May 18, 2006
Rep. John Murtha, an influential Pennsylvania lawmaker and outspoken critic of the war in Iraq, said today Marines had “killed innocent civilians in cold blood†after allegedly responding to a roadside bomb ambush that killed a Marine during a patrol in Haditha, Iraq, Nov. 19.Ignoring centuries of American jurisprudence, Murtha has hopelessly prejudiced this case with his presumption of guilt. And Murtha has done this for one reason only, political gain. Murtha's reason for prejudging this case is his claim that the alleged crime was committed due to over-extension of the military.“It’s much worse than was reported in Time magazine,†Murtha, a Democrat, former Marine colonel and Vietnam war veteran, told reporters on Capitol Hill.
“There was no firefight. There was no [bomb] that killed those innocent people,†Murtha explained, adding there were “about twice as many†Iraqis killed than Time had reported.
Regardless of the outcome of Courts Martial investigating these Marines, Jack Murtha has exposed himself as a festering puswart on the buttocks of the House of Representatives.
Jack Murtha has abused his position as a US Representative and deserves censure by the House, at the very least. Murtha's past military service does not in any way excuse this gross misconduct.
Via Stop the ACLU.
Cross-posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
12:39 PM
| Comments (85)
| Add Comment
Post contains 247 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Mike at May 18, 2006 12:49 PM (PJzqy)
So, someone explain to me how this despicable man is not cursed loudly and publicly by every retired Marine
Posted by: The Curmudgeon at May 18, 2006 01:11 PM (jeBXX)
What Murtha is bringing up is the fact that these marines are in very harsh conditions on an ill fated mission based in lies who are going nuts and committing atrocities out of madness....MAI LAI sound familiar?
See, Murtha knows blind obedience to authroity is not honorable and when your leaders come up corrupt it is vrtuous duty to fight the lies of totalitarianism.
Remember, tehse kids you sent to hell have to come home, so they can date your daughters, and like the vietnam generation, be thrown away by society.
commie
Posted by: commie at May 18, 2006 01:56 PM (1esPS)
Posted by: john Ryan at May 18, 2006 02:06 PM (TcoRJ)
Iraq and Vietnam are not the same war. Get over it.
War is war and you will have some people "going nuts" due to combat stress. But any armed conflict will induce combat stress, no matter who sent the soldiers to war, or why they're fighting it!
The soldiers who ALLEGEDLY killed innocent civilians may have been under stress, but if they had more integrity, morals, a conscience, whatever you want to call it, they wouldn't have committed such a crime.
You see it's not the DOD's or the President's fault, nor is it failed policy. It is poor judgement and lack of morals that causes a person to kill innocent people.
Deep down inside I bet liberals and Bush-haters just love it when something like this happens. All you little deranged liberals are sick hypocrites.
Posted by: Agent Meatball at May 18, 2006 02:06 PM (30FRH)
I lived under Spain's Franco dictatorship as a minor. A right wing, christian, hardcore fascist goverment (For God and Country)..,And I find funny as shit how little here in Amercia people ACTUALLY know what a facist goverment looks like...
Starting to look a lot like on in this place.
Posted by: Citizen # 255883400882 at May 18, 2006 02:37 PM (3T8kU)
Damn Comunist military!!!
You can dress a monkey in silk, but it is still a monkey.
Posted by: Citizen # 255883400882 at May 18, 2006 02:41 PM (3T8kU)
I can guarantee you personally one thing. If you ever met me in person your internet braggadoccio would disappear in a stream of urine down your leg, and you would be quite polite.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 18, 2006 02:57 PM (RHG+K)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 18, 2006 02:59 PM (RHG+K)
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil?"
Consider yourself a criminal.
Posted by: miguel at May 18, 2006 03:08 PM (FOdjt)
The men you voted to send to Iraq (remember John, you voted to send them ) probably counted on a little more from you.
How about letting the facts come out and give them their day in court. You owe them at least that much John. They can't just run away when the wind blows in a different direction. They had to stay and deal with the hand you and the other Senators and Congressmen delt them.
For you to bury these guys like this before trial or inquest makes me sick.
