October 10, 2006

Why I will Vote Democrat or Not Vote

I have decided to vote a straight Democratic ticket. Why? Because if I do, I will be sending a message to Republicans. That message is that I want Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) as Speaker of the House.

Nancy Pelosi would be a much better Speaker of the House than that scoundrel Dennis Hastert (R-IL).

Here is what you will get if you vote, like me, for Democrats this fall.

nancy.pelosi.jpg

Nancy Pellosi is a member of the House who represents San Francisco, California. As a representative of that fair city, Speaker Pelosi would be much less tolerant of gay sexual deviants. Much less so than the current Speaker from the Illinois corn belt. Here is Nancy Pelosi's American Conservative Union score.

2005 = 0
Life = 3

That's right, Nancy Pelosi scores a whopping ZERO score on the ACU scale. That's out of a possible score of 100. Oh, Dennis Hastert scored 100 in 1995. He has a lifetime score of 93.

How does she score on the National Journal's Liberal Score? These are different than the ACU's score. The rankings measure how liberal she is compared to other Congressman. In other words, a "90" means she is "more liberal than 90% of other Congresspeople" on that issue.

Composite (overall) 2005 = 90
Liberal on Social Policy 2005 = 96
Liberal on Foreign Policy 2005 = 82
Liberal on Economic Policy 2005 = 91

I, for one, welcome our new Democrat overlord!

Now, if you're a libertarian, like me, you'll also be happy to know that the new Speaker of the House scores a whopping 10% on the Liberty Index's support for economic liberty in 2005 scale.

The ACLU gives her a 100% score in 2004 & 2005. A victory for the GWOT!

The radical abortion rights advocacy group NARAL gave her a score of 100% from 2000 - 2003. National Right to Life 2000-2003, 2005. 0 every year. 2004, 13%. Pro-lifers, stay home!

The liberal advocacy group Americans for Democratic Action gave her a score of 95% in 2005. 100% from 2000 - 2004.

The U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation gave her a score of 64% in 2005. Jews, vote for Pelosi!

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce.....33%. Business owners, vote Democratic!

National Taxpayers Union gives her a 17% in 2004. The best way to lower taxes and fight for small government---the Democratic Party.

Family Research Council 0. That's right, zero. EVANGELICALS, DON'T VOTE.

League of Private Property Voters 2000 - 2004, zero. Every year.

And what better way for immigration reform advocates to send a message to the sole institution--the Republican House-- that stood in the way of President Bush, the entire Democratic Party, and a few Republicans in the Senate who favored granting amnesty to illegal aliens then electing Nancy Pelosi?

U.S. Border Control gives her a 0 score for both 2004 & 2005.

Nanci Pelosi as Speaker of the House. What could possibly go wrong?

Posted by: Rusty at 09:58 AM | Comments (32) | Add Comment
Post contains 496 words, total size 3 kb.

1 And dont think for a minute that if the Dems get control, that there will be any relinquishing of it in just two years.

Posted by: HadaAbeche at October 10, 2006 10:02 AM (FJRB8)

2 Great, and I just read there is a bill being introduced to repeal the 22nd Amendment.  You know, the one limiting presidents to ONLY two terms. W will be ineligible if it passes, but the dark overlord Hillary will love having the ability to rule for more than 8 years.  Gonna go polish my ammo and dig in.

Posted by: Sapper Chris at October 10, 2006 11:07 AM (ZEIBc)

3 Ha - funny.

Posted by: Editor at October 10, 2006 11:08 AM (adpJH)

4 As a representative of that fair city, Speaker Pelosi would
be much less tolerant of gay sexual deviants.


Nonsense.  The only difference is that Dems would rush to the gay deviant's defense if he were a Democrat.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 10, 2006 11:23 AM (8e/V4)

5 If Pelosi runs the show, maybe Bush might have to - gasp! - actually start doing his job and vetoing bills.

Posted by: wooga at October 10, 2006 11:38 AM (tAB8A)

6 These are the times that try men's souls.

Posted by: jane at October 10, 2006 11:54 AM (L5LRS)

7 Make sure to imbibe Frank J's take.

Truly terrifying.

Posted by: Good Lt at October 10, 2006 12:09 PM (D0TMh)

8 Republicans  aren't   the question; but even if they were,  Democrats are most definitely  NOT   THE   ANSWER.

Posted by: n.a. palm at October 10, 2006 12:44 PM (fXz1b)

9 Good Lt. Very funny stuff!!
 
So you guys are gonna have Pelosi as the speaker next month and Hillary as the President in two years. Great!! Two PMS Vicious Cunting Sows running the show. You guys are totally f&%$ed now!! The Carpet Munching States of Islamica. Heterosexuals will be banned from marriage, NAMBLA will run the Boy Scouts, parts of the country will have seperated into Islamic states run by CAIR, California, Texas, Arizona and New Mexico will be part of Mexico again and the ACLU will replace the Supreme Court. That is, if North Korea can't get's shit together and properly test a nuke. C'mon George, do us all a favor and press the red button now and Rock the Casbah!! 

Posted by: Big White Infidel at October 10, 2006 12:59 PM (T1CVr)

10 So, what would happen if we all voted Democrat, then took Mexico and herded all the Mexicans north?
(...and I'm not even drunk...)


Posted by: Bob Crawford at October 10, 2006 01:13 PM (/UAJE)

11 Rusty,
Don't fret. The hackable Diebold machines will deliver the election to the RePageLickin's.

Posted by: Greg at October 10, 2006 02:14 PM (/+dAV)

12 Know your enemy.

Michael Rivero is interviewed by Lenny Charles of the INN World report.

