February 26, 2007
Digg Moonbats Burying Jawa?
I've been kind of out of town for the last week or so---at least, I've been out of the blogosphere loop---so I was a bit surprised to learn from Charles Johnson that the tinfoil wearers over at Digg are busy trying to list The Jawa Report as "spam". But since we're in the company of LGF, Michelle Malkin, Robert Spencer, and Captain Ed ---I'll wear this as a badge of honor.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
(Good Lt): I put the kite flying post up at Digg. Lets see if anyone notices.
UPDATE: "Diggbats"? I like it.
UPDATEII: A screenshot just can't capture how bad the Digg que really is when you only show stories marked "buried" ("lame", "innacurate", or "spam"). Nearly all of them have something to do with Islam.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:16 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm not surprised. Conservatives welcome open debate, while Liberals wither under the challenge. I see evidence of that every day.
Posted by: dcb at February 26, 2007 04:47 PM (ETghS)
2
dcb, I've seen it going both ways, to be honest. I'm not that impressed by digg anyway. What's more alarming to me is when you check older posts in Jawa and see all the spammed links. Spammers deserve life in prison!
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 26, 2007 05:00 PM (ZxuJ4)
3
Am I missing something? What CONCEIVABLE reason could Charles or You or Michelle etc. have for giving a fat flying fuck what anyone does at digg? Do you get upset when you find out that commenters at Daly Kos don't like you? Do you still turn purple when you find out that the NAACP doesn't like Bush, or that college professors are a bunch of communists, or that Muslims aren't too fond of guys who don't mind their chicks appearing in public without first donning giant black plastic bags? Why in the F are we supposed to care what mentally retarded traitors think about us? This is a serious question---what am I missing?
Posted by: L at February 26, 2007 05:15 PM (Gvo/q)
4
I don't have the slightest clue what diggs is, nor after this do I give a flying frak. Liberals hate debate, they hate to be challenged. It's why they bum rush conservative speakers on stage and assault them. The same does not happen to Liberal speakers. So don't tell me we're all equivalent and the same. We're not. People act differently depending on their worldviews. Ideas have consequences. Liberals believe conservativism is EVIL, that's why they don't tolerate it and won't provide a platform for it. Their words. We conservatives, on the other hand, believe Leftards are STUPID, but not necessarily evil. Those are very different ways of looking at each other. They are not equivalent, and they bear different results. We are able to tolerate stupid, but stupid won't tolerate us. So no, conservatives don't stifle debate nearly as much as Leftards do.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 26, 2007 05:33 PM (ETghS)
5
When an article that provides information contrary to the 'groupthink' is put up over there, a concerterd efort is being made to silence that article, and negate it's positive affect. It is different from Kos, because it is still at least nominally, an open forum for ideas. This will change if the digbats are victorious in thier suppressive actions. This sort of sickness is why I'm against banning people pretty much anywhere. We need to be open to the voices of countrary opinions so the debate stays honest. Those who 'bury' are censors, and soft-propagandists. Simply blocking access to facts, or contrary ideas. It's wrong.
USA, all the way!
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 26, 2007 05:37 PM (2OHpj)
6
Just a bunch of lefties proving what many have been saying about them for a very long time. They are basically liars who will cheat or anything else because in their minds, the end justifies the means. I have never seen people on the right do such things because to many of us, the means is an end unto itself.
Posted by: crosspatch at February 26, 2007 06:04 PM (pxZRL)
7
Ahhhhhhhhhh
At least the kids have something to do. They could be out burning cars like their buddies.
At least the kids have something to do. They could be out burning cars like their buddies.
Posted by: RicardoVerde at February 26, 2007 06:16 PM (QrIXC)
8
"I'm not surprised. Conservatives welcome open debate, while Liberals wither under the challenge. "
Which explains why conservatives stick to catch phrases like "support the troups", and "if you're not with us, you're against us", and of course "usa all the way."
You guys aren't just delusional... you're blisteringly stupid. You fail to see even when the policies you advocate bring disaster. And you fail to see that the reason your stories float down into the muck, is becuase this is where they belong.
The funny thing is that you don't even understand the meaning of conservative vs liberal.
By their very definition, liberals are "liberal minded", they look at the facts, and base their conclusions on the best available info. Conservatives on the other hand stick to dogma.
Whateves though... believe what you want. Nobody really cares. You're prez will go down in history as the worst in you country's history, and his face will be lucky to be printed on toilet paper let alone currancy.
Which explains why conservatives stick to catch phrases like "support the troups", and "if you're not with us, you're against us", and of course "usa all the way."
You guys aren't just delusional... you're blisteringly stupid. You fail to see even when the policies you advocate bring disaster. And you fail to see that the reason your stories float down into the muck, is becuase this is where they belong.
The funny thing is that you don't even understand the meaning of conservative vs liberal.
By their very definition, liberals are "liberal minded", they look at the facts, and base their conclusions on the best available info. Conservatives on the other hand stick to dogma.
Whateves though... believe what you want. Nobody really cares. You're prez will go down in history as the worst in you country's history, and his face will be lucky to be printed on toilet paper let alone currancy.
