jawa.mee.nu

March 21, 2007

Leftists Supporting Our Troops

Disgraceful and puerile.

UPDATE: Interesting Rally Sign of the Day (from the above photo album):

Posted by: Good Lt. at 11:56 AM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I posted this over at Hannity...disgusting.

Posted by: mrclark at March 21, 2007 12:58 PM (teNQQ)

2 But don't dare question their loyalty.

Posted by: Randman at March 21, 2007 01:05 PM (Sal3J)

Just curious why they feel it necessary to hide their faces? What is this, AQ parade?

Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at March 21, 2007 01:25 PM (gtZwa)

4 Just curious why they feel it necessary to hide their faces?

Because they are cowards just like their terrorist heroes they are emulating.

Posted by: Randman at March 21, 2007 02:45 PM (Sal3J)

5 "terrorist they are emulating"
in the kamchatka language I would call that "IZMENA RODINE" which translates more eloquently into English as TREASON. What does US law prescribe for treason?

Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at March 21, 2007 02:56 PM (gtZwa)

6 And of course they're Leftists because they're burning an American flag. It's plain they're Republican plants, intent on using a photo op to fan a helluva lot more flames than this one. And you suckers are just the ones to bite.

Posted by: John Locke at March 21, 2007 05:03 PM (Zlbra)

7 John Locke, the odds any of those flag burners are conservatives is about the same as the odds of a Satanist getting elected to the governership of Montana. I'm not saying it's impossible, after all, we did elect a Democrat. I'm just saying that some things are so unlikely that they aren't credible. Leftist, or Muslims burning a US flag is very credible. Ain't it? USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 21, 2007 10:27 PM (2OHpj)

8 Cheney Skis in Jeans.

De do do do de da da da.
That's all I want to say to you.

Posted by: Good Lt at March 21, 2007 11:10 PM (yMbfY)

9 Nice job on the war, boys.

It's not every day when you can see the US military get their asses kicked by teenagers (it's only been the last 4 years).

Suckers!!

Posted by: Robert at March 22, 2007 10:15 AM (VTtVl)

10 Michael ... I was bored and thought a conspiracy might be fun. Seriously, these guys aren't Leftists, Rightists, Middleists, Uppists or Downists; they're assholes. The pro-war crowds got 'em too. They don't burn flags, though. They're content to shred the constitution.

Posted by: John Locke at March 22, 2007 11:04 AM (Zlbra)

11 Robet has obviously spent a considerable amount of time fighting against the insurgency in Iraq. Thank you for sharing what can only be the result of your serious and dilligent observations while in a combat zone.

Dick weed.

Posted by: SeeMonk at March 22, 2007 12:55 PM (yKwZ2)

12 Libs don't shred the constitution, they piss on it hoping the ink will run like they do from a tough fight.

Posted by: SeeMonk at March 22, 2007 12:56 PM (yKwZ2)

13 Libs don't shred the constitution, they piss on it hoping the ink will run like they do from a tough fight.

Well, conservatives like SeeMonk do shred the constitution ... though I don't know why you'd shred something you 're determined to wipe your ass with.

Posted by: John Locke at March 22, 2007 01:04 PM (Zlbra)

"Well, conservatives like SeeMonk do shred the constitution" Well I consider myself a Conservative, with a strong Libertarian streak, and I don't see the Conservative movement as trying to shred the Constitution.

I'd go as far as to say that Conservatism IS as much Constitutional fundamentalism as is Libertarianism. The Constitution isn't some kind of mutating beast (living document?) though it can be added to by way of amendments when it is deemed sufficiently necessary.

I can go on for hours about who is shredding what, especially for the benefit of readers. I have been reading a lot about judicial activism lately. There is a ton of material just there.

In any case, I'm not trying to pick a fight over what I guess was a misunderstanding.

Sorry if I missed the joke earlier, but it did look like a genuine leftard type remark, so I accepted it as such. In fact, it looked like purposeful propaganda. Anyway, since it was meant s a joke, I'll leave it go.

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 22, 2007 01:48 PM (2OHpj)

15 Yes, Michael, I wasn't being serious in any way with that statement. I lean left and abhor garbage like in that photo. Don't call yourself 'anti-war," call yourself "incapable of self-control" is my feeling toward those types, no matter how frustrated they may legitimately be.

And when I say "conservatives like XXXX," I mean "people who aren't conservatives." Their only credentials to being a conservative is that they despise their liberal bogeymen. Takes a bit more than that. That's lost on some, which is the only reason why I bring up "SeeMonk" and "conservative" in the same sentence.

Posted by: John Locke at March 22, 2007 02:05 PM (Zlbra)

16 Ive been to these protests before. Those people are the Anarchists. They always do shit like that to start fights and offend people.

Posted by: Rupert at March 22, 2007 07:52 PM (heS+8)

17 John Locke: Bite me. You wife did. Just hope your not as ugly as she is.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 22, 2007 08:43 PM (jNRRK)

18 Greyrooster-- If you're the best conservatism has to offer, the movement should worry. Tell me, when you host your lynchings, does your Band of Toothless Brothers prefer natural hemp for the rope or have they embraced the new synthetics? I'd heard the KKK was moving int o the 21st, just thought I'd get the insider's view on it.

Posted by: John Locke at March 23, 2007 09:54 AM (Zlbra)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

35kb generated in CPU 0.0157, elapsed 0.0341 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.025 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

March 21, 2007

Recent Comments