July 18, 2006

Bernstein Smashes Arab Lies

David Bernstein blows apart the lie that Israeli occupation of the territories has "impoverished" the palestinian Arabs:

Browing around the blogosphere recently, I've noticed that critics of Israel consistently repeat various versions of the following talking point (promoting by false propaganda emanating from sources such as this one): "what do you expect from the Palestinians? Israeli occupation impoverished them, and desperate, hungry people can only be expected to take desperate measures."

The idea that "occupation," per se, impoverished the Palestinians is simply wrong. . .

--"Private consumption per capita [and per capita includes population growth, which was among the highest in the world in the territories] rose during 1969-1986 at an overall rate of 5% per annum."

-- Outside of regugee camps in Gaza (which Israel wanted to replace with permanent housing, but was prevented so as not to help solve the "refugee crisis" that provided the PLO's reason for existence), "in 1986, 95% of the Households in Gaza had running water and 100% had electricity (compared with 3 percent for water and 14% for electricity in 1974)."

--The percentage individual "with at least 9 years of education has risen from 22% in 1970 to 46% in 1986 in the West Bank, and from 32% to 54% in the Gaza Strip during the same period." Not noted in the paper I'm citing, all of the universities in the West Bank and Gaza were opened during the Israeli administration of the territories. There were none before that.

--As this source (hostile to Israel) acknowledges, as of 1993, per capita income in the Palestinian territories was higher than in Egypt (MUCH!) or Jordan, the countries that previously occupied Gaza and the West Bank, respectively. The logical conclusion from this is that if Israel had not won these territories in the Six Day War, the Arab population would have been much poorer.

So much for that theory. What else ya got?

Posted by: Ragnar at 08:37 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 303 words, total size 2 kb.

1 People always say "but Israel shouldn't even be there in the first place. They wouldn't exist if it wasn't for us. We took the land from the Arabs and gave it to Israel" (speaking from a USA perspective.)

I Don't know the exact history so I was hoping you could shed some light on it for me, but isn't it true that the Arabs took the land from the Jews in the first place? Thanks in advance.

Posted by: Tom at July 18, 2006 08:52 AM (HbUjN)

2 Britain administrated Palistine as a colony and was pushed out by the UN. Biggest mistake ever made.

Posted by: Howie at July 18, 2006 08:57 AM (hjI0c)

3 You're forgetting one other key piece of info (stats aside). Namely that any "poverty" Israel is reponsible for could be more than compensated if even a couple Arab countries gave some of their wealth to improve the situation. Instead, they sit there and use the Palestinians as leverage for their own self-interests.

Posted by: Venom at July 18, 2006 10:36 AM (gyr2M)

4 Sorry, I should have phrased that as "Bernstein forgot one other...", since he wrote the article.

Posted by: Venom at July 18, 2006 10:39 AM (gyr2M)

5 They call themselves Palestinians, but that is a huge lie also. They are mostly from Jordan, and Egypt. They are not Palestinians.

Yes Tom the Israel's were there several thousand years before these so called Palesyinians. Were do you think the Western Wall comes from?

Posted by: Leatherneck at July 18, 2006 05:54 PM (8uWFo)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
31kb generated in CPU 0.0688, elapsed 0.1025 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0913 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.