Posted by: John at February 26, 2007 06:33 PM (qiTAx)
9
It is different from Kos, because it is still at least nominally, an open forum for ideas.
I gave up on Kos when I discovered that my comments were buried within 3 minutes of making them. They have a grading system, and if they don't like your comment it gets dissapeared. It's like I never commented at all. Just like the famous photo of Trotsky where he's in the picture one day, and then gone the next. And I was extremely respectful so as not to give them an excuse to ban me. Didn't matter, I was dissapeared. That's Leftardism. Stalinism lite.
I gave up on Kos when I discovered that my comments were buried within 3 minutes of making them. They have a grading system, and if they don't like your comment it gets dissapeared. It's like I never commented at all. Just like the famous photo of Trotsky where he's in the picture one day, and then gone the next. And I was extremely respectful so as not to give them an excuse to ban me. Didn't matter, I was dissapeared. That's Leftardism. Stalinism lite.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 26, 2007 06:50 PM (ETghS)
10
By their very definition, liberals are "liberal minded", they look
at the facts, and base their conclusions on the best available info.
Conservatives on the other hand stick to dogma.
That's your dogma, and you're sticking by it. Facts be damned.
By their very definition, liberals are "liberal minded", they look
at the facts, and base their conclusions on the best available info.
Conservatives on the other hand stick to dogma.
That's your dogma, and you're sticking by it. Facts be damned.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 26, 2007 06:50 PM (ETghS)
11
John--I have no problem "seeing" that you're a miserable worthless pile of shit not worth the salt off a troll's balls, however. Just cause you and Chairman Mao say so don't make it so, St. John the retarded traitor. And if you're so right, why are you so afraid to compete in the marketplace of ideas?
Posted by: L at February 26, 2007 06:59 PM (Gvo/q)
12
Oh sorry John---I shouldn't have used a word ("Mao") you're not familiar with, since for all you steaming liberal shitpiles history started in 2003, right? I guess a lib is what you get when history doesn't go back beyond who won last year's BET "you niggas rap" award....
Posted by: L at February 26, 2007 07:03 PM (Gvo/q)
13
John, in a normal world I'd say I agree with you. Except the world we are living in is upside down. Which doesn't really matter, because all is relative as that JOOOOO, what's his name? oh yes, Einstein taught us. And readers can choose to read whatever appeals to them without giving a rat's tail pipe about what the label says.
As far as "worst" presidents go, the winner is without a doubt Peanut Butter Brain Carter, who never misses an opportunity to just shut up and hope his debilitating senile cretinism goes unnoticed. I am all for freedom of speech, but for crying out loud, one has the right to also remain silent every now and then. Silence is golden once in a while, makes one pass for a philosopher... You know, si tacuissess.
So let the diggbat-tank do as they please, my favorite sources are bookmarked, and the admin of this site can bear witness to the fact that I check in several times a day to see what's doing.
Yes, USA all the way, and Go IDF!!!
As far as "worst" presidents go, the winner is without a doubt Peanut Butter Brain Carter, who never misses an opportunity to just shut up and hope his debilitating senile cretinism goes unnoticed. I am all for freedom of speech, but for crying out loud, one has the right to also remain silent every now and then. Silence is golden once in a while, makes one pass for a philosopher... You know, si tacuissess.
So let the diggbat-tank do as they please, my favorite sources are bookmarked, and the admin of this site can bear witness to the fact that I check in several times a day to see what's doing.
Yes, USA all the way, and Go IDF!!!
Posted by: busywwolf at February 26, 2007 08:25 PM (bplkk)
14
I'm inclined to think this is just another attempt by Mo-slimes to isolate/discredit news and views that are contrary to their Jihad aggendum. The f**kers use swarming tactics and try to Islamicize evertying, from YouTube to Wikipedia to infiltrating liberal/lefty so-called think-tanks etc etc.
Remember their prophet told them "War is deceit".
Remember their prophet told them "War is deceit".
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 26, 2007 09:44 PM (vixLB)
15
"USA, all the way!" is the sum of my political loyalty John. As an American I'd expect the same from you as well. "Gay" used to mean "happy", now it doesn't (much). "Liberal" used to mean something else to. The fact that "liberal" has lost it's origional meaning is behind the decision of former "liberals" to move on and ruin the meaning of the word "progressive". Actually, I guess you could use "progressive" because you guys progressively ruin every word you use to describe your politics. When you run out of nice sounding names to hide your passive-aggressive fascism behind, what will you do then? And USA, ALL THE WAY!!!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 26, 2007 10:18 PM (2OHpj)
16
Forget Digg. It used to be a real nice science/technology/interests article site and then the left found out how to use the 'bury' tool to further their own ends there. Now they post conspiracy theories, 'Bush Sucks', etc. articles. I left months ago and haven't bothered coming back. A waste of time. Just keep doing what you're doing.
Posted by: dmedici at February 26, 2007 11:51 PM (p6pzU)
40kb generated in CPU 0.0112, elapsed 0.0741 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0683 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.0683 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
