September 19, 2006

AP Responds to Bloggers: Cite Known Terrorist Sympathizer as Source

I just love this response by the AP to Dan Riehl's query as to whether or not Bilal Hussein held the camcorder as Michael Moore's minutemen murdered an Italian civilian.

Here is some of it according to the AP and via the blogfather, Charles Johnson:

This AP story explains that masked insurgents stopped Hussein and other AP journalists, including an AP video journalist, at a roadblock and took them to the site where the blindfolded body lay, already stiff with rigor mortis. They propped the body up and allowed the journalists to photograph and videotape it.
Okay, so they propped the body up. Go check out the video again. Tell me how the body is being propped up? It is possible, I guess. Likely? I dunno.

And here is the original story, as run by the AP. Italics and higlights are mine:

Iraqi militants said they shot and killed an Italian citizen after he tried to break through a guerrilla roadblock on a highway outside the insurgent stronghold of Ramadi.

Masked gunmen took three Iraqi journalists to a location in the desert outside Ramadi on Wednesday and showed them the blindfolded body, one of the journalists recounted.

Photos showed the body of the man in jeans and a leather jacket, a white rag tied around his eyes, propped up on a sandy incline. Two masked gunmen posed with their automatic rifles pointed at the body.

So, although there is a claim that three witnesses saw poor Salvatore Santoro's body, the report comes exclusively from a single source.

100 bucks says that single source is....Bilal Hussein. In any event, all three are Iraqi stringers.

Another troubling aspect to the original AP story is its headline: Iraqi militants say they shot Italian who tried to break through checkpoint

And here is the lead paragraph:

Iraqi militants said they shot and killed an Italian citizen after he tried to break through a guerrilla roadblock on a highway outside the insurgent stronghold of Ramadi.
The implication of the headline and lead paragraph is that Salvatore Santoro was shot as he tried to break through a roadblock...ala, Nicola Calipari.

But read the actual content of the story and you realize something else happened:

told by the militants that the man had tried to run the roadblock on Monday, hit and killed one of the gunmen, then crashed the car. The gunmen said they then "executed" the man.
Executing a person is a far cry from shooting him as he broke through a blockade. No, they murdered him in cold blood after his car crashed.

Much later than that. In fact, so much later that Santoro's 'corpse' is seen with his hands tied behind his back and with a blindfold on. To spin his murder as just a casualty of war disgraces his memory and is an outrage!

No bias at the AP. Nope.

And what about the portions of the video and the photographs taken by Bilal Hussein which were taken indoors? Something else is going on here folks.

And all this from a witness who is being detained in Iraq right now for his known ties to al Qaeda.

Thank you for clarifying that AP. You're a peach.

Posted by: Rusty at 05:51 PM | Comments (20) | Add Comment
Post contains 540 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Bilal should get the death penalty.

Posted by: Darth Vag at September 19, 2006 06:05 PM (HSkSw)

2 I've had a big problem with the AP ever since they first insisted on writing "war on terror" in quotation marks and lowercase letters instead of rightfully writing it as the War on Terror. That shows their own left wing bias that we aren't really at war and Bush is just exaggerating the threat.

Posted by: Thrill at September 19, 2006 06:13 PM (3zqsv)

3 Well done, especially the point about the "checkpoint" which wasn't. FYI to all: the AP is owned and run by its 1500 member newspapers. It IS the MSM.

Posted by: Balsy at September 19, 2006 06:27 PM (ds0+e)

4 Well done, especially the point about the "checkpoint" which wasn't. FYI to all: the AP is owned and run by its 1500 member newspapers. It IS the MSM.

Posted by: Balsy at September 19, 2006 06:30 PM (ds0+e)

5 Dr. Rusty - did you catch the part about not revealing the journalists' names for safety reasons but then Bilal Hussein's name is attached to the original captions?

Something really stinks and it isn't just Michael Moore.

Posted by: Chickenhawk Express at September 19, 2006 06:44 PM (9zaUf)

6 Excellent find guys.

Posted by: Mark at September 19, 2006 07:24 PM (j+tr0)

7 That picture looked like a guy who was alive and had been held for quite a while before he was shot. Looked very unkept. Not the look of a person who was just out and about driving.

Posted by: SeeMonk at September 19, 2006 08:01 PM (n4VvM)

8
Fix your damm site. I can't read the text of the article because of the menu bar on the right column

Posted by: visitor at September 19, 2006 09:06 PM (7oA2p)

9 I had that problem for a little while too visitor. I changed my screen resolution to a higher setting and it cleared up.
 
Hey Rusty, I have been experimenting a little and have found pictures are almost as good as tits when it comes to hits.

