May 17, 2006
Everyone assumes that the millions of illegal immigrants living in the United States will jump at the chance to accept whatever amnesty program is offered to them. No one is asking what happens if they choose to remain in the shadow economy. But why shouldn't they?
Why should an illegal alien who has for years successfully flaunted immigration, employment, and tax laws be eager to join the new Peculiar Institution of the "Guest Worker" program? Will they be enticed by the opportunity to pay a $2000 fine and back taxes? Maybe the chance of being registered and tracked by the US government will seem attractive to them after all those years off the grid. Certainly being ordered to learn a foreign language, English, must have illegals all excited and eager to begin night classes.
Why would people who have fled the corrupt Mexican system, where la mordida rules every encounter with government officials, suddenly decide that ICE is their friend and savior? Especially since virtually the entire US government has declared that they are beyond the reach of law enforcement?
And what will we do when they, in their millions, don't come?
Cross-posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto, Stop the ACLU, and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
11:54 AM
| Comments (34)
| Add Comment
Post contains 218 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at May 17, 2006 12:01 PM (WOQ34)
So yeah, they'll take this with both hands, and pay $2K, whatever it takes.
I think the key is, secure the border, or another 12 million come. Whatever it takes. Build a wall if necessary. But we cannot have an unmonitored, uncontrolled border, not after 9-11 most especially. A long hard road to earned citizenship is the only solution for the 12 million already here (if for no other reason than millions of them have US citizens who are children...can they all stay at your house after you deport their parents?)
Posted by: jd at May 17, 2006 12:28 PM (aqTJB)
Every last illegal, that I know at least, is pursuing avenues to citizenship here, not just being a 'guest worker.' So that might be something to consider as well.
Posted by: MiB at May 17, 2006 12:49 PM (Uesws)
A couple of brushes with death might cure you of this naivetè.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 17, 2006 01:06 PM (RHG+K)
http://www.numbersusa.com/interests/amnesty_print.html
Posted by: Oyster at May 17, 2006 01:25 PM (ASk6Y)
MiB: You'll forgive me if I take your comments with a large grain of salt; you being an obvious supporter of the corrupt Mexican government and all, and having virtually no loyalty to the US...
There's another related unasked question: everyone assumes that illegals send half or more of their salaries to Mexico to support families there, but many are, in fact, building savings accounts for themselves so that they can eventually return and live the life of luxury. How large is this faction?
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 17, 2006 01:29 PM (RHG+K)
You raise a good point about the estimate of illegals could have been off in 1986, and could well be off today. It's what Rummy would call a "known unknown." But I still think legal status is the holy grail for most immigrants. There will be an initial convincing period, but the leadership of the community will do that.
As for saving for palatial residences for "themselves". WPost did a great series about El Salvador, and how many immigrants are building "palaces" for themselves back home (that cost 30 to 90K to build, a fortune down there). But I don't know how you can distinguish between Jose who saves to build his famiy a home, and Jesus who saves to build "himself" one. He gets to live in it, either way.
Unless you meant building savings accounts HERE? to live the life of luxury here? I consider that unlikely. 90K doesn't buy too much house in most of America, and you need to make a lot more to get by. When I was in Mexico last month, I heard about a lot of Americans who retire down to border areas of Mexico, because you can live like a king on 10K or 20K a year. And you can hire someone to clean your house, be your nurse, for even cheaper in Mexico than you can get illegals in America.
Of course, you are signing up to live under a capricious government corrupt beyond the worst days of Chicago...
Posted by: jd at May 17, 2006 01:42 PM (aqTJB)
The U.S. anchor baby policy guarantees that this will never change.......
At least they can't vote. And NEVER should. Let them go home to vote for Vicente (the liar) Fox, and lock the door when they leave.
