February 04, 2006
However, today we received an email from Belani Bulasin in Turkey, that applies to all of us "blasphemous Westerners." His English is better than what we've seen from most jihadist emails in the past, so one would assume that he is bright and educated.
While he's certainly entitled to his opinion of whether or not the images of Muhammad should or should not have been posted, making death threats to individuals or a civilization, or to any persons of any group of any size in between, is inappropriate and unacceptable behavior in today's world.
This applies to everyone, even those who by choice or happenstance live in a stoneage culture, and follow a violent and intolerant religion that worships someone they view as a prophet, but who is viewed by much of the world as the wellspring of terrorism.
Since Belani's message applies to the entire Western civilization, and is indicative of the intolerant, violent, hateful, and murderous religion that he follows, radical Islam, a belief that follows jihad and seeks world domination, and submission to Islam by non-radical Muslims and non-Muslims alike, we feel it very appropriate to post his email here:
Hyscience Message from Belani BulasinReaders are encouraged to voice their opinion on this matter, and to offer Belani their input and advice as to what they think about his threat, what therapy he and his fellow followers of the wellspring of world wide Islamic terrorism and Islamofascism might consider, and what you think of people that have a sand dune, stoneage, intolerant, mindset such as his.
karasahan@e-kolay.net to admin
Feb 3 (12 hours ago)From: Belani Bulasin (85.99.40.104)
Email: karasahan@e-kolay.netI'd like to let you know a Turkish saying reads as "a dog which was destined to be dead soon, urinates on a wall of a mosque! You blasphemous Westerners all are very like that dog in the saying!
Belani Bulasin
Istanbul/TURKEY
Readers are also encouraged to be very polite. Remember, Belani needs therapy, not more abuse. He was probably abused as a child, or perhaps that dog at the mosque just happens to have "special meaning" for him. We want to let him know that we consider him our friend, albeit a bit misguided.
Update: I missed this one earlier, this one from an annonymous sender:
Anonymous SenderNice man!to admin Feb 3 I had a dream last night after looking at your blog.
Severe tragedy will kill or crush you this year.
I think it will be your son killed in Iraq.
Or maybe something worst.
You will be amazed at my prediction.
This i promise you.
Keep up your attacks on muslims.
Originally posted at Hyscience
Posted by: Richard@hyscience at
08:13 AM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
Post contains 545 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 04, 2006 08:46 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Andre at February 04, 2006 08:59 AM (bQ3vG)
Posted by: Dadzilla at February 04, 2006 09:20 AM (f7f9/)
Posted by: Fred Fry at February 04, 2006 10:04 AM (HJnrm)
Posted by: Ariya at February 04, 2006 10:34 AM (uxW3N)
The only voice of reason coming out of the Muslim world I've heard on this comes from a Canadian Mulsim. He condemned the cartoons, which is his right, but balanced it with a condemnation of the violence: "The protests in the Middle East have proven that the cartoonist was right," said Tarek Fatah, a director of the Muslim Canadian Congress. "It's falling straight into that trap of being depicted as a violent people and proving the point that, yes, we are."
Posted by: Oyster at February 04, 2006 10:35 AM (YudAC)
But let us not now "expose" ourselves by continuing to fan the flames for the mere glee of it. It will only backfire on us and make us look the bad guys.
Enough. Stop it.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 04, 2006 10:47 AM (8e/V4)
I read your threatening message about dog “urinating on the side of a mosque†at Hyscience.
I’m sure you find that these images of Mohammed are offensive. No one likes to see their religion denigrated. I certainly do not like seeing Christ being pissed on in “art†(as has happened here in the U.S.). I can certainly understand protesting it (though it may be unwise as it draws attention to the blasphemy that might otherwise go unnoticed) or boycotting the persons who produced it. But, to threaten to kill the persons who produce it and to threaten to kill all of their countrymen and all Europeans and all of the West – is plainly evil. It is also pathetic. People who overreact to every perceived offence are not people who are confident of their position. They are people who are afraid the images will resonate because there is some truth to them.
