September 27, 2006

CSM Series on The Drug War

The Christian Science Monitor is running a series on “The Drug War”. In the first installment they report on the ironic massacre of US trained and financed Columbian police by US trained and financed members of the Columbian army.

Christian Science Monitor's Danna Harman: Jamundi, Colombia – Arcesio Morales Buitrago is in charge of the keys at Mi Casita. A soft-spoken man diagnosed as schizophrenic, he is the doyen of the patients at the leafy psychiatric home.

On May 22, right after the Monday afternoon bingo game, three cars skidded to a halt in front of Mi Casita. Ten men in blue jeans and police vests, and one man in a ski mask, piled out.

“Judicial police! Open up!” they shouted.

Morales, as the one responsible for the keys, scurried down the path to comply.
As he reached the green iron gate, however, Sergio Berrio, the administrator of the home, leaned out from the balcony above and screeched: “Stay back! Don’t open!”

Morales froze. That’s when the shooting started: a torrent of bullets and grenades rained down on the police from the forest above.

“The war came here,” Morales recalls incredulously, “…all the way here.”
What followed in the next 45 minutes was the massacre of one of Colombia’s best counter narcotics police units – all hand-picked and trained by the US. None survived.

This is the story of that police team killed in Jamundi four months ago – and the members of Colombia’s military that killed them. The Attorney General alleges the ambush was ordered by narcotraffickers.

The brutal attack stunned this nation, and it has prompted the US Congress to temporarily freeze funding for Plan Colombia, the $4.7-billion effort to stop the illicit drug trade. It’s the most expensive US foreign aid program outside the Middle East.

But it’s the fact that US-trained Colombian soldiers were shooting US-trained Colombian police that has shaken officials in Washington and Bogatá. And the Jamundi massacre is fueling critics who say that after almost six years, this plan to fight the drug war isn’t working – and its time for a change.

I’ve agreed to carry the series. I take a rather libertarian view. If people want to drink or smoke or snort their way into the gutter, well stupid is as stupid does.

Hat Tip: Hugo.

Posted by: Howie at 09:39 AM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 389 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Fine, stupid is as stupid does; no free needles, no treatment of any kind, no ADA protection, all crimes related to get a fix get maximum sentences, etc.  Stupid is a stupid does gives me the right to drop the drug-addled junkie at 50 ft when he wanders onto my property and becomes a threat.

Posted by: Fersboo at September 27, 2006 10:48 AM (x0fj6)

2

Yep it sure does. And didn't cost the government a cent.


Posted by: Howie at September 27, 2006 11:07 AM (YdcZ0)

3 What is truly ironic is that not only are the Colombian army and Colombian Police financed by the US but the drug trade that they are supposed to be fighting against is also financed by the US (not to mention openly like in Iran/Contra). Thankfully that beautiful country is allowing us to use them as proxies for our righteous war on ourselves for the past 40 some years with paramilitary, army, police and just plain evildoers mixing it up with peasants and farmers - woo hoo! Gracias Amigos! Just be glad you didn't elect a leftist whom we would of course have to replace with a brutal dictator.

Posted by: tbone at September 27, 2006 01:22 PM (HGqHt)

4 Fersboo, the man at my door 2 months ago at 4am was drunk, and had the wrong house.  Should I have opened the door and started shooting?

Alcohol is legal here.  Why?

Therein lies the answer.  Prohibition doesn't work.
Legalize it.  Tax it.  Regulate it.

Use the money for the good guys, not the good fellas.

Posted by: QC at September 27, 2006 02:49 PM (PX+vn)

5 Yeah, same old slacker arguement.  Did you feel threatened at 4am with a drunk at your front door?  If you did, did you cower under your covers and hope he would go away?  If you want your freakin drugs and no self control, you have to give something up.  No special treatment, no protections.

Posted by: Fersboo at September 27, 2006 03:10 PM (x0fj6)

6 Fersboo, I felt threatened.  Hard to tell what is really at your front door at 4am.  That is why I had a loaded .38 in my hand as I told him to leave and that he had the wrong house.

Calling something "same" and "old" does nothing to refute it.  However, It does expose quite a bit about what you are made of.  As do both of you posts.

Posted by: QC at September 27, 2006 04:13 PM (PX+vn)

7 Just to make clear I do feel the official Libertarian platform on this is too wide open.  It won't fly and is unreasonable.  Heavy regulation would be needed.  Prohibition is an attempt to control or regulate but actually results in the defacto absence of regulation and loss most of, if not all, control.

Posted by: Howie at September 27, 2006 09:42 PM (YdcZ0)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
33kb generated in CPU 0.0175, elapsed 0.0585 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0493 seconds, 162 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.