Posted by: Brad at May 18, 2006 03:32 PM (3OPZt)
Posted by: john Ryan at May 18, 2006 03:51 PM (TcoRJ)
nobody's against punishing marines for killing innocent civilians. I'm all in favor of it. What I find despicable is how you Libs use these occassions to tarnish our military and our country. You people are despicable, and so is Murtha. You don't give a flying fuck about human rights unless you can use it for your America hating agenda. Iraq has made that patently clear.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 18, 2006 03:55 PM (8e/V4)
What's it going to be Bluto? Support the troops, unless they contradict King George's propaganda machine (Murtha, Shinseki, the generals against Rumsfeld)?
Posted by: Jake at May 18, 2006 04:03 PM (TWAi3)
The the half-wits are on the prowl. John Ryan STFU You are an indolent little prick. Why don't you run along and watch some MTV. And as far as you assholes commie and citizen #6546546546 and any others I might have missed, STFU and please ESAD.
Posted by: jamsler at May 18, 2006 04:29 PM (VqA/E)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 18, 2006 04:34 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 18, 2006 05:01 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 18, 2006 05:29 PM (D2g/j)
"Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them. And they killed innocent civilians in cold blood. That is what the report is going to tell."
That last sentence is important.
Posted by: Juggler at May 18, 2006 06:12 PM (1I4e7)
Posted by: Homeland Security at May 18, 2006 07:14 PM (q5wwn)
Posted by: Big Treat at May 18, 2006 07:19 PM (SNkWV)
These neo-cons are awesome...What else do you expect from these retards?...Reason, knowledge. No, of couse not. Nothing but threats ang calls for hanging, shooting, expelling, shitting and spetting on anyone or anything...
Just like Franco's Falange's Youth. Ifreakingdentical. Probably a bunch of faggety neo-con geeks that have never served or face combat and probably spend their weekends playing soliders at their local militia....
Leatherneck: Yes there are. I should know. I served as a ranger in Fort Stuart (GA, for those of you neo-morons that can't read a map) back in the late 80's. I think actually the number is more like 20%.
You can dress a monkey in silk, still a stupid fucking monkey.
Posted by: Citizen # 255883400882 at May 18, 2006 07:35 PM (jZ6cC)
When I follow the money and the lies, I find you folks wishing another Bushie will put one up my backside. We will all get tired of it. Even you.
Posted by: Tom at May 18, 2006 07:37 PM (12pWd)
I used to consider myself conservative because I believe in fiscal responsibility, states rights over fed rights, smaller government and the preservation of civil liberties. Man, those days are over.
"Those who trade security for liberty will neither receive or deserve either." Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: Jake at May 18, 2006 07:38 PM (cOXGQ)
One mans meal is anothers' poison.....
Posted by: Wee Free at May 18, 2006 07:46 PM (JfWXC)
Posted by: Citizen # 255883400882 at May 18, 2006 07:49 PM (jZ6cC)
Innocent until proven guilty is a pretty simple concept, but liberals only seem to advocate it when it suits their agenda. That's been amply proven in this thread.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 18, 2006 08:26 PM (RHG+K)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 18, 2006 08:28 PM (RHG+K)
If you really were a ranger, I think you would recall the proper spelling of your duty post. It is spelled Fort STEWART, not Fort Stuart. Pretty sloppy of you not to remember the proper name of your post. Kinda makes YOU look like the neo-moron ya damned fascist.
Posted by: jaybear at May 18, 2006 08:30 PM (5gqp1)
you can dress an asshole in silk, but he'll still be full of shit
Posted by: jaybear at May 18, 2006 09:09 PM (5gqp1)
You kidding me?.. That is the best you can do? Really? This is it?. This is the depth and width of your mind?
Nah...C'mon there chief, you can do much better than that. Give it another shot. Seriously. But this time, no Truthiness. Give me some real threats, something really "neo-con-ish". you know, like the other cats in here.
You kiddo you. You are special. Yes you are. yes you are.
Hahahahaha
Posted by: Citizen # 255883400882 at May 18, 2006 09:17 PM (jZ6cC)
Posted by: Citizen # 255883400882 at May 18, 2006 09:24 PM (jZ6cC)
when did you live in Spain?
looking forward to your next round of stuttering...or is it past your bedtime?
