you going to do about that, you miserable little coward? Are you going to cry some more, or commit suicide. Bitch.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 23, 2007 02:32 AM (Dt3sl)
"Little muhammad was fucked by monkeys and sucked pig dicks."
Maybe, wouldn't know. I don't visit child porn sites like you do.
"What are you going to do about that, you miserable little coward?"
Duh. Nothing. Was that supposed to offend me? I don't follow any organized religion. Oh yeah, and "bitch" in bold lettering doesn't floor me either. Pretty much anything you or Gayrooster say just deflects back upon yourselves.
Posted by: osamabinthere at February 23, 2007 04:53 AM (ZxuJ4)
Posted by: osamabinthere at February 23, 2007 04:54 AM (ZxuJ4)
Osamabinwebster,
words are not completely defined by dictionaries. Consider the word "bad" when used as a positive description. Consider the word "gay" from a hundred years ago, and how it is used today. If someone makes the link between 'socialism' practiced through a fascist agency, and socialism that merely results in 'fascist' behavior, this is a legitimate usage of words FOR COMMUNICATING AN IDEA. So lay off. Your dictionary doesn't cut the mustard when coping with the complexities of human social arrangements, or in communicating any really complex concepts.
Besides which, he who writes the dictionary DOES control the definitions applied. Webster origional dictionary relied heavily on Webster's opinions, and interpretations, and his interpretations became the standard. In short, he told people what to think, and they did. For the purposes of defining a kind of behavior, there is such a thing as 'leftist fascisim' and your dictionary is in denial. The fact that the definition uses 'right wing' as a limit on fascism is a failure of the part of the dictionary to withstand the test of reality.
If you want, I can get tougher here .... I have plenty of ammunition, and the left provided it for me ...
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 23, 2007 11:50 AM (2OHpj)
Hahaha... I use the Oxford dictionary. Either way, I think it is absolutely accurate:
"an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. • (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice. The term Fascism was first used of the totalitarian right-wing nationalist regime of Mussolini in Italy (1922–43), and the regimes of the Nazis in Germany and Franco in Spain were also fascist. Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethnic group, a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, and a strong demagogic approach."
That stated, do you still REALLY believe that Jeff used this word to accurately describe ME? Come on, "right wing" aside: If anyone is intolerant, it's Jeff and Rooster. They are the epitome of intolerance. Even if you and I can't agree on something, we can be gentlemen and agree to disagree respectfully. I have yet to see either of those guys display a shred of respect for anyone with a viewpoint differing from their own.
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 23, 2007 01:52 PM (JVqe0)
Well they have disagreed with me, and it's been polite, so I think it is selective. If you sound "liberal" you must be attacked. I have my own version of the same impulse, so I kind of understand it.
AS FOR FASCISM, I had that arguement years ago with others. One of them decided that Superman was a fascist because he used his powers to impose a result on others, and because nobody could stop him. So fascism is at least somewhat a subjective perception. I have held that the 'definition' of fascism excuses the fascist behavior of the left by failing to include it in an accurate way. I stand by that.
Do you have any fascist tendencies? The left calls anyone who is a patriot and in favor of protecting our soverignty, a fascist. This actually makes fascism seem attractive to me, because if fascism means you want what is best for your country, then I'm there !!!! I don't really accept that definition though, so the left can suck mine.
Basically, when you enlarge government, and use it to enforce social changes by the implied or actual threat of force, you are working in a manner consistent with historical fascism. Socialism does this.
We can define ourselves, but others have a right to interpret our behavior based on our words and actions. When you do things that fit certain criteria, they will describe you by the labels they associate with those things. So ... by long extension ... if you lean left, your a socialist, and if your a socialist, you are at least capable of fascism. I'm not going to support Jeff's claim your a fascist. I do support the concept of 'leftist fascism'. I hope that helps.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 23, 2007 03:47 PM (2OHpj)
Anyway, that thing about Superman is hilarious. If I am "Fascist" about anything it's about my intolerance of assholes. Other than that, I think I have a pretty open mind. Otherwise, I would have whole-sale rejected anything you've sent my way, no? I'm also not a fan of communism and socialism, yet I do think capitalism could be improved upon.
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 23, 2007 07:27 PM (JVqe0)
Fascists are right-wingers! Bwah, ha, hah!
Fucking idiot. How long do you think you can play Mike before he catches on?
Fascist right-wingers! Hee Hee! I always get a kick out of that level of sheer stupidity. Hitler and Mussollini! Har, har! Stalin and Mao! Yuk, yuk! Pol pot! HEEyah!
You couldn't possibly be any stupider no matter how many times you swallow a mouthful of AIDS sperm.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 23, 2007 10:04 PM (Dt3sl)
"You couldn't possibly be any stupider no matter how many times you swallow a mouthful of AIDS sperm."
I think you meant to type "I" instead of "you". Give up, troll. Your days are numbered.
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 24, 2007 12:08 AM (JVqe0)
34 queries taking 0.0756 seconds, 194 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









