jawa.mee.nu

March 25, 2007

A Moment of Clarity

The British, with the aid of our B-52's, should be firebombing Tehran right now until the soldiers are released.

We have to stop dicking around with these savages. They're rushing to get nukes, people.

Israel responded to the kidnapping of two soldiers by the Islamic pigs with an ultimately flawed but fierce air and artillery campaign that destroyed fortifications and operational staging positions for Hezbullah forces. As least Israel did something.

The West had better get their collective sh*t together.

The Democrats, of course, voted to do nothing about any of this and to instead kneecap the troops for peanuts.

Addendum: Apologies to Garduneh Mehr. You're still cool, bud.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 10:36 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.

1 The Mullahcracy and indeed the entire d@mned Mo-slime Ummah think they
can bully, coerce, terrorize and intimidate the whole world.

They need to be taught a firm lesson; a good hard kick in the teeth.

What I'd like to know is why in the hell do British, Canadian and
Australian governments allow the Islamic Republic regime of Iran to
have embassy's/Islamic cultural centers in these countries?

While the Islamic Republic is internally fragmented, there is a very
clear common denominator to all the factions namely the manufacture and
export of terrorism. And these embassy's/Islamic cultrual centres are
merely infiltration points.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 25, 2007 12:01 PM (EdIIN)

2 Stop all Iranian oil exports via blockade. Stop all Iranian gasoline imports via same. Increase pressure until they wake up and smell the coffee. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 25, 2007 12:23 PM (2OHpj)

3 Michael Weaver,

Fuck that, teach them the only kind of lesson they know how to learn or respect. To Quote Ronald Reagan â€œthe bombing will commence in five minutesâ€.

http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

Posted by: doriangrey at March 25, 2007 01:42 PM (oMumr)

4 OT somewhat but interesting a bill has been introduced to end the US membership in the UN. (PDF)
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h1146ih.txt.pdf

Posted by: allahakchew at March 25, 2007 02:33 PM (BrndJ)

To bad it wont get any where.

http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

Posted by: doriangrey at March 25, 2007 02:41 PM (oMumr)

6 The British government has to convince its citizenry that those boats were operating correctly, legally, etc. before they jump into Iran. If not, then expect discord with a fractured internal support structure. Remember the Falklans, and how PM Thatcher operated? PM Blair, who is not as popular as he was three years ago, has to convince his people first and foremost while sending messages to Iran's leadership that if they harm one hair of a British soldier they will pay dearly. Meanwhile, the American Navy is planning its game. The Iranians are trying to provide a cover story justifying their actions; perhaps playing a hostage game for trade. If this works, then the Brits will be the losers and follow the Italians, the Spanish, etc. while leaving the US and Austrailia the major players against the Islamofacists. If this provocation is played wisely by the Western nations, we could destablize Iran or choose to attack limited targets (refineries and that nuke stuff come to mind as the top targets I would go for first) which would hurt them dearly. Our goal should be a change in government in Iran, the sooner the better.

Posted by: RJ at March 25, 2007 02:59 PM (yyxO/)

7 doriangrey, bleed thier fuel first. It won't hurt us, and it will give the dissidents inside the country some extra freedom to operate as the Iranian military gets short on fuel. I don't care if the Mullahs understand the message s much as I appreciate the additional benefits it provides to the good guys. And igf the Mullahs get the messsage, great. If they don't, I still say as I previously have, that we cab break all of thier toys, and so we might as well. I wasn't suggesting negotiation, as much as I was suggesting the easiest form of siege warfare. There is a payoff if they cave in, and thier is a payoff if we have to bomb them. So Why not? Really?
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 25, 2007 06:03 PM (2OHpj)

8 doriangrey, I wanted to nuke the Ayatollahs since thier sick 'revolution' began, but why not give Garduneh Mehr's folks a chance to man up while weakening the IslamoFascists?
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 25, 2007 06:05 PM (2OHpj)

9 I have heard that there are a great deal of unexploded mines from WWII in the straight the Iranian tankers have to go through to get to the Gulf of Oman and thereby the ocean. It would be unfortunate if Iranian tankers, and mysteriously only Iranian tankers, began to 'find' them.

Posted by: Ranba Ral at March 26, 2007 01:32 AM (VvXII)

10 No apologies needed my friend.
The terrorist dirtbags occupying my homeland need to be burnt to a crisp.
If the allies just bomb concentrations of the IRGC/Basiji which are the main prop of the regime. Iranian people themselves would tear the members of the mullahcracy limb from limb.
There won't be enough of AhamdiNezhad and Khamenei to put in body-bags.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 26, 2007 07:45 AM (j97MF)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

34kb generated in CPU 0.0171, elapsed 0.0423 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.031 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

March 25, 2007

Recent Comments