Posted by: jaybear at May 18, 2006 09:27 PM (5gqp1)
Posted by: David at May 18, 2006 09:45 PM (uS1Ao)
Posted by: sandpiper at May 18, 2006 09:58 PM (as4nC)
Citizen,
count yourself among those who don't know what a fascist government looks like. I lived in Pinochet's Chile for 5 years, AND I spent many of my childhood summers with relatives in Franco's Spain. Top that one you silly little clown.
People like you that toss around the word 'fascism' like it was used cleanex are idiots. You insult the verey memory people who have been the real victims of fascism, including my family in Spain who at least one of them died fighting the fascists, as well as friends of my family in Chile, some of whom were tortured and exiled.
You make me want to toss my cookies when you imply things about our government that you don't have th e sligthest clue about.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 18, 2006 10:09 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 18, 2006 10:13 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 19, 2006 04:58 AM (0yYS2)
Google it for yourself, this is Imperialism at its worst, when will you stop blindly following your government?
http://www.google.ca/search?q=+pentagon+marines+Haditha
Posted by: Canadian at May 19, 2006 05:05 AM (PjK9S)
So now you're a liberal for these reasons? Those who favor big government, litigation, excessive regulation and higher taxes to pay for it all? That's how liberals define "fiscal responsibility" you know - high taxes to cover a multitude of sin. I'm confused. Because being a conservative STILL means all those things you mentioned above.
And citizenwhatever: If things are so bad here, us being such fascists you know (you forgot to throw "nazi" in there), I hear that Franco's dead and Spain is no longer fascist. It might be a good time for you to move back. Since you're so miserable here and all.
Posted by: Oyster at May 19, 2006 05:46 AM (YudAC)
Cool, a death threat on a Congressman.
I'm pretty sure that's illegal.
Posted by: Theo at May 19, 2006 07:22 AM (7AEHv)
Posted by: Howie at May 19, 2006 07:24 AM (D3+20)
Aashamed Patriot,
how bout instead you just go back to Daily Kos where you came from. Notice Kos requires people to register to post, while here morons like you can just show up and pollute threads at your leisure.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 19, 2006 08:48 AM (8e/V4)
Innocent Civilians?
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck; IT IS A DUCK.
If you are on a duck hunt monkey boy there are no innocent ducks.
Posted by: The Curmudgeon at May 19, 2006 08:50 AM (jeBXX)
No, Bush will get a statue and these marines will be defended because they were under stress, which of course normally causes people to shoot children point blank!!
But yes, go on attack Murtha for making sure the truth gets out, it was commanders in Iraq who fed him this news because they understand the stupidity of their presence there and want to bring their men home.
The longer these wars go on the more often these types of atrocities happen, on both sides. And america still has yet to accomplish anything worthwhile in Iraq.
.
Posted by: Yikes! at May 19, 2006 10:11 AM (hfa+w)
Typical Leftist pinhead.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 19, 2006 10:15 AM (RHG+K)
So your point is: Murtha should be censured for...what exactly? speaking out on a tragic incident?
OK...because the first amendment shouldn't apply to members of Congress.
Time to rethink that, methinks.
Posted by: jd at May 19, 2006 10:28 AM (aqTJB)
--Bluto
"Citizen number whatever, did Franco's thugs remove part of your brain or something, or are you just senile?"
--Bluto
"To Jake and the other halfwits..."
--Bluto
"Typical Leftist pinhead."
--Bluto
Yes, you're clearly a polite, well-spoken, and fully competent individual with a number of well-defined, defensible positions that are strongly backed by fact and impressive debate tactics.
I can't possibly imagine why anybody would ever disagree with you with such compelling and intelligent arguments presented in such an even-keeled and persuasive manner as these.
Posted by: TxMxP at May 19, 2006 11:31 AM (gOPcw)
Or did you advocate the censuring of DeLay, Gingrich, Helms, Burton....etc etc.?
Posted by: jd at May 19, 2006 11:33 AM (aqTJB)
The past bad behavior of the republicans doesn't excuse the current bad behavior of a democrat.
Murtha's comments were clearly designed in an emotional manner to create an outcry. If he'd merely stated the basic facts, that would be one thing, but he:
1. Politicized a tragedy.
2. Took on the role of Judge, Jury and Executioner before the military even had a chance to accuse and try anybody themselves.
