November 10, 2006

Al Qaeda Applauds Democratic Victory

I love the argument that al Qaeda somehow supports Bush because invading Afghanistan and Iraq was exactly what they wanted. Right. And Roosevelt played right into the hands of the Japanese by responding to Pearl Harbor.

It's more than bizarro world logic, it simply overlooks the facts. I've read dozens and dozens of al Qaeda statements and they are consistent in that they want the U.S. to withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan. Not stay there!

The goal of al Qaeda in Iraq is the setting up of a Taliban-like state. In fact, most Americans are not aware that the group formerly known as the Mujahidin Shura Council, of which al Qaeda is a member, has just changed its name to "The Islamic State of Iraq." That's right, the al Qaeda umbrella organization is now calling itself a shadow government waiting for the U.S. to withdraw.

The latest communique from al Qaeda in Iraq applauds the American people for the first step in reaching their goals: voting for the Democrats. Of course, they then go on to say they will not be satisfied until they have blown up the White House.

I pray that many in the sane wing of the Democratic party who are not critical of the mission but only the failed tactics of the Bush Administration will win the day.

Oh, and Iran's ruling Mullahs also extend a laurel and a hardy handshake to what they see as the party of appeasers.

Click below for video.

al_qaeda_applauds_victory_of_democrats.jpg

Posted by: Rusty at 01:47 PM | Comments (26) | Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Well the hope of Iraq being a "shining beacon of democracy in the Mid-East" seems to be a rather distant memory.
But it proving a lot harder to get out of Baghdad than it was to get into Baghdad.

Posted by: John Ryan at November 10, 2006 03:05 PM (TcoRJ)

2 Not if your party has it's way John, they'll make the fall of Saigon look like the Teddy bears picnic.

Posted by: davec at November 10, 2006 03:12 PM (QkWqQ)

3

We can leave Iraq, and the jihadists will still attack us. Just like they did prior to 9/11. You would think John would know this, dave, but alas, he just can't do the math.


Posted by: jesusland joe at November 10, 2006 03:27 PM (8PoNP)

4 hahahahaga we won hahagaga now is time to bring the troops home oh we are going for the presidentcy in your face bitch!

Posted by: hi at November 10, 2006 03:35 PM (VrRa7)

5 sorry, was that maniacal laughter, or were you choking on cum?

Posted by: davec at November 10, 2006 03:37 PM (QkWqQ)

6 The math Joe ? The math tells me that I am in more danger from my fellow citizens than from foreign terrorists, Americans murder 15000 of their own each year. People on this blog are constantly threatening to kill all those who disagree with them. Others openly support the murder of their fellow citizens by the insurgents if they do not approve of their politics. Such as the christian peacemakers. Fear of fanatics chanting in the streets ? The Iranians have been doing that for 3 decades.
Dave the people of these United States no longer support or approve of our actions in Iraq.
The only thing that remains is to somehow redefine "victory' so that we can leave. Just as we had to do in Vietnam.

Posted by: John Ryan at November 10, 2006 04:08 PM (TcoRJ)

7 Dave the people of these United States no longer support or approve of our actions in Iraq.

Ever heard the term 'You break it, You buy it? John? I know you guys are eager for the mass killing of the Sunni's to begin, so you can further say the War in Iraq is a failure, but perhaps some perspective.
Do you think that the Republicans want the troops in Iraq forever John? or just long enough to get the Government into position that we can redeploy without mass graves being filled? Your BDS seems to inhibit your reasoning, we leave - genocide against the Sunni's first, then maybe the Kurds second will begin, the Iraqi Military obviously is not up to the job yet, to protect their citizens.
I do not support the U.S being in Iraqi a minute longer than the Iraqi Government being able to survive without the U.S help.
Insurgents filled the void created by the destruction of lawful authority, the possibility is, if we pull out premature they will topple the Government, and setup shop.

Posted by: davec at November 10, 2006 04:27 PM (QkWqQ)

8 Yeah, well, John, I'm not so sure about your math. The possibility of you being randomly murdered in New York is much higher than here in Russellville, Ar., I suppose, but you are not likely to be killed by terrorists or murdered by gangsters. I was referring to massive attacks that are bound to occur here in the US when the terrorists settle in. I'm absolutely sure they will be allowed to enter the country, probably claiming they face persecution in their home countries.

I'm also quite sure the math favored those poor people in the WTC, but you see how that worked out for them, now don't you, John? 

