March 11, 2006
My favorite Q&A response was the person who complained that because George Bush cut student loan allocations by $12 billion that “my interest rates for loans will rise to 6.8%. What is your response to this?!?!â€I had the pleasure of dining with Sig94 yesterday, arranged by Cookie from The Cookshack - Gab & Grub. Go read the rest.Ms. Coulter’s reply: “That’s because there are far too many of you who really don’t belong in college.â€
Up until then I had remained silent. Now I laughed my ass off. I made sure it was a deep, sustained, bellowing guffaw. The moonbats all around me didn’t say a word. And because they are moonbats they didn't understand the implied concept of supply and demand. Priceless, simply priceless.
Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto.
Posted by: Bluto at
10:31 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Javapuke at March 11, 2006 11:06 AM (uo0A0)
There's a lot to say about his post (and believe me, I got great pleasure in reading it) and not enough room to say it here, but I will comment on one aspect he brought up that I've always found intriguing about leftist protesters in general. Aside from the fact that they so often seem disheveled and appear to have not bathed recently while displaying a very limited vocabulary, I've always been curious why, when engaging in a protest in which they expect to be taken seriously, they so often wear some of the most outrageous "outfits" imaginable. I mean really, what point is one trying to make by going out on the street with a poorly worded and misspelled sign while wearing a tutu, a bare chest sporting a grease-penciled peace sign and an Arafat style keffiyeh? Call me old-fashioned, but I can't take these people seriously.
When speaking about the front row occupants of the theatre, this line got me laughing out loud: "One guy still had the remains of a wide receiver hanging out of the side of his mouth."
Thanx, Bluto. That one was a real gem.
Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 11:13 AM (YudAC)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 11, 2006 11:20 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 11, 2006 12:04 PM (RHG+K)
Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 12:45 PM (YudAC)
To them - because life is art - and art is a performance - and "performance art" is a very successful way to get peoples attention and present your point.
Its not of course - it actually backfires bigtime and is key to their failures - but they will never acknowledge this - or even accept it as a "joke" - which is perfectly fine with me!
Many libs and the MSM do however know this - and are often embarrassed by it. Note - when the MSM covers them, they use tight narrow shots and controlled handpicked interviews to attempt to conceal this embarrassing stupidity.
Oh - how does allleged cuts in allocations affect interest rates in this case? The kid confused me - which is not surprising.
Posted by: hondo at March 11, 2006 01:18 PM (fyKFC)
Posted by: sig94 at March 11, 2006 01:32 PM (BnMdL)
Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 01:47 PM (YudAC)
What ever happened to freedom of association? Or does my money no longer count for that?
Posted by: MiB at March 12, 2006 01:13 PM (VeYWn)
34 queries taking 0.0269 seconds, 164 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