Posted by: SeeMonk at September 19, 2006 09:10 PM (n4VvM)

10 Perhaps the story of Pham Xuan An is relevant; perhaps not. An was a journalist for Reuters and Time magazine. He also was a secret agent for the Communists throughout the Vietnam War.

More details:
http://www.albany.edu/news/campus_news/2005/may2005/bass.htm

Posted by: French Trader at September 19, 2006 09:16 PM (B3hMb)

11 I don't know, Rusty.

I'm willing to buy that he's already dead in the picture with the two scumbags posing. That struck me when I first saw the pictures. 'Damn, he looks like he's dead to me.' And I'm pretty good at spotting a stiff as opposed to a live one.

But that doesn't change the fact that I don't for a second believe a terrorist stringer being used as the single source to exonerate a terrorist stringer.

Bilal's dirty, alright, no doubt in my mind about that.

Posted by: Misha I at September 19, 2006 09:37 PM (S0K0u)

12 if you Look that guy getting posed with is dead,has been for a good bit and from a bullet to the head.
take a look
http://img.waffleimages.com/fdb45ecb0848bf6335ed74856bd8442920c1d7d7/pict255.jpg

Posted by: tarzan at September 19, 2006 09:39 PM (dz4G5)

13 I feel bad for that poor man. I hope I get the chance someday to fight insane individuals as the ones in the photos.

Just a thought, I wonder if Hamoodi, a 54 former U. of Missouri engineering professor who has been raided by the FBI in MO. with the Muslim charity Life for Relief helped pay for the guns thses moon god worshippers are holding.

Posted by: Leatherneck at September 19, 2006 10:05 PM (D2g/j)

14 The AP has a snuff-fetish.

AP's "Corporate communicators" might try growing a heart for a change.

They refer continually to the murdered corpse of an italian person, Salvatore Santoro, as "the body," and "it."

Then they admit nonchalantly that their reporters stood by and snapped pics of Salvatore while "militants" posed his lifeless form for their shots, as if it were a plastic doll koopee doll.

I'm reminded of Lebanese Islamists propping-up the heads and arms of dead little girls before the AP's cameras a month ago. -Steve

Posted by: Steve at September 19, 2006 11:52 PM (+5ORu)

15 Steve: these people have spent their entire lives around death and talk of death. They're completely desensitized to the actual meaning of it. In fact, it's the greatest thing that can happen to them as far as they're concerned. They get virgins and the infidels (in their minds) get hell. It's quite a racket they've got going there. Most of us worry about what we've done to effect others in our lives before we go. These guys don't. Most of us are affected by the sight of a dead person or worse, to actually witness that death, even if it's a truly evil person. These guys get off on it. If it's the bad guy in their minds, they cheer. If it's one of their own, they cheer.

I'm curious though - Since all we hear of is how Muslim men get 72 virgins and all that crap, I've wondered often; what do the women get? Or do they get anything at all since they're, you know, just cattle?

Posted by: Oyster at September 20, 2006 05:31 AM (YudAC)

16 Oyster the women get 72 unbathed hairy goat smelling men with diseased pizzles. Because they allow themselves to be cattle.

Posted by: SeeMonk at September 20, 2006 08:22 AM (7teJ9)

17 Then I must decline Shazzam the American's invitation to convert. I was hoping for 72 Chip-n-Dale dancers.

Posted by: Oyster at September 20, 2006 08:52 AM (abcRW)

18 Would you like to have a snipper rifle and take aim at those two hooded cowards and blow their brains out to save that person a hood hiding the faces of rank cowards cant keep out a bullet

Posted by: sandpiper at September 20, 2006 01:51 PM (r8sk+)

19 I don't get it. Doesn't "tried" in the headline mean he never got through, as the article states. And he was shot. That is, he was executed by being shot. The distinction is made in the article (and it is always important to actually read something - and not just the headline). The headline does not say he was shot while trying to break through. It says he tried to break through AND was shot. I think you are all reaching jsut a bit to find something wrong here.

Posted by: TonyRage at September 21, 2006 01:47 PM (YBpoA)

20 Not reaching at all.
Accurate headline: Iraqi militants execute Italian who tried to break through checkpoint

Biased headline: Iraqi militants say they shot Italian who tried to break through checkpoint

It should be intrinsically obvious as to why those headlines are significantly different and why the original headline reeks of bias. I am sure that if it had been Coalition troops commiting such an atrocity, the accurate headline would have been used worldwide by the MSM.

Posted by: deepdiver at September 21, 2006 02:08 PM (2RsA+)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
42kb generated in CPU 0.0144, elapsed 0.0774 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0687 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.