I imagine you criticized Bush - and rightly so - when he did similar things with 9/11, Katrina, etc. Now it's time to see if you can put your money where your mouth is and prove that you really are "better" than the blind Bush devotees. Murtha screwed up, so hold him accountable even though it means weakening "your party".
Posted by: TxMxP at May 19, 2006 11:47 AM (gOPcw)
Posted by: Howie at May 19, 2006 11:57 AM (D3+20)
But then Murtha's talk is fodder for the enemy in a time of war. I wouldn't call for his censure, but I do think his motives stem from more than just patriotism or a concern for the troops. I do think he has a chip on his shoulder because his ideas were rejected by this administration. He's a proud man and now he picks his issues carefully for maximum impact, maybe too proud, and his speech about the troops "living hand to mouth" and being "broken" and "demoralized" was over the top. The vast majority of the troops denounce his assertions.
The voters will speak when it's time for his re-election. If New Jersey constituents think he speaks well for them, then so be it. I personally wouldn't vote for him.
Posted by: Oyster at May 19, 2006 12:01 PM (QQzPp)
You come hear to troll, and then you pretend outrage when you're told to fuck off. lol! Lefty orwellianism knows no bounds. Come hear with a respectful attitude to argue the issues, and you'll be treated respectfully. Otherwise kindly fuckoff.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 19, 2006 12:26 PM (8e/V4)
Uh... huh. You quoted from my very first post, saying that it was "outrage" because somebody told me to "fuck off".
How exactly does that work? I mean, how was I told to leave.... before I even got here? Are you saying that his place is full of psychics?
Ignoring the fact that your post is complete nonsense and violates the most basic principles of spacetime physics, I wonder, exactly, what "respectful" means to a guy who's entire post revolves around profanity and political slurs? Considering that your idea of "respect" apparently involves insulting and cursing at other posters without any apparent provocation, you'll have to excuse me if I dismiss your complaints that I don't act "respectful" in your opinion.
Posted by: TxMxP at May 19, 2006 12:51 PM (gOPcw)
I'll chalk your comment up as just a lame attempt to be clever so as to avoid making a comment with any real substance. I've been doing this long enough to recognize nothing when I see it.
But I'll try again. Did you get on Citizen's case for coming here and calling people "retards"? No, you ignored that but pretended offense when someone flamed him back. It's that simple. You'd have to be incredibly obtuse or retarded not to get it. It's happens all the time on this blog. Leftards come here with an attitude, and when they get attitude back that's supposed to prove what meanies rightwingers are. That's all you did. Orwell is rolling in his grave.
Come here with a respectful attitude and discuss the issues-- not how "retarded" the "neocons" are-- and you'll be treated with repect. Otherwise, kindly fuckoff.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 19, 2006 01:14 PM (8e/V4)
Yes, clearly, I just don't "get it" and you've shown me the light. Obviously, your tactic worked excellently and everybody here has benefited from the insight generated in the resulting melee.
In the meantime, as your very first post in the thread was laced with profanity that hasn't stopped since, I have little interest in what you think is "respectful". You can lecture me on respect when you gain some. Until then, feel free to stop wasting both of our time. As you might have noticed if you weren't so busy slinging about arbitrary political labels to so desperately avoid anything approaching a competent, meaningful claim, I have an interest in discussing the actual issue at hand.
Posted by: TxMxP at May 19, 2006 01:33 PM (gOPcw)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 19, 2006 01:48 PM (RHG+K)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 19, 2006 01:57 PM (8e/V4)
Perhaps you would feel better if I additionally accused you of myopia, since you chose to completely ignore the post I made dealing specifically and only with the subject at hand - a post which nobody who continually demands discussion on the topic seems to want to acknowledge exists.
I enjoy arguing with people who constantly expound about "liberals" and "leftists" in general, vague ways. They constantly sling accusations that are only valid because they choose to accept only a small portion of their reality as being real. The fact that two of you now have gleefully claimed that I haven't posted in relation to the actual topic when I've in fact made my position on Murtha's comments quite clearly known further justifies my opinion that a very large portion of what constitutes the vocal wing of the right-leaning politicos and pundits in this country are only interested in generating noise, insults, and threats, and have absolutely no interest in doing right by America in any sense of the word.