Posted by: n.a. palm at May 17, 2006 01:52 PM (iO83U)
Indeed, Bush said in his addresses on Immigration Reform:
“A key part of that system [for verifying documents and work eligibility of aliens] should be a new identification card for every legal foreign worker. This card should use biometric technology, such as digital fingerprints, to make it tamper-proof.â€
The proposal launched by president Bush to deploy the National Guard at the Mexican border and to introduce sophisticated electronic devices is only part of a brilliant communication strategy. Its actual function is not to protect the border, but to direct public attention far from the true reform set in motion by the Bush Administration: biometric security.
http://www.magmareport.net/biometrics.html
Posted by: Magma Report at May 17, 2006 01:53 PM (ypMce)
If you do not think urban democrats are registering and allowing illegal's to vote think again. The last Governor's election was stolen by the dems by a 124 vote margin. How many aliens voted? The polls in King county are run and administered by the dem machine. You can walk in to a precinct and get a provisional ballot and not even be on the voting rolls. Over 50,000 were counted in King County in the 2004 election.
Posted by: Brad at May 17, 2006 02:03 PM (3OPZt)
I suggest you lead by example by posting your real name, phone number, and both your George Mason University and home addresses. I won't follow suit, but at least you won't look like such a phony hypocrite.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 17, 2006 02:06 PM (RHG+K)
Furthermore, I'm concerned that in the meantime, while congress is trying to one-up each other on who is the most compassionate to those who are here illegally in order to secure their votes when and if they become citizens (it's just disgusting to watch them), they are rushing the border in record numbers to get here and take advantage of the situation. How quickly can the National Guard get deployed to the border and get it secured? Judging by everything else the government does, nothing significant will be done for months.
Just watch these congress critters. They won't just extend this "sort-of-amnesty" to the workers and their families who are here, but their families in Mexico as well. This means spouses, children and parents. This whole deal will be handed to them on a silver platter and we can take the number of those who do "go for the deal" and multiply it by four or more.
Posted by: Oyster at May 17, 2006 02:25 PM (ASk6Y)
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 17, 2006 02:45 PM (D2g/j)
It really is all about the money. If there were decent jobs in Mexico they would have never came in the first place.
Posted by: bill at May 17, 2006 02:47 PM (7evkT)
Man, you're really reaching, aren't you? Now that you've got absolutely nothing you have to blanantly make stuff up.
You belong in the democratic party, Bluto, you'd be in good company.
Posted by: MiB at May 17, 2006 02:59 PM (Uesws)
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at May 17, 2006 03:04 PM (aH6Zf)
Posted by: Vinnie at May 17, 2006 03:55 PM (/qy9A)
Driving kills more Americans than just about anything. If you show me where islamofascists have killed Americans for blogging, I'll take it seriously.
But this immigration debate is getting interesting! I don't think they get "free health care" anymore than poor Americans do. That means, yes, if you have emergency medical needs, it's paid for. But if you injure yourself building a house in a non-OSHA worksite, you don't get anything. You don't get dental, you don't get chronic, you don't get check ups. You don't get treatment on a regular basis (there are free charity clinics, but hey, that's those damn Christians screwing everything up again!)
Illegals get very few government benefits, and it is largely determined by the state electorate. Plyler v. Doe did say their children had the right to a public school education, and while I support a massive wall if necessary, I also support educating the ones who are already here. Otherwise, we'll end up like France.
Posted by: jd at May 17, 2006 03:56 PM (aqTJB)
MiB: you think Republicans should be in favor of open borders, as you are? Are you retarded?
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 17, 2006 05:22 PM (RHG+K)
Check out the Heritage fondation web site, and subject on who uses welfare the most.
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 17, 2006 05:25 PM (D2g/j)
Yawn. You're a supposedly grown man, Bluto, act your age. Name calling is the last refuge of a man with no argument.
Posted by: MiB at May 17, 2006 05:27 PM (Uesws)
The hard part is simply teaching foreign children to communicate fluently and many schools are working against us in that regard. They're mandating that the teachers be bilingual and have classes accomodating them without the bother of teaching much if any English.
That's the biggest barrier we face with the children. Parents often don't encourage them and every day they go home to a household where not a word of English is spoken. There's no motivation.
Posted by: Oyster at May 17, 2006 06:01 PM (YudAC)
Posted by: john Ryan at May 17, 2006 06:04 PM (TcoRJ)
The transition points from partial immersion to total immersion get shorter all the time. In my county, the only bilingual schools have huge waiting lists--because native parents want their kids to grow up knowing two languages, and the best way to do that is learn it before you are ten.
