March 30, 2007

Disputed Waterways My Ass

Can we call THIS an act of war?

A short Army press release issued on the day of the skirmish offered the following information: U.S. soldiers from the 5th Squadron 73rd Cavalry 82nd Airborne were accompanying Iraqi forces on a routine joint patrol along the border with Iran, about 75 miles east of Baghdad, when they spotted two Iranian soldiers retreating from Iraqi territory back into Iran. A moment later, U.S. and Iraqi forces came upon a third Iranian soldier on the Iraqi side of the border, who stood his ground. As U.S. and Iraqi soldiers approached the Iranian officer and began speaking with him, a platoon of Iranian soldiers appeared and moved to surround the coalition patrol, taking up positions on high ground. At that point, according to the Army's statement, the Iranian captain told the U.S. and Iraqi soldiers that if they tried to leave they would be fired on. Fearing abduction by the Iranians, U.S. troops moved to go anyway, and fighting broke out. Army officials say the Iranian troops fired first with small arms and rocket-propelled grenades, and that U.S. troops fell further back into Iraqi territory, while four Iraqi army soldiers, one interpreter and one Iraqi border guard remained in the hands of the Iranians.

Read the article. This happened September 7th. I'm assuming that would be 2006

Posted by: Vinnie at 05:49 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I'm am increasingly glad that Rumsfeld is no longer in charge.  The overriding mentality of "lets just do just barely enough, small footprint" just doesn't work.  Overwhelming force breaks the will and heart of your opponent, leading to a swifter peace.  Using the bare minimum force ultimately leads to more casualties.

If we would have spanked the Iranians last September, they would not have had the nerve to grab the Brits last week.

Posted by: wooga at March 30, 2007 07:08 PM (t9sT5)

2 Wooga,
I had the very same criticism for Rumsfeld.
But reading R.N. Admiral West's comments as to why the Brit's didn't fight back; one gets the impression that the Rumsfeld mind set may still be shared by some allies. Here's a quote from Admiral Sir West:
"..The rules are very much de-escalatory, because we don't want wars starting..."

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 30, 2007 07:20 PM (j97MF)

3 I want to tell the Admiral, with all due respect Sir Alan, the war of Islam upon other civilizations faiths countries and peoples has been going on for more than thirteen centuries already; so it's a bit late to worry about starting wars now.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 30, 2007 07:23 PM (j97MF)

4 Wooga, Vinnie,
What I don't understand is what the hell are the allies waiting for?
How much more provocation do the U.S. and Britain need?

If the allies are reluctant to effect regime change, at the very least they should do something to force the regime to release the kidnapped R.N. personnel. For instance, the allies could simply take over the largest of the Iranian islands in the Persian Gulf to be traded for the safe and unconditional return of the Brits.
I promise you diplomacy only works on someone who subscribes to it; on a bunch of fatalistic terrorist Mo-slime scum bag it's a complete waste.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 30, 2007 07:34 PM (j97MF)

5 I can't answer your question, GM, I just don't know anymore what it's going to take to push our leaders over the line.

Posted by: Vinnie at March 30, 2007 08:33 PM (BH1E/)

6 diplomacy only works on someone who subscribes to it

Exactly. "Diplomacy," as the Europeans mean it, involves "compromise."  As far as I know, the word itself does not even exist in any middle eastern language without a negative connotation (as in "compromise your integrity"). 

Add on the wildly divergent "end goals" of Iran versus the west, and european style diplomacy is doomed.

Posted by: wooga at March 30, 2007 08:34 PM (t9sT5)

7 This story was posted on the 4th rail blog many days ago. One could argue that it was up to the Iraqi troops already there to defend their own border but it seems that no one knows exactly where it is in that part. But the moment hostile enemy engages, it is time to light the mother f*ckers up.  Rums did some good work, particularly in afghanistan at least in the first part, ya know, where they turned our wolves loose and the toiletban fell in a 30 days? ramsey clark f*d that up. Shit, war is nothing but one mistake after another anyway.

Posted by: wb at March 30, 2007 09:54 PM (L3O5+)

8 Wooga,

Compromise is by definition alien to Islam since the latter by definition demands submission.



In Persian culture though there are many expressions for it

"ba ham kenar amadan"

"saazesh"

"ham-siesty"

etc etc.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 31, 2007 12:21 AM (EdIIN)

9 I'm not going to let my beloved Marine Corps kick their asses until you woosies allow them to do a complete job on the assholes. As it is, you weenies calling for blood only want a trickle. What is needed is a flood. You goodie, goodies, and you know who I mean aren't ready yet. So stay bent over for the muslims until your ready to stand up straight like men.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2007 12:35 AM (LDOOz)

10
Iranian military source quoted by al-Sharq al-Awsat as saying that decision to capture 15 British sailors in Persian Gulf was reached after diplomatic efforts to release ‘Al-Quds Force’ officers seized by American troops in Iraq failed;

Sounds like they planned to start a War, though Iran isn't scared of reprisals --After all they've killed Marines, abducted and tortured to death CIA agents, killed members of the Air Force and abducted and killed American citizens around the globe, and America just hits the snooze button.

Posted by: davec at March 31, 2007 11:14 AM (9DUEl)

11 Agreed. How long does in take the policially correct and Bush haters to get mad?

Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2007 08:43 PM (P64nD)

12 That's an easy on rooster. Everytime President Bush makes a step forward in winning, it sends them screaming off the deep end in search of a new low.

Posted by: wb at March 31, 2007 09:27 PM (0HmJb)

13 Bush needs to get hold of his nuts and save himself and the West.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 01, 2007 01:25 PM (Met7C)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
35kb generated in CPU 0.014, elapsed 0.069 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0614 seconds, 168 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.