Posted by: jesusland joe at November 10, 2006 04:40 PM (8PoNP)

9 the terrorists love democrats - the military hates democrats. seems like a win win for terrorists. i dont think anyone else wins.

Posted by: peej at November 10, 2006 04:41 PM (JkDQQ)

10 the terrorists love democrats - the military hates democrats. seems like a win win for terrorists. i dont think anyone else wins.

Posted by: peej at November 10, 2006 04:41 PM (JkDQQ)

11 John Ryan:  "The math tells me that I am in more danger from my fellow citizens than from foreign terrorists"

This statement is just plain idiotic.  There are way too many unknown variables for anyone to say what the future in this regard.

Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at November 10, 2006 05:40 PM (bF+Yg)

12 In 2003 there were 6,328,000 car accidents in the US. There were 2.9 million injuries and 42,643 people were killed in auto accidents.
I assume by your logic John of not fighting terrorism because it doesn't affect you, you'll be walking everywhere -- it's much safer, statistically speaking of course?

Posted by: davec at November 10, 2006 06:00 PM (QkWqQ)

13 I don't know why the military would hate Democrats.

It was the Democrats in congress, like John Kerry and Murtha, that fought to get protective armor for the troops and their HumVees, when the GOP was trying to cut military funding so it could fund bridges to nowhere.

Seems that the GOP has taken a ride on that bridge, now.

Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 10, 2006 06:47 PM (fMHQi)

14

John Murtha is senile, and we know what the soldiers think about Jon Cary, they showed that last week, in one of the funniest photos ever. I'm still chuckling about that.


Posted by: jesusland joe at November 10, 2006 08:48 PM (8PoNP)

15 Americans murder 15000 of their own each year.

Interesting how you can be so casual about the death toll in America just to prove a point, yet so hysterical about the death toll in Iraq (eto prove the exact opposite point).  A perfect example of how severe a mental disorder Liberalism is.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 11, 2006 12:15 AM (8e/V4)

16

hahahahahaha we lost john in your face bitch is over deal with it we are bringing the troops home hahahahahha bitch in your mom's face


Posted by: hi at November 11, 2006 01:23 AM (VrRa7)

17 This is news? Each side has been supporting the other for several years now.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 11, 2006 10:46 AM (v3I+x)

18 the democrats and armor!! hahah dont get me started!!!

Posted by: DAT at November 11, 2006 01:10 PM (jtbcH)

19 The answer is simple puddleduck. Just as John Kerry pointed out inadvertadly. They may have a lot of valor and bravery and good intentions, but they don't have a going upstairs.

Posted by: Last laugh Larry at November 11, 2006 11:26 PM (TmhhK)

20 yeah Larry, soldiers are the dumb0rz!!11!!
Except when they have a higher education that most of the civilian population on average:

so shut the fuck up moron.

Posted by: davec at November 12, 2006 12:11 AM (QkWqQ)

21 can't embed the webpage:
http://www.dod.mil/prhome/poprep2002/chapter3/c3_education.htm

Posted by: davec at November 12, 2006 12:12 AM (QkWqQ)

22 Have I mentioned lately that a good lefturd is a dead one? Shouldn't be long now...

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 12, 2006 05:18 PM (v3I+x)

23 Democrats supported Bush to invade Iraq, so they are morally responsible as well. So if they "cut and run" and we see the Islamic empire expand under the Iranian/Syrian religious state rule? do not rule out a worse scenario like nukes for Iraq via Iran...and terrorist recruitment like we have never see before...So what will happen in Afghanistan/ nobody seems to worry about the terroists there??mmm very quite, and terrosits safe haven Pakistan??? mmmm
No ..Democrats will need to tred lightly, on withdrawal , if they screw, just for political points they will be just like 1968, the parrallels are very much like Vietnam..both politically and socially-"History repeats???
Short memories 9-11? SS cole? usa embassies? bali bombing?

Posted by: chopper at November 13, 2006 04:58 AM (ZI8Gq)

24 Well done!
My homepage | Cool site

Posted by: Patrick at November 13, 2006 12:27 PM (N5Awt)

25 Good design!
My homepage | Please visit

Posted by: Candice at November 13, 2006 12:28 PM (o+0N8)

26 Great work!
http://pzdlihko.com/pxtl/txnv.html | http://fxkaccwf.com/lxpu/vkxr.html

Posted by: Frank at November 13, 2006 12:29 PM (90VbI)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
40kb generated in CPU 0.0136, elapsed 0.0353 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0271 seconds, 181 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.