And if you look at anti-immigration literature from the 1870s, 1890s, 1920s...they said the same thing about Italians, about my own Jews and Yiddish, about Germans...yet all those groups lost their language in two generations. Mexicans are present in greater numbers, as ONE group. They are also bordering their mother country. They also have a large population of non-Mexican spanish speakers. For all these reasons, you are right to be more concerned about it than they were in 1870 about Yiddish. But I believe, in the end, that the force of English, in culture, in economics, in politics, will inevitably win. If you only speak Spanish, it is condemning yourself to lower salary and fewer cultural and romantic choices. In fifty years, many of the children of immigrants will have pretty poor Spanish. In seventy, their grandchildren will be true Americans--monolingual!
I went to a high school where SEVENTY languages were spoken. English kicked all the other languages' asses. It's winning world wide, it will win in Tucson and Los Angeles and even, someday, in Miami.
Posted by: jd at May 17, 2006 07:29 PM (aqTJB)
I have a concealed carry license valid in Texas and I am going armed. I will protect myself. I will protect my country. It is time to stop this invasion, and this is truly an invasion, no one can question that. It must stop. And we have the power to stop it. Now.
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 17, 2006 08:21 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Richard at May 17, 2006 11:16 PM (7KF8r)
Yet in Miami they holed up in separate communities and effectively cut themselves off from the rest of the population creating their own subculture and standards. Cops HAVE to be bilingual, teachers HAVE to be bilingual and yet, they don't apply the same standard to themselves. Their children are bilingual, but as long as the influx of immigrants exceeds the rate of true integration those neighborhoods remain cut off.
I've worked with a Mexican guy just this past couple years who has a green card. After two years he still won't speak
English, he won't even try. A word here, a word there, but that's all. I introduced him to a friend I know who teaches ESL and hooked him up with free instruction with my friend. He wouldn't show up. He's now had two DUIs as well. After two years he is still washing dishes. He works like a dog and we would gleefully upgrade him to a cook's position so he could make more money, but as long as he can't speak or read English, it won't happen. He can damn sure calculate his paycheck though and act indignant with much waving of arms as he learned one phrase, "More money!" The fact is, we don't pay him slave wages and he makes more that the other dishwashers because he works so hard. Eventually he quit and went elsewhere for work. He was back in my office last week trying to communicate that he wanted his job back. I didn't have room for him and had to tell him no. And yet I still worry about him.
Posted by: Oyster at May 18, 2006 06:15 AM (YudAC)
Nowhere on earth does a nation as rich as the USA border a nation as poor as Mexico. Nowhere. And the countries to the south of Mexico are significantly poorer. If we don't control this border, we are in for a downward wage spiral. And that's just one of many problems.
Posted by: jd at May 18, 2006 09:10 AM (aqTJB)
Posted by: isabelle at May 19, 2006 09:38 AM (1E41r)
Hiding in Mississippi. Katrina, Mexican workers everywhere. Is it going to happen here too. MUSLIMS IDIOTS, LIBERAL IDIOTS. What the hell is happening?
Illegal works steals social security card and illegally works for a few years and gets social security benefits for life. Social Security going bankrupt.
Illegal dies. Eleven kids in Mexico get Social Security from United States. Ahhhhhhh!!!!!
Our enemies are right. We are stupid.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 19, 2006 09:30 PM (AWtJU)
Start getting used to reading road signs in Spanish/English. Not long after that you will read Spanish/Arabic/English signs. Coming to a local highway near you!
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 19, 2006 10:27 PM (FCC6c)
Since you've talked at length about the Katrina victims and who's helping rebuild and who isn't, I've been listening to a lot of news reports about the rise in crime in cities which have offered refuge to many of those who fled New O and decided to stay in their new host cities. Even here in Jacksonville, our crime has risen notably and the murder rate has doubled. A lot of the churches here tried to do the right thing and offer housing and help to Katrina evacuees and I think now we're being bitten in the ass for it.
Posted by: Oyster at May 21, 2006 04:50 AM (YudAC)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 21, 2006 09:28 AM (FCC6c)
Walking the back streets of Bagdad is not as dangerous as walking the back streets of NO.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 22, 2006 07:42 PM (pSK/I)
34 queries taking 0.0695 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.