Posted by: TxMxP at May 19, 2006 01:59 PM (gOPcw)
TxMxP,
that would make your prior observation an incredibly obtuse or retarded one. Because I don't see anywhere on this thread where someone said using profanity constitutes respectful behaviour. And yet you impute it to me (or Bluto). That makes you an intellectually dishonest retard. Profanity is clearly disrespectful. That's why people use it. Which is how you'll be treated if you come here with an attitude. I think that makes it the third time I say this. And still the retard doesn't get it.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 19, 2006 02:32 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 19, 2006 02:48 PM (0yYS2)
Did you just expound on right-leaning politicos and pundits in a vague, general way? Why yes. You did.
Posted by: Oyster at May 19, 2006 03:18 PM (QQzPp)
If you insist on being coddled, I'd suggest that you visit The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler. Emperor Misha is renowned for his patience with people like you. Be sure to tell him I sent you.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at May 19, 2006 03:52 PM (RHG+K)
And I cite this board, LGF, Free Republic, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, and the entire Bush Administration as evidence to support my assertion. Feel free to cite the many pundits and blogs on the left who are equally as intellectually inferior as these groups if you'd care to assert the same about the left (though they're rarely as predisposed to violent rhetoric as the right-wingers, so at least they have that minor advantage).
>>If you insist on being coddled, I'd suggest that you visit The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler. Emperor Misha is renowned for his patience with people like you. Be sure to tell him I sent you.
In other words you have nothing intelligent to say about my comments regarding the topic, so you hope I go away so you don't have to continue to pretend you have something worthwhile to say.
Fear not. I've gotten exactly the immature and unintelligent reaction I expected, so I have no more need to try and pretend that I think you could actually participate in a reasonable discussion. My point is sufficiently proven: you have no validation for your radical opinions and no interest in obtaining any, you just want an audience that will bite on your words without actually thinking about the content. You have, effectively, provided additional evidence for the ignorance of the radical right's opinions.
So, for the time-being I'll be going and won't embarrass you any further.
Posted by: TxMxP at May 19, 2006 06:37 PM (ZNd6p)
Posted by: greyrooster at May 19, 2006 08:14 PM (AWtJU)
Ok Little Pinochetito...
Hahahaha..These idiots get trolled and STILL keep answering...
Buahahahahaha.
Awesome.
Posted by: Citizen # 255883400882 at May 19, 2006 08:33 PM (jZ6cC)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 19, 2006 08:37 PM (FCC6c)
I guess you didn't read my post. My family-- unlike yours-- ACTUALLY suffered under ACTUAL fascism-- not the "fascism" of your fevered moonbat deliriums where "Bush" is hitler and Amerikkka is "nazi." You have no real world experience with fascism because you are a fraud and a liar. Your little "Franco" story was supposed to lend you some gravitas but instead it just made you look like fradulent twit.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 20, 2006 01:35 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 20, 2006 07:49 AM (0yYS2)
That's an awful lot of words you used to say "I sure hope passerby don't read the whole thread and realize what I fool posters on this site are".
Posted by: TxMxP at May 20, 2006 11:21 AM (ZNd6p)
commie
I also find incredibly interesting the idea that we can ignore facts and replace them with terms like "moonbat". That makes a great argument.
Posted by: commie777 at May 20, 2006 01:08 PM (1esPS)
On the contrary, Leftardism is a kind of mental delusion where facts are irrelevant. That's why the term "moonbat" is factual. I don't use that term merely for people I disagree with. That term applies to Leftwingers so deluded by ideology as to be basically mentally ill. Someone who compares Franco's Spain to "Bush" and Amerikkka is mentally ill or so ignorant of the facts as to be no better than mentally ill. It goes WAY beyond mere disagreement. There's no other way to explain that kind of stupidity but mental illness. And that's why "moonbat" is factual.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 20, 2006 02:00 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: jd at May 20, 2006 02:50 PM (GZdxw)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 20, 2006 07:40 PM (0yYS2)
You're right. Since people like you have spent the last six years desperately trying to slander "the left" (where "left" is described best as "liberals, moderates, conservatives and, well, those who disagree with your personal views pretty much [which is ironic in this context since I agree that Murtha stepped well over the line]"), most of the country has realized that you have nothing to say about any actual issue, and they'll be voting in Democrats to shut you up. Granted, all this means is that the Democrats will eventually radicalize and become as silly and trite as you, but that's a few years off so I have time to transition over to embarassing them.
