1 Cindy got one thing right.  Notice how she criticizes the ego-driven
Left.  Spot on.  They "looooooooove" humanity-- but can't stand each
other.  Mirrors my own experience with Libtards working in the
non-profit sector back in my libtard days.  They talked a big talk about "saving the world",
but treated any old homeless guy or illegal alien who walked in the
door like garbage.  That's when I started to realize that the more people care about the "world", the less connected they are to other people around
them as individuals (and so treat them like shit).  I've seen it played
out time and time again.  It's how, by the way, you get so many "people's
revolutions" that eventually kill millions of their own people.  "Humanity" as a mass is what they love, but people as individuals they despise and will destroy them without a second thought if need be.

2

Look, the lady is a stark raving lunatic, but I admire her.

 

It takes a lot of moxie to elevate your cause, however misguided, to the levels she did.

 

I just hope that she learns in her time of reflection to quit denigrating the death of her courageous son who died for what he believed in.

 

God bless you Army Spc. Casey Sheehan and God Bless America.

3 Die bitch! I feel no sorrow for you.

4 I understand the fact that she morns her dead son.
 
I understand how this could lead her to be anti-war and anti-Bush.
 
I also understand how this could make her pro-peace, etc.
 
What I do not understand and what makes me hate this woman with a passion is how the death of her son could somehow make it OK, at least in her mind, to gladhand on camera with every anti-AMERICAN scumbag that will give her the time, i.e. Hugo Chavez.
 
She crossed the line between grieving mother, who would have my sympathy and understanding to a degree, to a fucking traitorous cunt who I wouldn't piss on if she were on fire.
 
Go back to your native country of California and die a bitter, lonely old hag you bitch.

5 Very, er ... Christian of you, Jack.

6

Which obviously stands for dumb ignorant uneducated bitch, what makes you think Jack is a Christian? Your pseudo moralist high ground is sinking in quicksand. Saint Cindy is a vile pathetic creature who exploited the death of her heroic son in a manner that would have embarrassed him to death. There is no evil greater than failing to confront evil. Saint Cindy never ever confronted evil, she like you shamelessly attempted to paint those confronting evil as evil. I dare you to look upon the face of evil that you and Saint Cindy are protecting.

 

http://www.prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_Prologue.Islam

 

All right, no more hypotheticals. I'm going to share some passages from this Constitution - from the covenant of the world’s largest and most violent organization. I have changed the names to disguise the source without altering the message. "Your leader has sent you from your homes to fight for the cause. Your leader wished to confirm the truth by his words: wipe those who disagree with us out to the last. We shall terrorize everyone who is unlike us! So smite them on their necks and every joint, and incapacitate them, for they are opposed to our doctrine and our leader. Whosoever opposes our doctrine and our leader should know that we are severe in retribution. And know that one-fifth of what you acquire as booty in war is for our great leader (the rest is for you). The use of such spoils is lawful and good."

This popular and misunderstood Constitution says: "Fight them till all opposition ends and only our doctrine rules. If you meet anyone who disagrees with us in battle, inflict on them such a defeat as would be a lesson for those who come after them, that they may be warned. Slaughter those who disagree with us wherever you find them. Lie in wait for them. They are specimens of foolishness. Punish them so that our superior dogma and leader can put them to shame. If you apprehend treachery from a people with whom we have a treaty, retaliate by breaking it off. Those who do not think like us should know that they cannot bypass our doctrine. Surely they cannot get away. Fight them until they pay a heavy tax in submission to us; how perverse are they. Our leader and his doctrine will damn them. For anyone who offends our leader or opposes our doctrine will receive a painful punishment. We will burn them alive. So prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster, that you may strike terror in the enemies of our cause!"

This Constitution is genuine, and millions follow its message. Exposing it - understanding it - might actually save you from the wrath it inspires. The covenant goes on to say: "Our great leader urged all who agree with us to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination, you will vanquish two hundred; and if there are a hundred, then you will vanquish a thousand of our enemy, for they are a people devoid of understanding. Our great leader drove your enemy back in fury. He motivated our side in battle. He made their citizens flee from their homes and he terrorized them so that you killed some and made many captive. Our great leader made you inherit their lands, homes, and wealth, and gave you a country you had not traversed before."

