May 12, 2007
House Democrats are suddenly balking at the tough lobbying reforms they touted to voters last fall as a reason for putting them in charge of Congress.Where's CREW?Now that they are running things, many Democrats want to keep the big campaign donations and lavish parties that lobbyists put together for them. They're also having second thoughts about having to wait an extra year before they can become high-paid lobbyists themselves should they retire or be defeated at the polls.
Heh. Another set of campaign promises broken and appeals to the American public forgotten. Whoda thunkit?
Not to say we told you so, but we told you so.
Now to sit back and watch "the most ethical, most open, least corrupt" Congress in the history of the Universe continue to implode.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
07:19 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
Currently polls indicate right at 60% of the American Public want us out of Iraq NOW . . polls also indicate at least 40% of that 60% can't find Iraq on a world map . .
The same thing that got the Democrats elected to a minor majority will probably win them more control of the legislature and the administration in '08 . . Voter ignorance and the liberal media's guidance . . 99% of the people who want the US out of Iraq do not equate that with "Surrender" . . 99% of those people do not understand that there's no such thing as a "Limited War" . . and 99% of those people do not understand that someone must capitulate before another can dictate terms of economy, or government . .
Those are the fickle, and ignorant who elected Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Murtha, (must I go on?) and all the rest of those who daily defeat anything our troops have done in Iraq (or Afghanistan) with a step backward . . To further please a constituency who knows no more than the last sound bite they were fed by the Media. .
Posted by: large at May 12, 2007 11:03 AM (fEUSs)
Do you want the US to LOSE in Iraq?
Do you agree with surrender policy of the pussy democrats?
Who is Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, or a old hag that had about 18 too many plastic surgeries or both?
Who is Harry Reid, the Majority Leader in the Senate, or a shitbag that is using his posistion for the advancement of his own real estate ventures or both?
And finally, why does the retared public care more about Brittany "Skank" Spears and Paris "Rotten Crotch" Hilton instead of issues such as tax increases that would actually effect their daily lives?
Posted by: Rome at May 12, 2007 11:16 AM (/GrlO)
Yeah. Hey Libs, where's all the "outrage"??? No outrage? LOL. I thought so.
And this:
Poll: Congress' Approval Same As Bush
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6625294,00.html
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 12, 2007 11:49 AM (8e/V4)
IMPEACH Reid, for criminal conduct regarding illegal real estate trading.
IMPEACH Fienstein, for conflict of interest on the military appropriations committee, while her husband owned a company supplying military components through that same committee.
enough is enough
this is not "moral high ground", it's gutter sucking of the worst kind
Posted by: DemocracyRules at May 12, 2007 12:20 PM (L/SIz)
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834
Posted by: doriangrey at May 12, 2007 12:22 PM (XvkRd)
Posted by: Randman at May 12, 2007 03:22 PM (Sal3J)
I'm sure some of the Democrat-supporting (for now; ways and means, dear boy, ways and means...) Muslims would be capable of aquiring large amounts of explosives. That knowledge and capability for totally peaceful means of course; old Islamic tradition to let of several hundreds of pounds of TNT to celebrate the prophet's birthday.
Yeah, that was a cheap shot. I'm a cheap kind of guy. So drown me.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at May 12, 2007 04:47 PM (AoTop)
Posted by: n.a. palm at May 13, 2007 08:07 AM (toE0y)
Posted by: sandpiper at May 13, 2007 09:28 PM (A09bm)
Posted by: Truther Smurf at May 14, 2007 03:36 PM (HGqHt)
34 queries taking 0.0666 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.