September 10, 2006

Censor This, Clintonian Thugs

Courtesy of Tom Brokaw and NBC - the right wings maniacs that they are.

And don't forget about the Sandy Berger's theft of critical documents from the National Archives. Imagine if a Bush Admin. official had been caught doing the same thing - just look at how far out the CIA leak non-story/leftwing fantasy got before it was smashed into litte bits by the facts. But, hey - its a Democrat, so stealing, destroying and altering damaging classified information from the National Archives to whitewash the Democrats' failures in capturing Bin Laden is A-OK! If anyone asks, threaten to sue them, censor them and pull their licenses. Willie's got a 'legacy' to protect!

ht: Ann Althouse
Cross-posted at Mein Blogovault.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 12:18 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Quiz: William Jefferson Airplane Clinton was our nation's first; A. Black president.
B. Child president.
C. Sexual addict president.
D. Criminal president.
E. Traitor president.
F. Greatest president.

Answer next week.

Posted by: n.a. palm at September 10, 2006 01:53 PM (CWQzg)

2 How about:
G. None of the above.

Posted by: Rich at September 10, 2006 02:51 PM (89Rw1)

3 This is true of the clintons (but remember for all of president clintons falings) which were many..

But one one thing i cant blame him...

If i was married to hillary i would have been running around as well..

Posted by: jimgoism at September 10, 2006 06:18 PM (MPWuF)

4 I don't know about anyone else, but I wouldn't have married that to begin with. And if the person I married became that it'd be divorce time.

Posted by: Ranba Ral at September 10, 2006 11:12 PM (VvXII)

5 Rich, fuck off with your apologetics for Clinton. We get a dumbass like you every now and then, and we send them all packing after enough shit.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 11, 2006 06:16 AM (v3I+x)

6 Improbulus Maximus,
   For one genius, I didn't post in this thread. I believe you are confused. Second, in the thread I believe you're referencing (ABX Airs 'Path'...) I said: "To put it bluntly, they could have made the Clinton administration look REALLY bad with just the facts"

Where the apology is for Clinton there I have no clue. It's not good enough just to look at the words, you have to comprehend them too.

So, learn to read and stop with the ad hominem (since this word is is not "dumbass" or an equivalent, take a look at the definition here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem) attacks.

I'm sure there are plenty of issues you can mindlessly attack me on. You don't need to make up shit and post it to the wrong thread.

Posted by: Rich at September 11, 2006 08:48 AM (89Rw1)

7 heh... now don't I look the fool. I actually did post in this thread and forgot. =)

Still, the irrational, personal attacks are unnecessary plus, I think I just demonstrated I'm not a Clinton apologist.

Posted by: Rich at September 11, 2006 08:50 AM (89Rw1)

8 btw, I didn't even post "None of the above" to defend Clinton. I just didn't think any of the options applied. The question says "our nation's first". From there it's a process of elimination.

A. He's not black
B. He's not a child
C. He wasn't our first sexual addict president
D. He wasn't our first criminal president
E. He wasn't a traitor
F. He wasn't the greatest president

I imagine point E will be argued and I'll admit to being curious as to what tortured logic will be used to call him a traitor. I however just don't see any actions that could be construed as traitorous actions.

C & D may apply if the question didn't say "our nation's first."

Also, Improbulus Maximus, sorry about the digs for "posting in the wrong thread." I've been up 30 hours or so and I made a stupid mistake.

Posted by: Rich at September 11, 2006 09:14 AM (89Rw1)

9 Bill Clinton americas first elected dictator and tyrant this scoundrel still want to be bully boy even while he is out of office and the dirt bags in hollywood still think he is great

Posted by: sandpiper at September 11, 2006 02:52 PM (D9h75)

10 Sandpiper, he was a lot of things but seriously, "dictator" and "tyrant"? I don't think those words mean what you seem to think they mean.

Posted by: Rich at September 11, 2006 03:52 PM (89Rw1)

11 sbrzup rhulymbvj dofwaim spqom yjbknfu hyfw nmwefdubk

Posted by: lrdh nzciqgoxb at January 19, 2007 03:06 AM (0+1rt)

12 God site. Thanks!

Posted by: Mike Stranger at March 12, 2007 05:40 AM (zySws)

13 Thanks 123 adware

Posted by: Mike Stranger at March 16, 2007 02:39 PM (DfmBw)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
34kb generated in CPU 0.0658, elapsed 0.1162 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.1027 seconds, 168 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.