May 07, 2006

Sickening
Via The London Times Online :Nobody but her killers knew just how much she had suffered until a film showing her death on February 22 at the hands of two musclebound men in military uniforms emerged last week. Her family’s worst fears of what might have happened have been far exceeded by the reality….
...We now know that it was not that swift for Bahjat. First she was stripped to the waist, a humiliation for any woman but particularly so for a pious Muslim who concealed her hair, arms and legs from men other than her father and brother.
Then her arms were bound behind her back. A golden locket in the shape of Iraq that became her glittering trademark in front of the television cameras must have been removed at some point — it is nowhere to be seen in the grainy film, which was made by someone who pointed a mobile phone at her as she lay on a patch of earth in mortal terror.
By the time filming begins, the condemned woman has been blindfolded with a white bandage.
It is stained with blood that trickles from a wound on the left side of her head. She is moaning, although whether from the pain of what has already been done to her or from the fear of what is about to be inflicted is unclear...
...A large man dressed in military fatigues, boots and cap approaches from behind and covers her mouth with his left hand. In his right hand, he clutches a large knife with a black handle and an 8in blade. He proceeds to cut her throat from the middle, slicing from side to side.
Her cries — “Ah, ah, ah†— can be heard above the “Allahu akbar†(God is greatest) intoned by the holder of the mobile phone.
Even then, there is no quick release for Bahjat. Her executioner suddenly stands up, his job only half done. A second man in a dark T-shirt and camouflage trousers places his right khaki boot on her abdomen and pushes down hard eight times, forcing a rush of blood from her wounds as she moves her head from right to left.
Only now does the executioner return to finish the task. He hacks off her head and drops it to the ground, then picks it up again and perches it on her bare chest so that it faces the film-maker in a grotesque parody of one of her pieces to camera.
The voice of one of the Arab world’s most highly regarded and outspoken journalists has been silenced. She was 30....
...I found it hard enough to bear the news of her murder. When I saw it replayed, it was as if part of me had died with her. How much more gruelling it must have been for a close family friend who watched the film this weekend and cried when he heard her voice.
The friend, who cannot be identified, knew nothing of her beheading but had been guarding other horrifying details of Bahjat’s ordeal. She had nine drill holes in her right arm and 10 in her left, he said. The drill had also been applied to her legs, her navel and her right eye. One can only hope that these mutilations were made after her death.
Also see the Mudville Gazette who adds:
Regardless of which side in the conflict killed her (and I have my own thoughts on that - in the eyes of her killers her greatest crime was most likely being a woman outside of a kitchen) the London Times reporter can't resist a mild apology for their act:Blue Crab Boulevard says :Just as Bahjat bore witness to countless atrocities that she covered for her television station, Al-Arabiya, during Iraq’s descent into sectarian conflict, so the recording of her execution embodies the depths of the country’s depravity after three years of war.In truth, it represents a depth of depravity achieved over centuries. From the description, her killers hadn't just conceived or improvised their method execution on the spot - they seem to have been well practiced. But such is the nature of the enemy in this war, and perhaps this is their most sacred and well honed knowledge: if a brutality can be inflicted that exceeds all human ability to comprehend, the humans will find a way to deny it
This is the face of evil itself. That the monsters choose to hide behind masks shows how deeply depraved and cowardly they really are. We must remember we are at war. Or that face will show itself again and again.Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch chimes in with the following:
Anyone who thinks that God's greatness is established by such acts of barbaric cruelty must be resisted at all costs.I want to add one thought. I know this is a horrid thing. I’ve seen several of these things and they turn my stomach. I dread having the even think of it. But this video should be released as respectfully and responsibly as possible. Hard to do I know, but the public must be shown this evil. Otherwise how are they to know the truth. Also I have an all too realistic awareness of what the threat below really means. We don't want to release it but we feel we have to release it. The Jawa Report will bring you updates if and when it becomes available. Our prayers go out to Atwar Bahjat and her family.
Others : Malkin and Captains Quarters.