I like him, although he should shave off that mustache.

http://www.thelastoutpost.com/Portals/_TheLastOutpost/Video/mediaplayer/Michael-Rivero.wmv

Posted by: Greg at October 10, 2006 02:36 PM (/+dAV)

13

What's up with your buddy Lauro Chavez, Greg? Haven't heard you mention him lately, did you two have a falling out?


Posted by: jesusland joe at October 10, 2006 02:54 PM (rUyw4)

14 Oh, yeah, welcome back, Rusty. Great post!

Posted by: jesusland joe at October 10, 2006 02:54 PM (rUyw4)

15 JJ,
I heard at the water cooler that he ran off with your old lady.
Something about your dick being so small, you can fuck a Cheerio.

Posted by: Greg at October 10, 2006 03:53 PM (/+dAV)

16 Well, I don't know how much more tolerant you can get than Hastert. And of course being gay and sexually deviant are inextricably linked, as we all know.

Posted by: Gleep! at October 10, 2006 04:03 PM (UHKaK)

17 TY for that, Rusty. 

Posted by: RepJ at October 10, 2006 08:55 PM (XlkAj)

18 You see. I've always said you were nothing but a democrat in disguise.

Posted by: Greyrooster at October 10, 2006 09:46 PM (xJ3Xm)

19 greggy - did someone hit a nerve? You ambulating piece of shit!
 
Keep dancing and flinging monkey. Jessee MacBeth still loves you!

Posted by: Max Power at October 10, 2006 11:02 PM (aMi4b)

20 Greg's feeling kind of low. All his conspiracy theories are being proven to be the bullshit that they are. And all his friends have abandoned him. Where's Jesse and Lauro when you need them, Greg?

Posted by: jesusland joe at October 11, 2006 09:31 AM (rUyw4)

21 Pelosi as speaker? Where's the puking smiley when you need one?

Posted by: David R. Block at October 11, 2006 12:57 PM (HPQz7)

22 Remember the Jack Abramoff emails which demonstrated how top-level Republican insiders really feel about their evangelical base? Remember when Abramoff referred to co-conspirator Ralph Reed as "crazy, like other folks in the Christian Coalition"?

You'd think that these revelations would've clued in the Jesus voters.

You'd think that they would understand by now that well-paid advisors brief W on which insider terms to use in order to thrill the hearts of fundamentalists. You'd think that they would notice that "their" president rarely attends religious services. Recent books have portrayed GWB as a foul-mouthed and ill-tempered bundle of resentment, likelier to say "motherfucker" than "maranatha," likelier to raise the finger than to bend the knee.

Howard Dean described an incident that occurred during a meeting with Bush, when both men were governors. When forced to take a call from a Christian Coalition representative, W stomped off muttering "I hate these people."

Alas, most evangelicals still cling to their hallucinations of Republican piety. Maybe this revelation by Tucker Carlson -- no liberal, he -- will finally awaken the entranced:

CARLSON: It goes deeper than that though. The deep truth is that the elites in the Republican Party have pure contempt for the evangelicals who put their party in power. Everybody in...

MATTHEWS: How do you know that? How do you know that?

CARLSON: Because I know them. Because I grew up with them. Because I live with them. They live on my street. Because I live in Washington, and I know that everybody in our world has contempt for the evangelicals. And the evangelicals know that, and they're beginning to learn that their own leaders sort of look askance at them and don't share their values.

MATTHEWS: So this gay marriage issue and other issues related to the gay lifestyle are simply tools to get elected?

CARLSON: That's exactly right. It's pandering to the base in the most cynical way, and the base is beginning to figure it out.

Posted by: Greg at October 11, 2006 01:51 PM (/+dAV)

23 greg - is that the best you can come up with?
 
Seriously?

Posted by: Max Power at October 11, 2006 06:53 PM (aMi4b)

24 It is. Seriously.

Posted by: Greyrooster at October 13, 2006 06:54 AM (xJ3Xm)

25 Amazing! The RW trolls are going ballistic over the possibility that Pelosi will be speaker.

Let the smear campaign begin. Maybe we need those swiftboaters to come in and do the job. They are professional liars, like most Repugs, currently in power.

Posted by: Puddleduck at October 13, 2006 08:18 AM (F+9W9)

26 This has to be satire. If Rusty believes this I suspect Rusty skipped far to many history classes in highschool.
Dear Puddles,
Same Same

Posted by: SDFreeman at October 16, 2006 11:56 AM (D84Qi)

27 Oh..... It's scary enough that the state lets you drive(?) but Vote!!??. Please don't

Posted by: SDFreeman at October 16, 2006 11:58 AM (D84Qi)

28 Neverseen sex webcam
http://xxxcam-1.best-free-hosting.com/

Posted by: Xcam-1 at December 22, 2006 11:17 AM (zW/Zg)

29 Naughty cam here
http://xxxcam-1.best-free-hosting.com/

Posted by: Xcam-1 at December 24, 2006 06:17 PM (ASLRs)

30 Your site wery good. http://villasincrete.net/fucker
http://villasincrete.net/fucker
3uotg
http://arachno.name/t/161818

Posted by: lover at January 21, 2007 05:36 AM (YuVtd)

31 Admin, your site the best!
http://villasincrete.net/drugs
http://villasincrete.net/drugs
w8lts
http://arachno.name/t/161818

Posted by: shop at January 22, 2007 05:58 AM (YuVtd)

32 Hi!
http://villasincrete.net/my_italy
wpaqu
http://arachno.name/t/161818

Posted by: tren at January 29, 2007 07:54 PM (YuVtd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
43kb generated in CPU 0.0122, elapsed 0.0308 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0222 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.