See, maybe when you sit down, shut your mouth, and breifly engage your brain for the first time in six years, you'll realize that slinging around random, highly general insults in lieu of stating any actual positions doesn't play well to anyone outside your tiny little radicalized group. You may have managed to figure out how to use 'blogs' (congratulations, the extreme right has managed to become as intelligent as a typical MySpace user, you must be terribly proud), but the fact that those blogs reproduce like rabbits only serves to prove that you have very large mouths and nothing more.
See, most of the country is moderate, and they have jobs, families, and social lives, so it's not that their relative lack of a voice is evidence that you have any sort of political control, it's just evidence that you have nothing worthwhile to do with your spare time.
Posted by: TxMxP at May 21, 2006 07:33 AM (ZNd6p)
You may have managed to figure out how to use 'blogs' (congratulations, the extreme right has managed to become as intelligent as a typical MySpace user, you must be terribly proud), but the fact that those blogs reproduce like rabbits only serves to prove that you have very large mouths and nothing more.
Talking to yourself, idiot? Fuck you and every other liberal moron on the planet, and your muslim masters you piece of shit. The only thing I want to do with you and your kind is to watch until you stop kicking, and considering how fast society is falling apart and the government is losing control of the country because of political greed and corruption in both parties, I won't have long to wait. There'll be war in America soon, and your kind are gutless cowards, so enjoy your privileged life of blissful stupidity while you can, because the ride will be over soon, and your muslim friends will be strapping suicide vests on you, if we don't get you first. You're screwed, but then, you picked the team you wanted to play on.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 21, 2006 08:04 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 21, 2006 09:21 AM (FCC6c)
My god, with such wit and wisdom it's no wonder that I feel so terribly overpowered by your intellectual capacities and wonderously persuasive decorum.
>>There'll be war in America soon, and your kind are gutless cowards
Typical. You know who else wants "war in America"? Osama bin Laden. What wonderful company you keep.
>>...and considering how fast society is falling apart and the government is losing control of the country because of political greed and corruption in both parties...
Oh, I absolutely agree. The difference is that I"m not a troglodyte and I believe in using the American system that our Founding Fathers (you do remember them occasionally, don't you?) gave us rather than acting like a chest-thumping, violent brigand to fix the problem.
Which of us, is a coward, by the way? The guy who came in here and started slapping you all in the face for your insolent, violent sophistry, or the guy who's sitting here lashing out with violent threats in the comfort of longterm companions? The guy who's standing by the principles of true republican democracy, or the guy who's apparently of the belief that he can threaten his terrorist ideology into other people?
You can't threaten me into radicalization, and that's the prime difference between you and I. When the towers fell, you wet your pants and started jumping at every shadow on every corner, and I, believing that the American way was perfectly capable of dealing with the threat without pandering to psychopathy, continued to think clearly and stand for what I beleived in.
I'm sorry, but which one of us is the coward here?
You're the kind of people that Oklahoma City bombings are made of. The only difference between you and "the muslims" is that at least the Muslims can say they're an invading force, whereas you're just a butcher trying to bring genocide to your own country. Good job.
Posted by: TxMxP at May 21, 2006 12:48 PM (ZNd6p)
Posted by: greyrooster at May 22, 2006 06:48 AM (J4a4p)
Last suck Larry does not roll off the tongue the same way that greydickroost does. s does not fit in with L of Last and L of Larry. The u is out of cadence also. The c might work potentially and maybe the k. But you are faced with the sandwiching effect of the " ae " sound in Last and the " ah " sound in Larry. You're simply out of your league boy! Go back to your sandbox!
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 22, 2006 12:20 PM (FCC6c)
Posted by: Fen at May 23, 2006 08:21 AM (RohNc)
Posted by: Howie at May 23, 2006 10:19 AM (D3+20)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 23, 2006 04:21 PM (FCC6c)
Posted by: greyrooster at May 23, 2006 06:21 PM (BEvWK)
commie
Posted by: commie at May 26, 2006 01:42 PM (1esPS)
34 queries taking 0.0516 seconds, 240 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.