December 01, 2005

Blogger Held Hostage in Iraq

The American hostage in Iraq, Thomas Fox, who's name was first revealed on The Jawa Report on Nov. 29th, is also a blogger. His blog, Waiting in the Light, was last updated on November 9th. In his last entry, Tom Fox, now held by Sunni insurgents with links to those who fought the U.S. in Fallujah, decries the U.S. led assault on that city. Despite the fact that Fallujah was run by a form of strict Islamic law before the U.S. liberated that city--in which civilians were murdered for appearing too 'Western'-- Fox's entry decries the U.S. occupation with no words of criticism of the 'resistance' that fought his fellow countrymen.

Further, Fox seems to believe a Muslim cleric's version of the Fallujah narrative over those of the Marines and soldiers that liberated that city. Perhaps Fox was unaware that the cleric was possibly a member of the Shura council which ran Fallujah and which meted out death sentences to prostitutes, collaborated and gave refuge to al Qaeda linked terrorists (possibly some of the same terrorists holding Fox hostage now), and which saw even the possession of Western media a sign of apostasy?

It is tragic irony that those now holding Fox hostage are those that he found difficult to criticize, and that the U.S. Marines and soldiers which he found so easy to fault are his best bet on surviving his ordeal alive.

His entries are a mix of personal reflection and first-hand reporting from Iraq. His blog also reveals that Fox was a truly committed pacifist, willing to die rather than do violence to others. There is much to be admired in a man willing to die for his beliefs.

However, it remains unclear why it is that Western pacifists seem so eager to take on the U.S. and Israel and so willing to overlook the violence and aggression of Jihadis and Palestinians? If all violence is equally bad, then why the focus on Western violence and not on those who are the enemy of the West?

Unless of course the pacifist really doesn't believe his tactics would work in totalitarian states or among violent religious fanatics? Which, I think, is quite revealing.

Regardless of his naivite and poor judgement, we pray for his and the other hostages release and that those responsible will meet a swift and deadly justice. Fox is an innocent and a victim, and those who are holding him captive are guilty and aggressors. At The Jawa Report, we will not equivocate between the two and hold that the value of the life of an innocent is greater than the value of the life of those guilty of hostage taking.

Posted by: Rusty at 06:19 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 577 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Respectfully, I take issue with this statement: "There is much to be admired in a man willing to die for his beliefs." (curse the quirk of this website that forces me to retype this passage, instead of merely copying and pasting!)

I think that the quality of the beliefs must come into consideration. I find nothing admirable in Mohammed Atta or his accomplices. I find nothing admirable in the suicide bomber who attacks a group of children getting candy from American soldiers. In fact, I revile the memory of these murderous creatures.

Granted, Fox is not on a par with these troglodytes, but his beliefs are so naive and ill-founded that I can find nothing to admire there, either. And I revile him for putting more people at risk for indulging his juvenile fantasies.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at December 01, 2005 06:41 PM (RHG+K)

2 Of course, Atta was willing to KILL for his beliefs as well as die. A bit less admirable, don't you think?

Posted by: Rusty at December 01, 2005 07:03 PM (JQjhA)

3 No, because many people are willing to kill, and die themselves, for a belief.

The difference is that Atta was willing to give up his life to kill innocent civilians who had done him no real harm. And he was willing to do it based on his beliefs.

This guy is, as far as we know, an innocent civilian who walked (yes, willingly) into the lion's den.

Misguided? Yes. Naive? Yes. Stupid? Yes. Possibly metally ill? Possibly.

But none of those criteria add up to committing an act of evil for which one would deserve to be beheaded.

And brother, the U.S. military has been putting it's ass on the line for over 200 years in support of someone's juvenile fantasies. That's what they do, that's their charter, that's the risk they themselves acknowledge they are willing to take.

And that is why we honor them so completely.

Posted by: Vinnie at December 01, 2005 07:24 PM (Kr6/f)

4 I didn't say I wanted him beheaded, Vinnie. I just said I don't admire him.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at December 01, 2005 07:27 PM (RHG+K)

5 And I don't really admire him THAT MUCH. I also admire Gandhi, a little, but mostly no. There is something immoral about pacifism. This is why South Park gets it right placing Gandhi in hell.

Posted by: Rusty at December 01, 2005 07:41 PM (JQjhA)

6 No you didn't. My bad.

I'm a little more specific. I don't admire his beliefs, his ideology, his mindset.

But I do have admiration for the courage it takes to walk into the snakepit unarmed for your cause.

Look at it this way. The Germans in WWI gave the Marines the nickname "Devil Dogs." They did that, despite polar opposite views, out of respect and admiration for the Corps' fighting ability.

That's the point of view I'm looking at Rusty's statement from.

Of course, unlike the hard Left, I am truly open-minded. If evidence comes to light that my point of view is unfounded, or misquided itself, my opinion will certainly change.

Posted by: Vinnie at December 01, 2005 07:49 PM (Kr6/f)

7 And one little off-topic aside to the lefty-socialist set that may be reading this exchange.

This is how we debate. You notice no name calling, no vitriol, no hate, no calls for "shut him up!"

Compare this to what ya'll have done to Zell Miller and Joe Liebermann.

thatisall.

Posted by: Vinnie at December 01, 2005 07:54 PM (Kr6/f)

8 Good point Vinnie. There's another thread further down that could use this advice.

Posted by: Oyster at December 01, 2005 07:59 PM (YudAC)

9 And a callout of thanks from the lefty-socialist set, Vinnie. Your integrity and maturity in this debate is appreciated.

Posted by: Rob at December 01, 2005 11:50 PM (Wl7Nx)

10 Good point Rusty. Pacifism is morally indefensible in the face of evil.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 02, 2005 01:06 PM (0yYS2)

11 Agent Smith says that Jesus Christ never carried an AK-47.

Posted by: Agent Smith at December 03, 2005 09:55 PM (VDGim)

12
Hi

Im new to this blog so ummm ill refrain from shouting and hurling abuse to the sheer naivate of your arguments.

Im assuming you guys are from the US considering the earlier comment of upholding and respecting your marines completely....woohooo- there is a naive assertion. Someone who willingly goes into battle against another country and upholdes its own nations regime at the expense of people who have a raw material - in this case OIL which you dont have anymore- HAHAHAHA! ooops and your in three times more debt compared with the whole of Africa, i guess desperation calls and its time to go in and screw over a very 'wrong' dictatorship which the US and Britain promoted. I believe its wrong terrorists do what they do and im afraid thats why I uphold Bush and Blair responsible for the slaying of thousands of Iraqs through bombing cluster bombing and the deadly sanctions imposed in the country since the earlier 1990s by Daddy Bush. Your man Tom is a good guy and prayers indeed him and the other 3 hostages do not die tomorrow. Naive - yes i agree howevere inherently good absolutely. Marines- naive- yes. They believe they are in there to do a good job and 'help' the Iraq people. They do not belong in the country and are there to do no good except rob the Iraq people of the rescource they own- we dont. So Puppet people back to your idiot boxes and American gladiators- oh and have Macdonals and Coke with that too will y'all????! For you have bought into whats the biggest lie of the 21st century- who indeed would wanna be an 'american idiot'.

Respect to Tom and more like Him- walking into the lions den indeed not the best move but sort OUR foreign policy out and you wont have as many dens.

Ps aint ya prould of Guantanamo???

Posted by: jude at December 09, 2005 05:31 PM (P7wJZ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
37kb generated in CPU 0.0112, elapsed 0.0774 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0705 seconds, 167 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.