In the West we do not bluster. We do not because a person who blusters and does not follow though is a person who will be ignored thereafter. In the Mideast (and apparently Turkey – despite its desires to join the West) this logical rule of society does not seem to apply. Al Qaida threatens imminent attack on the U.S. for years and does to produce – and yet you still put faith (an hope) in their pronouncements. Baghdad Bob says the Americans have not entered Baghdad and despite the American tanks in the background Arabs keep believing him until they see Saddam’s statue fall. Your threats are bluster. You and your people are no more capable of killing all of the persons posting the images of Mohammed than I am of causing and eclipse of the sun at my command. On the other hand - the West (heck, the U.S. alone if you provoke us enough) is capable of almost effortlessly doing anything we want to you middle easterners any time we want and there is nothing you can do to stop it (except perhaps beg). So understand your enemy well enough to at least create some credibility by stopping the hollow threats.
Posted by: Cruiser at February 04, 2006 11:10 AM (XLwcY)
Dear sir,
when you make death threats you only confirm what we in the West believe about you people. You are dangerous religious fanatics. In the West, we have something called free speech. That means we can say anything we want. It also means other people are also free to be offended. Being offended is your right, and speaking out in a civilized manner about it is also your right. But making death threats is not speaking out in a civilized manner. It is uncivilized and barbaric. But you people (the muslims) have already proven youselves to be primitive and barbaric on numerous occassions, so your death threats come as no surprise.
cheers
Jihadi responded as follows:
You civilized? What kind of civilization is this? Is it a Western civilization of new imperialism, military invasion, barbaric bombing upon civilians, torture, etc.? Or a civilization of environmental pollution and nuclear disaster? Or a Western civilization of consumption and obesity while starvation imposed upon the Third World nations by IMF and World Bank policies? Or the Western civilization of pornography, sex tourism, sex slaves, etc.? A Western civilization of masturbation? Or the Western civilization of blasphemy and indecency?
Islam is the only serious and complete religion in the world today in that it has, as Samuel Huntington argued in a Foreign Affairs issue in early '90s, alternatives cultural, social, economic to Western capitalism and corruption. It is certainly open to criticism but not to insulting.
PS: You'd better comment the "death threat" in the saying about the dog so as to mean awakening by blasphemy of some Muslim fools who thought there was a Western civilization! Actually I must be thankful to you for assisting such naive people to be aware of the facts about so-called Western civilization!
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 04, 2006 11:19 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Charles at February 04, 2006 11:21 AM (kiLAW)
Posted by: Oyster at February 04, 2006 01:24 PM (YudAC)
Posted by: piinthesky at February 04, 2006 01:54 PM (BJYNn)
Posted by: Nihilbilly at February 04, 2006 01:58 PM (W9H47)
No, that would be Muslim "civilization".
Posted by: Robert Crawford at February 04, 2006 02:01 PM (Gn9tM)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 04, 2006 02:13 PM (8e/V4)
http://www.vendio.com/mesg/read.html?num=28&thread=286982
or try this one;
http://www.otwa.com/community/showthread.php?t=37950
Posted by: piinthesky at February 04, 2006 02:51 PM (BJYNn)
Posted by: Dave K at February 04, 2006 03:24 PM (YaR8u)
You must not know much about Christian fundamentalism, I grew up with it as a Southern Baptist. Do you not see parallels between the two? I'll admit we don't have a theocracy in the US as many Muslim countries do but there are similiarities in their mindset. It's called "straight thinking" also known as orthodoxy. People are told what to believe and to not ask questions, it's been going on for centuries.
I don't think it's unreasonable to have a problem with that if you cherish freedom of thought and religion. I also have a problem with hypocrisy.. giant mega-churches and preacher's salaries, limos....how does any of that fit in with Jesus' teachings on the love of money?
Posted by: Nihilbilly at February 04, 2006 04:44 PM (W9H47)
difference is Lefties seek government censorship, while christian fundies use pressure groups. Given I believe in the marketplace of ideas, the latter seems entirely valid to me.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 04, 2006 05:10 PM (paKD6)
Posted by: Oyster at February 04, 2006 06:23 PM (YudAC)
Nihilbilly, let me know when Christians in America start burning buildings, issuing fatwas, and killing people in the name of religion. I'm not talking about the lone weirdo: I mean when a Christian denomination makes these things a matter of policy. THEN I'll be concerned.
Posted by: docjim505 at February 04, 2006 08:34 PM (sntNU)
-- gunjam
Posted by: gunjam at February 04, 2006 11:44 PM (2x+9Q)
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 04, 2006 11:59 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Robert Cue at February 06, 2006 12:45 PM (KUaeS)
Posted by: piinthesky at February 06, 2006 02:24 PM (BJYNn)
34 queries taking 0.0502 seconds, 180 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