This sounds like a terrorist manifesto - a covenant for war and genocide. Does anything this immoral, this out-of-touch with human decency, actually exist? If it did, and if it were this blatant, you'd expect to see its followers amassing their weaponry. You'd expect them to rise up and terrorize the world. Not only would they feel it was their duty to kill, you'd expect their fallen assassins to be immortalized - hailed as martyrs and paraded down crowded streets, banners waving, tears flowing, guns blazing, with angry diatribes spewing from hate-filled faces. You'd expect them to wage war under the guise of doctrinal supremacy, wouldn't you? And if there were such people, our journalists and politicians would have ferreted them out, exposed them, and protected us. Right?

Wrong! With the exception of changing the names of the perpetrators and their victims, what you read is from the actual Constitution of an enormous, rapidly growing, extremely well funded, and horrendously violent worldwide cult. And as bad as that sounds, it gets worse in context. The manifesto proudly proclaims that unarmed civilians were annihilated by armed gangs. Men were decapitated on the orders of the dogma’s founder. Thousands of children were sold into slavery. Women were raped - the leader himself participating. Townships were plundered, businesses were looted, and productive assets were destroyed. The villains slept in their victims' beds, abusing their wives and daughters. And each bloody affair was meticulously recorded by the founder’s companions and later chronicled by the regime’s most-esteemed clerics.

It’s time to turn the page. Let’s look at what the founder’s companions had to say about their leader in his manifesto. Once again, I will change the names but nothing else. "Kill them, for he who kills them will get a great reward. Our great leader said, 'Our doctrine assigns for a person who participates in battles in our cause to be rewarded with booty if he survives, or he will be admitted into the Hall of Heroes if he is killed in the battle as a martyr. Had I not found it difficult for my followers to do without me I would have remained in army units fighting great battles and would have loved to have been martyred for the cause.'"

The regime’s founder is quoted in the doctrine’s anti-Semitic manifesto saying, "Issue orders to kill every Jew in the country." He was asked, "What is the best deed?" by one of his devotees. The dictator replied, "To believe in me and our doctrine." "What is the next best deed?" the devotee queried. "To fight on behalf of our cause," he answered. At the end of one such conflict, one of the regime’s lieutenants told his commander, "We have conquered another nation. The captives and the booty have all been collected. Now, my leader, may I take a slave girl from among the prisoners?" "Take any one you like," the warlord replied, raping one himself. Ever mindful of his duty, this regime’s leader proclaimed, "Embrace our doctrine first and then fight." Followed by, "I have been made victorious with terror!"

You have stumbled upon the Constitution of the world’s largest nation - and it’s not China or Russia. You've just heard the words of its founding father, and he’s not Lenin, Mao, or Hitler. And today, this doctrine’s adherents are doing what their founder and Constitution ordered: fighting, ravaging civilians, stealing the world’s possessions, and using them to terrorize.

Since it’s happening according to plan, shouldn't we muster the courage to expose it - to speak out against it? Or should we remain silent for fear of offending them? The answer is obvious. Or is it? What if the names I substituted were Allah, Muhammad, and Islam? What if it’s a "religion?"

This "Constitution" is the Qur'an. The "manifesto" is the Islamic Hadith. The citizens of this nation are Muslims. They're doing what they were ordered to do. They left their homes to fight infidels; they stole our planes, ravaged our economy, and slaughtered innocents in the name of Allah. They even confessed to the crime. Yet not a single national spokesperson or politician has had the courage to hold Islam accountable.
 
 
Now go try and buy yourself a new conscience, just understand that that new conscience isn’t available here.
 
 
 
 
 
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

7 Yep...uh...I never claimed to be Christian (or Muslim or any other religion for that matter). So there. And I still stand by what I said earlier.

8 Cindy got a taste of being the libtards "bitch", she had voiced her opinions about the was, they saw her as a grieving mother with a grudge against the President, and worked it to the nth degree (to the point of globe trotting her to meet fellow "freedom fighters" like Hugo).  Now that the 'tards have used her like a kleenex, she's "going home for awhile to try and be normal" (aka - were done with your sorry ass, don't call us, we'll call you).

I'm hoping, that she'll go home and see what she's done and how it impacted her family...but I wouldn't count on that happening anytime soon.