April 25, 2007

Counter-Leftist Bumper Sticker 2

WarLost.bmp

Posted by: Good Lt. at 12:13 PM | Comments (27) | Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I can see the headlines now .... "Nine Army Rangers Killed Saturday in War on Poverty." No, doesnt' quite work.

Posted by: B at April 25, 2007 01:33 PM (Zlbra)

2  Is that suppose to make any sense. Not that I expect that from terrorist lovers. BTW. What Rangers were killed. I didn't read that.

Posted by: Randman at April 25, 2007 01:48 PM (Sal3J)

3

Let's have a war on Fish! I'll bring the worms.


Posted by: tbone at April 25, 2007 01:55 PM (HGqHt)

4 Small time fisherman.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 25, 2007 02:07 PM (NOVbS)

5 No, Randman, the paratroopers from the 82nd were killed Saturday in Iraq in the, uh-hem, "War on Terror."

I was using what is called "irony "to counter Good Lt.'s irony of posting the "War on Poverty" bumper sticker. See where I'm going with this now?, ie people aren't getting blown up by suicide bombers int he War on Poverty, so his attempt at parallel is for shit?

Good Lord, man.

Posted by: B at April 25, 2007 02:10 PM (Zlbra)

6 B..you said Rangers first...not paratroopers. And I got it the first time...its just fucking stupid and you can't convince me you give a shit about any of our troops dying.

the, uh-hem, "War on Terror."

Sooooo....you don't think there are terrorist? Sorry...your freedom fighters.

Posted by: Randman at April 25, 2007 02:14 PM (Sal3J)

7 82nd Airborne RANGERS, you dumb fucking monkey.

And as far as giving a shit about soldiers,  we've only got your word that you do .. and I don't buy if for a minute.

Of course there are terrorists; they use terrorism as a tactic you silly shit and have for centuries. But there is no War on Terror ... just this sad face-saving excercise  going on in Iraq.


By the way, I'm a troll. In case you have been wondering.

Posted by: B at April 25, 2007 02:25 PM (Zlbra)

8 Yes, people who can actually think are called "trolls" here.


By the way, if you want to email me, send it to blowme@checkmyisp.com.

Because I'm a troll.

Posted by: B at April 25, 2007 02:37 PM (Zlbra)

9 To: B... To be a troll or not to be a troll, is that a question?

Shall I offer to defend to the death your right to be troll, for after all is not one man's troll another man's freedom fighter? (oops, getting confused here).

Posted by: DemocracyRules at April 25, 2007 02:47 PM (L/SIz)

10 In Canada, when the US (Johnson administration) first declared the 'War on Poverty', we were concerned that you guys would start bombing the slums...

Posted by: DemocracyRules at April 25, 2007 02:51 PM (L/SIz)

11 Yes, by all means, send your cards and letters to blowme@checkmyisp.com

Posted by: B at April 25, 2007 03:07 PM (Zlbra)

12 And make sure to call me a troll. when you get through. Because blowme@checkmyisp. com is really, really, really a real address.


I just can't seem to stop trolling here. I don't know what it is. I might not have a life.

Posted by: B at April 25, 2007 03:12 PM (Zlbra)

13 B,
 
Or a functional brain..............Not only are you are troll, but a treasonous terrorist sympathizing commie receptacle for cum…. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

Posted by: doriangrey at April 25, 2007 05:16 PM (XvkRd)

14 "Let's have a war on Fish! I'll bring the worms."   Just pick apart the leftard arguments on any thread, and you'll find plenty!            Don't catch over your limit            USA, all the way!
                 

Posted by: Michael Weaver at April 25, 2007 07:45 PM (2OHpj)

15 I can see the headlines now .... "Nine Army Rangers Killed Saturday in War on Poverty." No, doesnt' quite work.

Nine soldiers killed doing their duty to their country.  Works for me.  In fact, I rather like that headline.  And yet the number of casualties this country has suffered because of the war on poverty can't even be counted there are so many.  Look at the illegitimacy rates in the black community for example, and then observe the destruction it has wrought by way of crime and dropout rates.   The damage to the black community caused by Liberal "compassion" cannot even be calculated.  Social dysfunction without end.  All thanks to Liberal immorality and their so-called "war on poverty."  The poor in this country won't survive Liberalism.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 25, 2007 09:05 PM (8e/V4)

16 B: You simple minded little faggot. We know you are a troll. You spend a lot of time on your hero, Barrack HUSSEIN Jomama's blog.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 25, 2007 10:46 PM (yp+ZO)

17

I just can't seem to stop trolling here. I don't know what it is. I might not have a life.

