April 17, 2007

Breaking: Shooting at White House

whitehouse_washington_capital.jpg

I just got an e-mail from Larwyn who says that C-SPAN is reporting that the White House in in full lockdown mode. There is said to have been a suspicious package and it seems that two Secret Service officers have shot each other. Can that be right?

News.com:

TWO US Secret Service officers were injured today after a gun held by another Secret Service officer was accidentally fired at the White House.

One officer suffered a shrapnel wound to the face, and the other was wounded in the leg, said spokesman Darrin Blackford.

Neither injury was life threatening.

"It appears that at approximately 2.10pm (4.10am AEST) there was an accidental discharge of a service-issued weapon, which occurred inside the Southwest Gate at a security post near the White House," Mr Blackford said.

This may be one of the most bizarre accidents at the White House. Ever. Far more bizarre than the impulse to stain a fat intern's dress.

President Bush is NOT at the White House. He is in Blacksburg, Virginia, the scene of yesterday's Virginia Tech massacre.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:48 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.

1 How can a accidental discharge that goes into officer's leg also cause "shapnel" that hits the other officer in the face?  That makes no sence I could see a a bullet hitting a wall and maybe causing shrapnel but going into officers leg then out then hits wall ground something causing shrapnel that goes up and hits other officer in face?  If this is accurate it is one of the most bizzare "never do that twice" moment in a very long time.

Posted by: C-Low at April 17, 2007 05:10 PM (ZNANk)

2

Two dumbasses.


Posted by: John Doe at April 17, 2007 05:12 PM (TmLg9)

3 Rusty, grow up you fucking right winger. Lots of people cheat on their wifes.

Posted by: John Doe at April 17, 2007 05:57 PM (TmLg9)

4 John Doe, regardless of the commonness of adultery, blowing your load on the dress of a fat intern is still bizarre, especially when you can get much hotter sluts to gurgle for you.

But, as we know a 'certain type of man' likes fat bottomed girls, you don't see it as bizarre at all. 

Posted by: wooga at April 17, 2007 06:27 PM (t9sT5)

5 You got a point there but still.

Posted by: John Doe at April 17, 2007 06:45 PM (TmLg9)

6 But, as we know a 'certain type of man' likes fat bottomed girls, you don't see it as bizarre at all.

He just thinks it bizarre because he doesn't have sex with women.

Posted by: Randman at April 17, 2007 09:07 PM (Sal3J)

7 Yawn.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2007 06:54 PM (MTHRd)

8 LOL.

Posted by: William Clark at April 19, 2007 12:25 PM (TmLg9)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
30kb generated in CPU 0.1212, elapsed 0.1309 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.1146 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.