See our beheading archive; Warning Graphic Images. (note the beheading of the Nepalise hostage is very similar in description. Don't watch it unless you are certain you want to and are over 18 or 100)
Posted by: Howie at
10:00 AM
| Comments (31)
| Add Comment
Post contains 989 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Graeme at May 07, 2006 11:59 AM (XF1Ly)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 07, 2006 12:01 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: john Ryan at May 07, 2006 12:37 PM (TcoRJ)
Posted by: Howie at May 07, 2006 12:56 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 07, 2006 01:44 PM (rUyw4)
WE have those who constantly harp on how bad the West is, how they're the "oppressors" yet, when this is the reaction, they're strangely silent. They know damn good and well there is no excuse for what happened to this woman and to bring it up detracts from their argument.
When cornered, they often say, "Well, er, uh, of course that's wrong ...... but," Why must they equivocate?
Sometimes, something is just so evil - there IS nothing else. There IS no excuse. There IS nothing else to say.
Posted by: Oyster at May 07, 2006 02:42 PM (YudAC)
Not to put the cruelty and stupidity of this act into the shade, but the depiction brings to mind something that I've noticed in all the Angry Arab beheading videos.
Why can't Arabs sharpen a knife? Historically they've always used slashing weapons, and a dull scimitar is pretty useless, so when did they forget how to use a whetstone?
One of the videos I've seen featured a beheading so botched it could have passed for a Saturday Night Live skit if the knife had been fake. Maybe you've seen it--the victim is in a chair, bound hand and foot, and some lumpy goombah in a homemade ninja suit comes up behind him to do the deed. Problem is, not only is the knife dull but the idiot (obviously not a Boy Scout) is cutting toward himself. Naturally, as he tries to saw the dull blade through the skin, the victim squirms out of the chair and tucks his chin, so the executioner and his buddies end up sliding around in a puddle of blood trying to wrestle the guy while avoiding getting cut by their own knife. After some minutes of this there is a break in the video after which the killer displays the freshly detached head and holds forth on God's greatness, utterly oblivious to the irony of the scene. (My thought was, if this clusterfark is an example of God's greatness, what does it look like when He isn't really trying?)
I suspect the dull-knife phenomenon is Arab rather than Muslim, because I've seen the infamous Chechen beheading video and it's worlds apart. If there can be such a thing as a good beheading video, this is it. In fact, the whole thing is handled so businesslike it resembles an instructional video for people who want to take up beheading as a hobby (and knowing the Chechens it may well be.) They've got all the cardinal points covered. The victim on the ground, so he can't flop over. The killing is done outdoors, so everyone keeps their traction and nobody has to mop up. The victim's head is firmly clamped to a large flat rock by the executioner's boot, so there will be no writhing about. The knife is big and razor-sharp. There is no posturing nor ecstatic ululating nor reading from the Scripture, though all celebrants apart from their guest are zealous Muslims. The executioner carefully places the point just below the victim's ear, edge away from himself, and strokes easily through the neck in less than 5 seconds. Presumably the head was removed for taxidermy after the twitching was over, but this was rightly judged a separate task.
Posted by: ShannonKW at May 07, 2006 02:59 PM (dT1MB)
If you cant believe my liberal President who can you believe?
Posted by: Rod Stanton at May 07, 2006 03:04 PM (EgoYF)
Posted by: Jo macDougal at May 07, 2006 03:43 PM (EgoYF)
Posted by: Roy Smith at May 07, 2006 03:50 PM (AoEIx)
Posted by: jd at May 07, 2006 04:25 PM (aqTJB)
Posted by: Howie at May 07, 2006 04:28 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 07, 2006 04:30 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Howie at May 07, 2006 04:31 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: Roy Smith at May 07, 2006 04:57 PM (AoEIx)
As for Christianity: yes, it does preach, in the New Testament, a much more loving attitude than the Old Testament (altho not without its brutality). It is clear to me that Christianity is, as doctrine, a better fit for modernity than Islam. It did, however, take us hundreds of years to stop violently waging war in the name of God, massacring those who took a different view of God, etc. Ironically enough, it is the one aspect of Islam that is most "modern" compared to historic Christianity that has prevented its authoritative evolution: its diffuse lines of authority. Christians, for whatever reason, have tended to organize around established lines of ecclesiastical hierarchy (Baptists excepted). Thus, when Christianity reformed, each denomination could do so in a relatively organized fashion. Islam lacks any such organized leadership, a tragedy as they try and reform.