That's it, I've got no life ...


as opposed to the rich, fast-paced existences of nobodies who write shitty commentary for some unknown blog  and rant like kids when their statements are questioned. Now that's a life.

Posted by: B at April 26, 2007 11:51 AM (Zlbra)

18 some unknown blog

Heh. Don't you wish that were true. I don't ever recall hearing about or visiting your blog, but that's because you're a nobody who writes shitty comments for some well-known blog  and rant like a kid when your Democrat mouthbreathing is illustrated.

I know Adnan Hajj wishes we weren't widely read. Go ask him why.

How many hits does your idiotic "blog" gotten today? Do you even have a blog? Do we care? We get about 16,000 visits per day as of right now.

I'm sure you got way more attention than than, having such a fulfilling online life and all...

Posted by: Good Lt at April 26, 2007 12:35 PM (yMbfY)

19

"B" (does that stand for bitch or buffoon?) is really Rosie O in disguise as someone who actually passed the fifth grade.


Posted by: Insolent Infidel at April 26, 2007 12:47 PM (A5PXC)

20 Actually, having 16,000 hits per day makes you a virtual unknown in the blogosphere, where hits of dozen times that per day makes you a player. 16,000 per day puts you in with the first 20 minutes of a typical online news outlet and about the first two hours of the better-known conservative and liberal blog sites. So yes, you are a nobody — and not even a very talented writer.

Of course I too am a nobody and have no problem with that as I don't claim otherwise.  I don't have a blog site large or small, so I can provide no numbers. As a copywriter, however, I do actually get paid for my writing — in direct opposition to most bloggers, delusional or otherwise. So that I guess is my only ”numbers.”

No, what will house you permanently in the ranks of a nobody is your attitude toward “trolls.” As far as I can tell, it’s anyone with the temerity to call your bluff and out you as the hack you are. You don’t treat blogging as an idea exchange; you treat it as your personal turf and anyone crossing it gets the damning troll label. OK, then, I’m a troll. And glad to be one. But, if it’s a big deal, I’ll be glad to no longer post on your comments.


Posted by: B at April 26, 2007 01:27 PM (Zlbra)

21 Oh, and for post #19, you've spelt "Impotent" wrong in your posting name.

Posted by: B at April 26, 2007 01:30 PM (Zlbra)

22 Actually the whole point of MPJ is nobodys.....with power......We have  a fairly small core of readers if you watch the sitemeter.  Most of the traffic is from google search.  But for a bunch of nobodys we're pretty darned effective.  As far as hits go Liberal blogs tend to be more centralized and have more hits. Conservative blogs tend to be less centralized and more niche like. 

Traffic goes way up at times and the general trend is and has always been upward here.

But the readers we have are as Rusty says, "top scientists".  We have the right readers as opposed to just readers.

Oh hang around B.  Ya got nothing better to do anyway.....

Posted by: Howie at April 26, 2007 01:40 PM (YHZAl)

23 Oh and we've been voted in the top 10 conservative blogs since I've been here.  #10 I think. Fine with us......Any higher and we'd have to behave ourselves.

Posted by: Howie at April 26, 2007 01:48 PM (YHZAl)

24 B, you ignorant twit, it's not impotent.  What's the matter, you don't recognize the word, "insolent"?  Shall I tell you to "GOOGLE IT"???  Dumbass.

Posted by: Insolent Infidel at April 26, 2007 06:14 PM (uA7FB)

25 Yes, II, I recognized the word "insolent" when I wrote my comment. Now, do you recognize the words "sarcasm" and "insult?" Google those, buffoon.

Posted by: B at April 27, 2007 09:51 AM (YTpW6)

26 Oooohhhhhhhhhh, golly gee!!!!  Pardon me, fuckface, but your inept attempt at insults/sarcasm escaped me because I'm used to seeing it written by the masters, such as Misha http://www.nicedoggie.net/2007/.  I suggest you brush up on your reading skills and take some lessons.  Until then, you are summarily dismissed.  Asswipe.

Posted by: Insolent Infidel at April 27, 2007 11:53 AM (A5PXC)

27 ... and summarily yet.

Posted by: B at April 27, 2007 08:52 PM (YTpW6)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
41kb generated in CPU 0.0317, elapsed 0.1265 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.1111 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.