August 14, 2006

Does "Diversity" Trump Truth in News Reporting?

I've noticed what appears to me to be a trend in modern news reporting. It seems that actual "details" of a news story are becoming ever more difficult to come by. "Men" and "women" are often conflated to "individuals". "Terrorists" have become "soldiers", "fighters" or "militants". Terror groups are "militant groups" or "political groups". Individuals of a given nationality are defined by their continent of origin rather than their country. Details portraying particular groups in a negative light are often simply omitted. If this keeps up, we won't need news reporters for much longer, just a few stock MAD-LIB templates. Every news story about a terror ring, for example, pretty much condenses to the following:

[INSERT CITY HERE]--Authorities have announced that one or more individuals are suspected of causing, or planning, [INSERT VAGUE EVENT DESCRIPTION]. Authorities emphasize that the suspects come from the "broad strata of society" and were not identified through the use of any profiling techniques whatsoever.

Authorities emphasize that there are no links between the suspects and any known international political group. Authorities further emphasize that this event does not constitute "terrorism". It is not known at this time whether all individuals involved in the causation or planning have been detained or questioned by authorities, but authorities are confident that all future suspects will also be found across the "broad strata of society". The authorities continue to investigate the event or events, and the details of the planning, and may have additional details to provide as the investigation develops.

In related news, a group of Asian religious leaders has expressed its confidence that the detained individuals are innocent of all charges and are the victims of an Asian 'witch-hunt' because of their ethnicity. The group has roundly and unequivocally condemned "undeserved, unjustified, unwarranted, immoral violence against blameless, innocent, moral people everywhere", but notes that, while the individuals in question are innocent, actions of this type would be "an understandable by-product of the alienation brought on by Mr. [PRESIDENT'S NAME]'s aggressive and punitive foreign policy initiatives". The group also warns of an inevitable "backlash" against individuals of Asian descent.

As of today, I'm not sure we've gone quite that far, but it wouldn't surprise me to see edits like these come back from an editor's desk:

The FBI said Monday it had no information to indicate did not believe that the three Palestinian men Asian individuals arrested with about 1,000 multiple cell phones in their van vehicle had any direct connection to known terrorist political groups.

Authorities had increased patrols on Michigan's 5-mile-long Mackinac Bridge after local prosecutors said investigators believed the men individuals were targeting photographing the span.

Local authorities didn't say what they believed the men individuals intended to do with the phones, but they noted that prepaid cell phones can be untraceable and used as detonators provide enhanced security and privacy for individuals offended by Bush's highly-controversial warrantless wiretapping program.

The FBI issued a news release Monday saying there is no "imminent threat" to the bridge linking Michigan's upper and lower peninsulas. The term 'imminent threat' is often invoked in connection with the non-existent weapons of mass destruction alleged by the White House to have been possessed by Saddam Hussein. The release also said the FBI had no information indicating did not believe that the men individuals, Palestinian Asian-Americans living in Texas, had any direct links to any known terrorist political groups or to the alleged "plot" to bomb divert trans-Atlantic jetliners vehicles that was announced in London Europe last week by the government of Tony Blair, who has been described as a "staunch apologist" for Mr. Bush's "war on terror", which has often been described by military officers as a "mess" and a "quagmire", particularly in Iraq, where almost 3,000 American soldiers have died, including Casey Sheehan, whose mother, Cindy Sheehan, has, along with many others, accused Mr. Bush of "war crimes" and has camped out near his ranch on a hunger strike seeking a meeting with Mr. Bush.

Posted by: Ragnar at 05:48 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 664 words, total size 5 kb.

1 How about -

"Some people killed some other people, for reasons of their own."

Seems to cover the bases - might as well fire the journalists.


(sorry if this comes up twice, but my first attempt seems to have been lost behind the sofa)

Posted by: Mr Nobody at August 14, 2006 06:20 PM (BV7IP)

2 Does diversity trump truth?

This just in: Bear shits in woods. UN, Arab nations, condemn Israel. Democrats criticize Bush. Film at 11:00.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 14, 2006 07:01 PM (v3I+x)

3 The importance of correct nomenclature in headlines:

"Middle-eastern religious fanatic invades commercial centre: disrupts local business, vandalizes banking corporations and bird-fanciers."


vs


"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves"

Posted by: Mr Nobody at August 14, 2006 08:05 PM (BV7IP)

4 Dude, I so get this!
last week I wrote on my site a post that starts with:
I was just wondering ‘cause I often see the dictator of Saudi Arabia called a leader but hardly ever a ruler. Ya see I always taught a leader is someone who is chosen by the group to be in charge of the body politic. A ruler is not chosen but imposed from above. Hmm, I guess the people of Saudi Arabia, China, Cuba all chose their political heads. I should go back to college and speak to them about my Political Science professors. It seems that I was misinformed about certain definitions. Gee it must be me since it appears that the media use the terms interchangeably. Next time I meet a Saudi king I’ll have to remember to ask him what percentage of the vote he got in the kingdoms most recent election.
-------BUT YOU SAY IT BETTER!
CHEERS!

Posted by: massachusetts republican at August 14, 2006 08:29 PM (TiKv7)

5 >>>>Does "Diversity" Trump Truth?

Is liberalism a mental disorder?

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at August 14, 2006 08:29 PM (8e/V4)

6 On the way home NPR-ATC described Hizb,Allah militants as "internal security forces".  It could have been Lebanese police but they didn't say that.  They were in the south so I ussumed they were talking about Hisb, Allah.

Posted by: Howie at August 14, 2006 08:39 PM (D3+20)

7 assumed

Posted by: Howie at August 14, 2006 08:39 PM (D3+20)

8 Hmmm....I hate to remind you, but greyrooster has said basically this same thing, oh, about 300 times on this blog over the past 12 months.

Posted by: jesusland joe at August 14, 2006 09:18 PM (rUyw4)

9 ...bear shits in woods. UN, Arab nations condemn Israel. Democrats criticize Bush...
 
 
 
 
 
EU steps in and proposes plan for bear-friendly porta potties in woods. Then criticizes US for allowing hunters to scare the shit out of bears during yearly bear hunts.

Posted by: jesusland joe at August 14, 2006 09:23 PM (rUyw4)

10 Mass Rep. If there is a change in Saudi Arabia it will not be to a. Messing with the current Saudi government is looking a gift horse in the mouth.

Posted by: greyrooster at August 15, 2006 08:52 AM (y5dGS)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
36kb generated in CPU 0.0196, elapsed 0.0613 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0526 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.