Of course, I know, IM that you don't consider any of these faiths worthy of your support, so it is to some extent an academic debate for you, isn't it? And if you don't have any religion, upon what morality do you base your wars of extermination against liberals and Muslims? Randian objectivism? Nietzschean ubermenschery? Nihilistic libertarianism? Secular humanism? Neofascism?
Posted by: jd at May 07, 2006 05:02 PM (aqTJB)
I was reading this the other night, and it jumped out at me, while it discusses Communism, and Nazism et al, it really applies to Islam too:
Ideology -- that is what gives evildoing it's long-sought justification and gives the evildoer the necessary steadfastness and determination. That is social theory which helps to make his acts seem good instead of bad in his own and other's eyes, so that he won't hear reproaches and curses but will receive praise and honors. That is how the agents of the Inquisition fortified their wills: by invoking Christianity; the conquerors of foreign lands, by extolling the grandeur of their Motherland; the colonizers, by equality, brotherhood of future generations. Thanks to ideology, the twentieth century was fated to experiment evildoing on a scale calculated in the millions. -- Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago.
Posted by: davec at May 07, 2006 05:06 PM (CcXvt)
It is high time we treated them like the animals they are.
Butcher them. Put them to sleep. Put them in cages.
Jebus, I won't let one of the buggers step on my lawn. Bad for the grass.
Posted by: Filthy Allah at May 07, 2006 05:42 PM (/RE21)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 07, 2006 05:45 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Richard at May 07, 2006 05:51 PM (7KF8r)
"Islam needs to undergo the same reformation and reexamination that Christianity did coming out of the Middle Ages."
Are you sure Islam "needs" this, or that we in the West would approve of them more if the Koran stopped being an obstacle to adopting our moral beliefs?
The West has greatly benefited by rubbishing some of the more inconvenient of the Bible's teachings. But you should be careful to distinguish between teachings that are truly impractical and those that are merely incompatible with modern moral vogue. For example, the requirement to forgive wrongdoers would make justice and civilization impossible, so we gain a real demonstrable benefit by ignoring it; but rules about modest dress and sexual conduct don't restrict anything but your right to party, so we could impose these on our people and be just as civilized as we are now (though grumpier.)
I mention this because when Westerners look at Islamic countries with an eye toward junking the rules that are supposedly holding them back, they always pick the wrong ones. The plight of Muslim women, for example, wets no end of hankies in the West, but there is no point in emancipating the women in some countries. The U.S. could afford to do this after we industrialized and babymaking became a burden rather than blessing. Sure, we take a self-congratulatory attitude toward it now as though we suddenly awoke to how evil it was to keep 'em barefoot and pregnant, but it's no coincidence that we had this epiphany when the economy had found better things for them to do.
Personally, I think the biggest things holding back Muslim countries are their penchant for nationalized industry combined with a lack of rule of law, but it's unclear how this can be pinned on the religion (not that I'd be surprised if it could...)
Posted by: ShannonKW at May 07, 2006 06:41 PM (dT1MB)
Posted by: Imoprobulus Maximus at May 07, 2006 07:20 PM (0yYS2)
When it gets this evil ... I don't know it's just hard to phantom how evil these shits can be.
Posted by: jack at May 07, 2006 11:30 PM (aitZQ)
When it gets this evil ... I don't know it's just hard to phantom how evil these shits can be.
Posted by: jack at May 07, 2006 11:30 PM (aitZQ)
Posted by: john Ryan at May 08, 2006 07:57 AM (TcoRJ)
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 08, 2006 08:45 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 08, 2006 09:53 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: sharon spry at May 08, 2006 01:04 PM (BdT9X)
Posted by: Howie at May 08, 2006 02:59 PM (D3+20)
"Every villain is followed by a sophist with a sponge." -- EM Forster, misquoting
a Lord Acton lecture
Posted by: The Sanity Inspector at May 08, 2006 03:47 PM (uw+0A)
Posted by: jd at May 08, 2006 05:10 PM (aqTJB)
34 queries taking 0.0363 seconds, 186 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.